| Literature DB >> 31083321 |
Raphaël Enaud1,2,3, Katarzyna B Hooks4,5, Aurélien Barre6,7, Thomas Barnetche8,9, Christophe Hubert10,11, Marie Massot12, Thomas Bazin13, Haude Clouzeau14, Stéphanie Bui15, Michael Fayon16,17,18, Patrick Berger19,20, Philippe Lehours21, Cécile Bébéar22,23, Macha Nikolski24,25, Thierry Lamireau26,27, Laurence Delhaes28,29, Thierry Schaeverbeke30,31,32.
Abstract
Cystic fibrosis (CF) is a systemic genetic disease that leads to pulmonary and digestive disorders. In the majority of CF patients, the intestine is the site of chronic inflammation and microbiota disturbances. The link between gut inflammation and microbiota dysbiosis is still poorly understood. The main objective of this study was to assess gut microbiota composition in CF children depending on their intestinal inflammation. We collected fecal samples from 20 children with CF. Fecal calprotectin levels were measured and fecal microbiota was analyzed by 16S rRNA sequencing. We observed intestinal inflammation was associated with microbiota disturbances characterized mainly by increased abundances of Staphylococcus, Streptococcus, and Veillonella dispar, along with decreased abundances of Bacteroides, Bifidobacterium adolescentis, and Faecalibacterium prausnitzii. Those changes exhibited similarities with that of Crohn's disease (CD), as evidenced by the elevated CD Microbial-Dysbiosis index that we applied for the first time in CF. Furthermore, the significant over-representation of Streptococcus in children with intestinal inflammation appears to be specific to CF and raises the issue of gut-lung axis involvement. Taken together, our results provide new arguments to link gut microbiota and intestinal inflammation in CF and suggest the key role of the gut-lung axis in the CF evolution.Entities:
Keywords: cystic fibrosis; dysbiosis index; fecal calprotectin; gut microbiota; intestinal inflammation
Year: 2019 PMID: 31083321 PMCID: PMC6572243 DOI: 10.3390/jcm8050645
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Clin Med ISSN: 2077-0383 Impact factor: 4.241
Characteristics of patients with and without intestinal inflammation.
| No Inflammatory Group | Inflammatory Group | |
|---|---|---|
|
| 13 (65%) | 7 (35%) |
|
| 122 (91.0–149.0) | 459 (324.5–925.0) |
|
| 9 (7.0–11.0) | 8 (7.5-11.5) |
|
| 7 (53.9%) | 3 (43%) |
|
| ||
| - F508del homozygous | 10 (77%) | 4 (57%) |
| - F508del heterozygous | 2 (15%) | 3 (43%) |
| - Others | 1 (8%) | 0 |
|
| 97.6 (94.0–108.0) | 98.3 (88.5–97.7) |
|
| 81(71.0–91.0) | 76 (71.5–93.5) |
|
| ||
| - | 1 (8%) | 0 |
| - | 11 (85%) | 7 (100%) |
|
| 0 (0–2) | 5 (0.5–10) |
|
| ||
| - Parents’ report | 81.9 (76.5–88.4) | 89.0 (86.7–90.4) |
| - Child’s report | 83.9 (71.9–89.2) | 85.1 (76.8–88.6) |
|
| ||
| - Parents’ report | 83.2 (80.6–90.7) | 94.5 (93.6–95.0) |
| - Child’s report | 84.5 (79.4–95.1) | 91.2 (88.7–98.1) |
|
| ||
| - %BMI † | 96.6 (90.6–105.9) | 97.6 (92.3–102.6) |
| - %BMI variation | −0.5 (−3.8–1.5) | −0.3 (-1.0–3.0) |
| - %FEV1 †† | 84.0 (71.2–95.2) | 83.5 (69.5–85.5) |
| - %FEV1 variation | 1 (−21.0–8.5) | 9 (-4.7–14.5) |
| - IV antibiotics | 2.5 (0.0–5.2) | 6.5 (5.2–9.2) |
| - Oral antibiotics | 1.5 (0.0–3.2) | 2 (2.0–2.7) |
| - Inhaled antibiotics + | 1 (1.0–1.2) | 2 (2.0–2.7) |
| - Total antibiotics + | 5 (3.7–8.2) | 11.5 (10.2–12.7) |
Data are presented as n (%) or median (interquartile interval); Abbreviations: BMI, body mass index; FEV1, Forced Expiratory Volume in 1s; IV, intravenous; + p < 0.05; † expressed as percent of the standard normalized by age; †† expressed as percent predicted; * Evaluated using PedsQLTM Generic Core Scale 4.0; •• Evaluated using PedsQL™ Gastrointestinal Symptoms Scales 3.0.
Figure 1Microbiota composition in the Cystic Fibrosis (CF) cohort. (A) Proportions of bacteria from the five most abundant phyla colored according to the legend. Calprotectin measurements per patient are shown in boxes below the bar plot. The proportion of Firmicutes was significantly higher in microbiota profiles of children with intestinal inflammation (gray boxes). (B) Alpha diversity values for all patients (n = 20) are shown as points and summarized as boxplots for each group. Both Shannon and Simpson alpha indices measure microbial diversity within sample, and they were not significantly different between children with and without intestinal inflammation (Wilcoxon-–Mann–Whitney test). (C) Beta diversity (NMDS), which assesses differences in microbial composition between samples using a NMDS ordination method with Bray–Curtis distance metric, showed a partial separation of samples of patients with intestinal inflammation.
Figure 2The composition of the microbiota differs according to the inflammation status of CF patients. (A) Differential abundance analysis (DESeq) assessing OTU significantly changed in the microbiome of patients with intestinal inflammation, compared with patients without intestinal inflammation. Each circle represents one of 80 significant OTUs colored by a phylum according to the legend. OTUs are collapsed to 25 taxa represented on x axis and ordered by decreasing log of fold change. For full results see Supplementary Table S2. (B) LEfSe analysis showing OTUs distinguishing patients without and with intestinal inflammation (p-value < 0.01) and confirming DESeq2 results. For full results see Supplementary Table S3.
Figure 3MD-index distribution in CF cohort according to the intestinal inflammation status. (A) Bacterial taxa contributing to the MD-index according to [32]. (B) Boxplot of MD-index values for patients separated into groups according to calprotectin level. Patients with CF intestinal inflammation have a significant higher MD-index (Wilcoxon–Mann–Whitney test, p = 0.03). For full results see Supplementary Table S4.
Figure 4Relative abundance of Boxplot of values representing relative proportion of S. oralis in patients’ microbiomes, separated into groups according to calprotectin level. Among Streptococcus found in CF children, there was a notable proportion of S. oralis but without significant difference between children with or without intestinal inflammation (Wilcoxon–Mann–Whitney test, p = 0.24).