Literature DB >> 30541822

Alberta Family Physician Electronic Endoscopy study: Quality of 1769 colonoscopies performed by rural Canadian family physicians.

Michael R Kolber1, Nicole Olivier2, Oksana Babenko3, Ryan Torrie4, Lee Green5.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether rural FP colonoscopists in Alberta are achieving benchmarks in colonoscopy quality.
DESIGN: Prospective, multicentre observational study.
SETTING: Alberta. PARTICIPANTS: Nine FP colonoscopists. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Proportion of successful cecal intubations; proportion of patients aged 50 and older with pathologically confirmed adenomas; mean number of adenomas per colonoscopy; and serious adverse events related to colonoscopy.
RESULTS: In this 6-month study, 9 rural FPs in Alberta performed 1769 colonoscopies. Overall, all key colonoscopy quality benchmarks were met or exceeded. The proportion of successful cecal intubations was 97.9% (95% CI 97.2% to 98.6%). The proportion of male and female patients aged 50 and older whose first-time colonoscopy results revealed an adenoma was 67.4% (95% CI 62.4% to 72.7%) and 51.1% (95% CI 45.5% to 56.7%), respectively. There were 120 adenomas, 36 advanced adenomas, and 1 colon cancer case per 100 colonoscopies. There were 2 postpolypectomy bleeds and no other serious complications.
CONCLUSION: Alberta rural FP colonoscopists are meeting benchmarks in colonoscopy quality. Ongoing electronic collection of endoscopy quality markers should be encouraged. Supporting and training rural FPs who perform endoscopy might help alleviate current wait times and improve access for rural Canadian patients. Copyright© the College of Family Physicians of Canada.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30541822      PMCID: PMC6371886     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Can Fam Physician        ISSN: 0008-350X            Impact factor:   3.275


  27 in total

1.  Complications of upper GI endoscopy.

Authors:  Glenn M Eisen; Todd H Baron; Jason A Dominitz; Douglas O Faigel; Jay L Goldstein; John F Johanson; J Shawn Mallery; Hareth M Raddawi; John J Vargo; J Patrick Waring; Robert D Fanelli; Jo Wheeler-Harbough
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 9.427

2.  Complications of colonoscopy.

Authors:  Jason A Dominitz; Glenn M Eisen; Todd H Baron; Jay L Goldstein; William K Hirota; Brian C Jacobson; John F Johanson; Jonathan A Leighton; J Shawn Mallery; Hareth M Raddawi; John J Vargo; J Patrick Waring; Robert D Fanelli; Jo Wheeler-Harbough; Douglas O Faigel
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 9.427

3.  Canadian Association of Gastroenterology consensus guidelines on safety and quality indicators in endoscopy.

Authors:  David Armstrong; Alan Barkun; Ron Bridges; Rose Carter; Chris de Gara; Catherine Dube; Robert Enns; Roger Hollingworth; Donald Macintosh; Mark Borgaonkar; Sylviane Forget; Grigorios Leontiadis; Jonathan Meddings; Peter Cotton; Ernst J Kuipers
Journal:  Can J Gastroenterol       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 3.522

Review 4.  Who provides gastrointestinal endoscopy in Canada?

Authors:  R J Hilsden; J Tepper; P Moayyedi; L Rabeneck
Journal:  Can J Gastroenterol       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 3.522

5.  Endoscopist specialty is associated with incident colorectal cancer after a negative colonoscopy.

Authors:  Linda Rabeneck; Lawrence F Paszat; Refik Saskin
Journal:  Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2009-10-29       Impact factor: 11.382

6.  Outcomes of 1949 endoscopic procedures: performed by a Canadian rural family physician.

Authors:  Michael Kolber; Olga Szafran; Juhee Suwal; Mark Diaz
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 3.275

Review 7.  Screening colonoscopies by primary care physicians: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Thad Wilkins; Bruce LeClair; Mark Smolkin; Kathy Davies; Andria Thomas; Marcia L Taylor; Scott Strayer
Journal:  Ann Fam Med       Date:  2009 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 5.166

8.  Adenoma detection rate and risk of colorectal cancer and death.

Authors:  Douglas A Corley; Christopher D Jensen; Amy R Marks; Wei K Zhao; Jeffrey K Lee; Chyke A Doubeni; Ann G Zauber; Jolanda de Boer; Bruce H Fireman; Joanne E Schottinger; Virginia P Quinn; Nirupa R Ghai; Theodore R Levin; Charles P Quesenberry
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2014-04-03       Impact factor: 91.245

9.  Population-Based Colonoscopy Screening for Colorectal Cancer: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Michael Bretthauer; Michal F Kaminski; Magnus Løberg; Ann G Zauber; Jaroslaw Regula; Ernst J Kuipers; Miguel A Hernán; Eleanor McFadden; Annike Sunde; Mette Kalager; Evelien Dekker; Iris Lansdorp-Vogelaar; Kjetil Garborg; Maciej Rupinski; Manon C W Spaander; Marek Bugajski; Ole Høie; Tryggvi Stefansson; Geir Hoff; Hans-Olov Adami
Journal:  JAMA Intern Med       Date:  2016-07-01       Impact factor: 21.873

10.  Prospective Study of the Quality of Colonoscopies Performed by Primary Care Physicians: The Alberta Primary Care Endoscopy (APC-Endo) Study.

Authors:  Michael R Kolber; Clarence K W Wong; Richard N Fedorak; Brian H Rowe
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-06-27       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  2 in total

1.  Quality of the screening process: An overlooked critical factor and an essential component of shared decision making about screening.

Authors:  James A Dickinson; Roland Grad; Brenda J Wilson; Neil R Bell; Harminder Singh; Olga Szafran; Guylène Thériault
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2019-05       Impact factor: 3.275

2. 

Authors:  James A Dickinson; Roland Grad; Brenda J Wilson; Neil R Bell; Harminder Singh; Olga Szafran; Guylène Thériault
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2019-05       Impact factor: 3.275

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.