Literature DB >> 12215984

Ropivacaine for dental anesthesia: a dose-finding study.

Malin Ernberg1, Sigvard Kopp.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to determine the optimal concentration and volumes of ropivacaine for dental anesthesia as regards onset and duration of action. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Thirty healthy individuals with a mean age of 32 years participated in the study on a voluntary basis. All subjects received a ropivacaine injection in 1 of 3 randomized concentrations (2.0, 5.0, or 7.5 mg/mL) for infiltration anesthesia and mandibular nerve block in a double-blind manner. The onset time and duration of anesthesia were assessed by electric pulp test, pinprick test of the gingiva, and presence of feeling of numbness of the lip.
RESULTS: Regardless of dose, only 5 patients received pulpal anesthesia after infiltration, but all 3 concentrations anesthetized the gingiva and upper lip. The onset of pulpal anesthesia occurred less than 5 minutes after injection and lasted for 4 to 58 minutes. Pinprick anesthesia lasted for 8 to 48 minutes, and numbness of the upper lip lasted 1 to 4 hours. The effectiveness of the mandibular nerve block with regard to pulpal anesthesia was dose dependent. Only ropivacaine at 7.5 mg/mL produced sufficient anesthesia. The onset of pulpal anesthesia occurred less than 10 minutes after injection and lasted for 2 to 6 hours. Pinprick anesthesia lasted for 3 to 6 hours and numbness of the lower lip lasted for 5 to 9 hours.
CONCLUSION: This study shows that ropivacaine could be useful as a local anesthetic for mandibular nerve block in dentistry and that the very long duration of both pulpal and soft tissue anesthesia may be favorable in reducing postoperative pain. Copyright 2002 American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12215984     DOI: 10.1053/joms.2002.34409

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Surg        ISSN: 0278-2391            Impact factor:   1.895


  14 in total

Review 1.  Ropivacaine: a review of its use in regional anaesthesia and acute pain management.

Authors:  Dene Simpson; Monique P Curran; Vicki Oldfield; Gillian M Keating
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 9.546

2.  Anesthetic efficacy of different ropivacaine concentrations for inferior alveolar nerve block.

Authors:  Eman El-Sharrawy; John A Yagiela
Journal:  Anesth Prog       Date:  2006

3.  The local pharmacokinetics of ³H-ropivacaine and ¹⁴C-lidocaine after maxillary infiltration anesthesia in rats.

Authors:  Hiromi Kimi; Mikiko Yamashiro; Shuichi Hashimoto
Journal:  Anesth Prog       Date:  2012

4.  Comparative Analysis of the Anesthetic Efficacy of 0.5 and 0.75 % Ropivacaine for Inferior Alveolar Nerve Block in Surgical Removal of Impacted Mandibular Third Molars.

Authors:  Darpan Bhargava; Nupur Chakravorty; Elangovan Rethish; Ashwini Deshpande
Journal:  J Maxillofac Oral Surg       Date:  2013-05-28

5.  Epinephrine Affects Pharmacokinetics of Ropivacaine Infiltrated Into Palate.

Authors:  Mikiko Yamashiro; Shuichi Hashimoto; Asako Yasuda; Katsuhisa Sunada
Journal:  Anesth Prog       Date:  2016

6.  Efficacy and safety of 1% ropivacaine for postoperative analgesia after lower third molar surgery: a prospective, randomized, double-blinded clinical study.

Authors:  Božidar Brković; Miroslav Andrić; Dejan Ćalasan; Marija Milić; Jelena Stepić; Milan Vučetić; Denis Brajković; Ljubomir Todorović
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2016-04-25       Impact factor: 3.573

7.  Is 0.75% ropivacaine more efficacious than 2% lignocaine with 1:80,000 epinephrine for IANB in surgical extraction of impacted lower third molar?

Authors:  K Varun Reddy; Anendd Jadhav; Nitin Bhola; Apoorva Mishra; Prachet Dakshinkar
Journal:  Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2019-05-14

8.  Effectiveness of anesthetic solutions for pain control in lower third molar extraction surgeries: a systematic review of randomized clinical trials with network meta-analysis.

Authors:  Marco Tulio Rossi; Murilo Navarro de Oliveira; Maria Tereza Campos Vidigal; Walbert de Andrade Vieira; Cristiano Elias Figueiredo; Cauane Blumenberg; Vinicius Lima de Almeida; Luiz Renato Paranhos; Luciana Butini Oliveira; Walter Luiz Siqueira; Rui Barbosa de Brito Júnior
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2020-11-08       Impact factor: 3.573

9.  Comparison of anaesthetic efficacy of ropivacaine (0.75% & 0.5%) with 2% lignocaine with adrenaline (1:200000) in surgical extraction of bilateral mandibular 3rd molars using IANB:a prospective, randomized, single blind study.

Authors:  Kamil N Rajpari; Neelam N Andrade; Trupti Nikalje
Journal:  J Oral Biol Craniofac Res       Date:  2021-02-09

10.  Comparison of Ropivacaine 0.75 % and Lignocaine 2 % with 1:200,000 Adrenaline in Dental Extractions: Single Blind Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Vishal Bansal; Deval Kumar; Apoorva Mowar; Avi Bansal
Journal:  J Maxillofac Oral Surg       Date:  2016-04-20
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.