| Literature DB >> 27245316 |
H Al-Momani1, A Perry2, C J Stewart3, R Jones1, A Krishnan1, A G Robertson1, S Bourke4, S Doe4, S P Cummings5, A Anderson4, T Forrest4, S M Griffin4, M Brodlie1, J Pearson1, C Ward1.
Abstract
Gastro-Oesophageal Reflux (GOR) is a key problem in Cystic Fibrosis (CF), but the relationship between lung and gastric microbiomes is not well understood. We hypothesised that CF gastric and lung microbiomes are related. Gastric and sputum cultures were obtained from fifteen CF patients receiving percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy feeding. Non-CF gastric juice data was obtained through endoscopy from 14 patients without lung disease. Bacterial and fungal isolates were identified by culture. Molecular bacterial profiling used next generation sequencing (NGS) of the 16S rRNA gene. Cultures grew bacteria and/or fungi in all CF gastric juice and sputa and in 9/14 non-CF gastric juices. Pseudomonas aeruginosa(Pa) was present in CF sputum in 11 patients, 4 had identical Pa strains in the stomach. NGS data from non-CF gastric juice samples were significantly more diverse compared to CF samples. NGS showed CF gastric juice had markedly lower abundance of normal gut bacteria; Bacteroides and Faecalibacterium, but increased Pseudomonas compared with non-CF. Multivariate partial least squares discriminant analysis demonstrated similar bacterial profiles of CF sputum and gastric juice samples, which were distinct from non-CF gastric juice. We provide novel evidence suggesting the existence of an aerodigestive microbiome in CF, which may have clinical relevance.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27245316 PMCID: PMC4887896 DOI: 10.1038/srep26985
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Demographic data for CF patients.
| Patient | Genetics | Age | RSI score | PPI yes/no | Gastric Juice pH | FEV1 (% pred) | BMI | IV days /year | Long-term antibiotic |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CF-1 | F508del/F508del | 26 | 17 | Yes | 6 | 2.0L (52%) | 19.9 | 22 | Azith Inh Coli Inh Tob |
| CF-2 | F508del/F508del | 27 | 20 | Yes | 2 | 1.7 (42%) | 23.2 | 70 | Azith Fluclox Inh coli |
| CF-3 | F508del/F508del | 20 | 25 | Ranitidine | 3 | 0.8L (26%) | 19.5 | 28 | Azith Fluclox Inh Coli |
| CF-4 | F508del/F508del | 24 | 36 | Yes | 6 | 0.76L (28%) | 19 | 154 | Azith Inh Coli |
| CF-5 | F508del/F508del | 41 | NA [died] | Yes | 5.5 | 0.45L (18%) | 18.2 | 65 | Azith Inh Tob |
| CF-6 | F508del/F508del | 31 | 16 | Yes | 6 | 0.5L (12%) | 19.1 | 70 | Azith Inh Coli |
| CF-7 | F508del/ R117H | 22 | 16 | Yes | 3 | 2.7L (66%) | 16.4 | 14 | Fluclox |
| CF-8 | I507del/ Arg560Lys | 18 | 13 | Yes | 2 | 3.5L (88%) | 19.4 | 37 | Fluclox Inh Coli Inh Tob |
| CF-9 | F508del/R117H | 30 | 14 | Yes | 6 | 1.55L (46%) | 17.8 | 56 | Fluclox Inh Coli |
| CF-10 | F508del/F508del | 25 | 17 | Yes | 2 | 1.7L (38%) | 15.9 | 98 | Azith Fluclox Inh Tob |
| CF-11 | F508del/G542X | 32 | NA [PEG removed] | No | 2 | 1.15L (36%) | 19.4 | 112 | Azith Inh Coli |
| CF-12 | F508del/F508del | 30 | 19 | Yes | 6 | 1.2L (29%) | 19.8 | 115 | Azith Fluclox Inh Coli |
| CF-13 | F508del/G542X | 24 | 15 | Yes | 2 | 1.65L (36%) | 15.24 | 197 | Azith Inh Coli Inh Tob |
| CF-14 | F508del/ Arg851Ter | 23 | 22 | Yes | 6 | 2.3L (59%) | 20.2 | 56 | Azith |
| CF-15 | G542X/G551D | 22 | NA [moved country] | Yes | 2 | 0.85L (28%) | 18 | 42 | Azith Inh Coli |
Azith = oral azithromycin long-term. Fluclox = oral flucloxacillin long-term. Inh Coli = inhaled colistin (nebulised or inhaler). Inh Tob = inhaled tobramycin (nebulised or inhaler). RSI score = Reflux symptom index score, <13 normal. NA = not available.
Demographic data for the non-CF patients.
| Patient No | Age/yrs | Background disease | PPI yes/no* | Gastric juice pH |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 75 | Oesophagitis | yes | 2.4 |
| 2 | 56 | Oesophagitis and Pyloroplasty | yes | 6.6 |
| 3 | 65 | Barrett’s Oesophagus and Hiatus Hernia | no | 4.8 |
| 4 | 59 | Hiatus Hernia | yes | 2 |
| 5 | 45 | Oesophagitis and Hiatus Hernia | n/a | 1.4 |
| 6 | 42 | Gastritis and Hiatus Hernia | yes | 5.5 |
| 7 | 58 | Oesophagitis and Hiatus Hernia | yes | 4 |
| 8 | 80 | Not known | n/a | 4.7 |
| 9 | 50 | Gastric ulcer | yes | 8.4 |
| 10 | 78 | Gastritis and Hiatus Hernia | n/a | 1.6 |
| 11 | 73 | Barrett’s Oesophagus | yes | 5.1 |
| 12 | 55 | Not known | n/a | 5.2 |
| 13 | 68 | Duodenal ulcer | n/a | 6 |
| 14 | 65 | Gastritis | n/a | 1.7 |
All patients were off PPI or any other acid suppression medication 2 weeks before endoscopy procedure.
Figure 1(A) Bar plot showing the relative abundance of each operational taxonomic unit (OTU) within non-CF gastric juice (GJ), CF gastric juice (CFGJ), and sputum samples (CFS). (B) Shannon Diversity Index of CF samples (CFGJ and CFS) and non-CF GJ.
Figure 2Partial least square discriminant analysis (PLS-DA) score scatter plot of all samples.
Non-CF gastric juice – GJ; CF gastric juice – CFGJ; Sputum samples – CFS. The Axes represent a % of variance. The CF gastric juice and sputum samples show a close relationship. In contrast the Gastric Juice samples from control patients are widely variable and clearly distinct from the CF sputum and gastric juice clustering.