Johanna M Uthoff1,2,3, Sarah L Mott3, Jared Larson1, Christine M Neslund-Dudas4,5, Ann G Schwartz6, Jessica C Sieren1,2,3. 1. Department of Radiology, University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa, United States. 2. Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa, United States. 3. Holden Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa, United States. 4. Department of Public Health Sciences, Henry Ford Health System, Detroit, Michigan, United States. 5. Henry Ford Cancer Institute, Henry Ford Health System, Detroit, Michigan, United States. 6. Karmanos Cancer Institute, Wayne State University, Detroit, Michigan, United States.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is a known comorbidity for lung cancer independent of smoking history. Quantitative computed tomography (qCT) imaging features related to COPD have shown promise in the assessment of lung cancer risk. We hypothesize that qCT features from the lung, lobe, and airway tree related to the location of the pulmonary nodule can be used to provide informative malignancy risk assessment. METHODS: A total of 183 qCT features were extracted from 278 individuals with a solitary pulmonary nodule of known diagnosis (71 malignant, 207 benign). These included histogram and airway characteristics of the lungs, lobe, and segmental paths. Performances of the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) regression analysis and an ensemble of neural networks (ENN) were compared for feature set selection and classification on a testing cohort of 49 additional individuals (15 malignant, 34 benign). RESULTS: The LASSO and ENN methods produced different feature sets for classification with LASSO selecting fewer qCT features (7) than the ENN (17). The LASSO model with the highest performing training area under the curve (AUC) (0.80) incorporated automatically extracted features and reader-measured nodule diameter with a testing AUC of 0.62. The ENN model with the highest performing AUC (0.77) also incorporated qCT and reader diameter but maintained higher testing performance AUC (0.79). CONCLUSIONS: Automatically extracted qCT imaging features of the lung can be informative of the differentiation between individuals with malignant pulmonary nodules and those with benign pulmonary nodules, without requiring nodule segmentation and analysis. JCOPDF
BACKGROUND: Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is a known comorbidity for lung cancer independent of smoking history. Quantitative computed tomography (qCT) imaging features related to COPD have shown promise in the assessment of lung cancer risk. We hypothesize that qCT features from the lung, lobe, and airway tree related to the location of the pulmonary nodule can be used to provide informative malignancy risk assessment. METHODS: A total of 183 qCT features were extracted from 278 individuals with a solitary pulmonary nodule of known diagnosis (71 malignant, 207 benign). These included histogram and airway characteristics of the lungs, lobe, and segmental paths. Performances of the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) regression analysis and an ensemble of neural networks (ENN) were compared for feature set selection and classification on a testing cohort of 49 additional individuals (15 malignant, 34 benign). RESULTS: The LASSO and ENN methods produced different feature sets for classification with LASSO selecting fewer qCT features (7) than the ENN (17). The LASSO model with the highest performing training area under the curve (AUC) (0.80) incorporated automatically extracted features and reader-measured nodule diameter with a testing AUC of 0.62. The ENN model with the highest performing AUC (0.77) also incorporated qCT and reader diameter but maintained higher testing performance AUC (0.79). CONCLUSIONS: Automatically extracted qCT imaging features of the lung can be informative of the differentiation between individuals with malignant pulmonary nodules and those with benign pulmonary nodules, without requiring nodule segmentation and analysis. JCOPDF
Authors: Annette McWilliams; Martin C Tammemagi; John R Mayo; Heidi Roberts; Geoffrey Liu; Kam Soghrati; Kazuhiro Yasufuku; Simon Martel; Francis Laberge; Michel Gingras; Sukhinder Atkar-Khattra; Christine D Berg; Ken Evans; Richard Finley; John Yee; John English; Paola Nasute; John Goffin; Serge Puksa; Lori Stewart; Scott Tsai; Michael R Johnston; Daria Manos; Garth Nicholas; Glenwood D Goss; Jean M Seely; Kayvan Amjadi; Alain Tremblay; Paul Burrowes; Paul MacEachern; Rick Bhatia; Ming-Sound Tsao; Stephen Lam Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2013-09-05 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: David S Gierada; Preethi Guniganti; Blake J Newman; Mark T Dransfield; Paul A Kvale; David A Lynch; Thomas K Pilgram Journal: Radiology Date: 2011-09-07 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: Ann G Schwartz; Christine M Lusk; Angela S Wenzlaff; Donovan Watza; Stephanie Pandolfi; Laura Mantha; Michele L Cote; Ayman O Soubani; Garrett Walworth; Antoinette Wozniak; Christine Neslund-Dudas; Amy A Ardisana; Michael J Flynn; Thomas Song; David L Spizarny; Paul A Kvale; Robert A Chapman; Shirish M Gadgeel Journal: Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev Date: 2016-07-06 Impact factor: 4.254
Authors: Kyungsoo Bae; Kyung Nyeo Jeon; Seung Jun Lee; Ho Cheol Kim; Ji Young Ha; Sung Eun Park; Hye Jin Baek; Bo Hwa Choi; Soo Buem Cho; Jin Il Moon Journal: Medicine (Baltimore) Date: 2016-11 Impact factor: 1.889
Authors: Jayashree Kalpathy-Cramer; Artem Mamomov; Binsheng Zhao; Lin Lu; Dmitry Cherezov; Sandy Napel; Sebastian Echegaray; Daniel Rubin; Michael McNitt-Gray; Pechin Lo; Jessica C Sieren; Johanna Uthoff; Samantha K N Dilger; Brandan Driscoll; Ivan Yeung; Lubomir Hadjiiski; Kenny Cha; Yoganand Balagurunathan; Robert Gillies; Dmitry Goldgof Journal: Tomography Date: 2016-12