Literature DB >> 31722909

Measuring what really matters: Screening in primary care.

Neil R Bell1, Guylène Thériault2, Harminder Singh3, Roland Grad4.   

Abstract

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31722909      PMCID: PMC6853363     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Can Fam Physician        ISSN: 0008-350X            Impact factor:   3.275


× No keyword cloud information.
  46 in total

1.  Evaluating the quality of medical care. 1966.

Authors:  Avedis Donabedian
Journal:  Milbank Q       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 4.911

2.  Improving together: a new quality framework for GP clusters in Scotland.

Authors:  Gregor I Smith; Stewart W Mercer; John Cm Gillies; Alan McDevitt
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2017-07       Impact factor: 5.386

3.  Shared decision is the only outcome that matters when it comes to evaluating evidence-based practice.

Authors:  James McCormack; Glyn Elwyn
Journal:  BMJ Evid Based Med       Date:  2018-07-12

4.  Era 3 for Medicine and Health Care.

Authors:  Donald M Berwick
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2016-04-05       Impact factor: 56.272

Review 5.  Stated Preference for Cancer Screening: A Systematic Review of the Literature, 1990-2013.

Authors:  Carol Mansfield; Florence K L Tangka; Donatus U Ekwueme; Judith Lee Smith; Gery P Guy; Chunyu Li; A Brett Hauber
Journal:  Prev Chronic Dis       Date:  2016-02-25       Impact factor: 2.830

Review 6.  Evaluating the quality of shared decision making during the patient-carer encounter: a systematic review of tools.

Authors:  Nathalie Bouniols; Brice Leclère; Leïla Moret
Journal:  BMC Res Notes       Date:  2016-08-02

Review 7.  A systematic review of questionnaires about patient's values and preferences in clinical practice guidelines.

Authors:  Fei Bai; Juan Ling; Gloria Esoimeme; Liang Yao; Mingxia Wang; Jiajun Huang; Anchen Shi; Zehui Cao; Yaolong Chen; Jinhui Tian; Xiaoqin Wang; Kehu Yang
Journal:  Patient Prefer Adherence       Date:  2018-11-02       Impact factor: 2.711

8.  Validity and reliability of the 9-item Shared Decision Making Questionnaire (SDM-Q-9) in a national survey in Hungary.

Authors:  Fanni Rencz; Béla Tamási; Valentin Brodszky; László Gulácsi; Miklós Weszl; Márta Péntek
Journal:  Eur J Health Econ       Date:  2019-05-20

9.  Systematic review on women's values and preferences concerning breast cancer screening and diagnostic services.

Authors:  Alexander G Mathioudakis; Minna Salakari; Liisa Pylkkanen; Zuleika Saz-Parkinson; Anke Bramesfeld; Silvia Deandrea; Donata Lerda; Luciana Neamtiu; Hector Pardo-Hernandez; Ivan Solà; Pablo Alonso-Coello
Journal:  Psychooncology       Date:  2019-03-24       Impact factor: 3.894

Review 10.  Making patient values visible in healthcare: a systematic review of tools to assess patient treatment priorities and preferences in the context of multimorbidity.

Authors:  Dee Mangin; Gaibrie Stephen; Verdah Bismah; Cathy Risdon
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2016-06-10       Impact factor: 2.692

View more
  3 in total

1.  Balancing breast cancer screening limitations.

Authors:  David M Kaplan; Jonathan M C Lam; Sharon M Gushue
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2020-03       Impact factor: 3.275

2.  What should educators teach to improve preventive health care?

Authors:  Roland Grad; Viola Antao; Neil R Bell; James A Dickinson; Raphael Rezkallah; Harminder Singh; Olga Szafran; Earle Waugh; Guylène Thériault
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2022-08       Impact factor: 3.025

3. 

Authors:  Roland Grad; Viola Antao; Neil R Bell; James A Dickinson; Raphael Rezkallah; Harminder Singh; Olga Szafran; Earle Waugh; Guylène Thériault
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2022-08       Impact factor: 3.025

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.