Frank J Elgar1, Genevieve Gariepy2,3, Melanie Dirks1, Sophie D Walsh4, Michal Molcho5, Alina Cosma6, Marta Malinowska-Cieslik7, Peter D Donnelly8, Wendy Craig9. 1. Institute for Health and Social Policy, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada. 2. Douglas Mental Health University Institute, Montreal, Quebec, Canada. 3. Now with Department of Social and Preventive Medicine, University of Montreal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada. 4. Department of Criminology, Bar Ian University, Ramat Gan, Israel. 5. School of Health Sciences, National University of Ireland Galway, Galway, Ireland. 6. Department of Interdisciplinary Social Sciences, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands. 7. Department of Environmental Health, Health Sciences Faculty, Jagiellonian University Medical College, Krakow, Poland. 8. Department of Public Health Sciences, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada. 9. Department of Psychology, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada.
Abstract
Importance: While the association between income inequality and interpersonal violence has been attributed to the psychosocial effects of inequality (eg, increased class anxiety, reduced social capital), longitudinal evidence for this pathway is limited by a reliance on small ecological studies and cross-sectional data. The developmental consequences of early-life inequality for subsequent involvement in violence have not been investigated. Objective: To examine the association between income inequality during infancy and early childhood and adolescents' involvement in bullying others, experiences of being bullied, or both. Design, Setting, and Participants: The Health Behavior in School-aged Children survey study was conducted in European and North American schools. This analysis used individual data on bullying (being bullied, bullying others, or both) from 6 consecutive school-based surveys of 11-year-old to 15-year-old students carried out in 40 countries between February 1994 to March 2014. Data analysis occurred from March 2018 to January 2019. Exposure: National Gini indices of income inequality for every year of life spanning a 35-year period (1979 to 2014). Main Outcomes and Measures: Being bullied, bullying others, and both outcomes were measured using a common definition and questions adapted from the Bully-Victim Questionnaire and translated to many languages. Results: The sample included 425 938 male students and 448 265 female students from 162 country-survey year groups in 29 196 schools. Linear regression coefficients indicated that early-life income inequality from birth to 4 years was positively associated with being bullied (male students: linear regression coefficient, 18.26 [95% CI, 11.04-25.47]; P < .001; female students: linear regression coefficient, 15.67 [95% CI, 10.02-21.33]; P < .001), and dual involvement in being bullied and bullying others (male students: linear regression coefficient, 5.55 [95% CI, 2.67-8.44]; P < .001; female students: linear regression coefficient, 2.45 [95% CI, 0.93-3.97]; P < .001), after differences in lifetime mean income inequality (from birth to when bullying was measured), national per capita income, family socioeconomic position, age, and cohort were controlled. No such association was found with bullying others after differences in being bullied were controlled. Conclusions and Relevance: Being bullied is associated with early-life exposure to income inequality. Although further research on the underlying pathways is needed to guide intervention, these results suggest temporality in the association between inequality and violence and suggest that growing up in areas of high income inequality is associated with victimization in adolescence.
Importance: While the association between income inequality and interpersonal violence has been attributed to the psychosocial effects of inequality (eg, increased class anxiety, reduced social capital), longitudinal evidence for this pathway is limited by a reliance on small ecological studies and cross-sectional data. The developmental consequences of early-life inequality for subsequent involvement in violence have not been investigated. Objective: To examine the association between income inequality during infancy and early childhood and adolescents' involvement in bullying others, experiences of being bullied, or both. Design, Setting, and Participants: The Health Behavior in School-aged Children survey study was conducted in European and North American schools. This analysis used individual data on bullying (being bullied, bullying others, or both) from 6 consecutive school-based surveys of 11-year-old to 15-year-old students carried out in 40 countries between February 1994 to March 2014. Data analysis occurred from March 2018 to January 2019. Exposure: National Gini indices of income inequality for every year of life spanning a 35-year period (1979 to 2014). Main Outcomes and Measures: Being bullied, bullying others, and both outcomes were measured using a common definition and questions adapted from the Bully-Victim Questionnaire and translated to many languages. Results: The sample included 425 938 male students and 448 265 female students from 162 country-survey year groups in 29 196 schools. Linear regression coefficients indicated that early-life income inequality from birth to 4 years was positively associated with being bullied (male students: linear regression coefficient, 18.26 [95% CI, 11.04-25.47]; P < .001; female students: linear regression coefficient, 15.67 [95% CI, 10.02-21.33]; P < .001), and dual involvement in being bullied and bullying others (male students: linear regression coefficient, 5.55 [95% CI, 2.67-8.44]; P < .001; female students: linear regression coefficient, 2.45 [95% CI, 0.93-3.97]; P < .001), after differences in lifetime mean income inequality (from birth to when bullying was measured), national per capita income, family socioeconomic position, age, and cohort were controlled. No such association was found with bullying others after differences in being bullied were controlled. Conclusions and Relevance: Being bullied is associated with early-life exposure to income inequality. Although further research on the underlying pathways is needed to guide intervention, these results suggest temporality in the association between inequality and violence and suggest that growing up in areas of high income inequality is associated with victimization in adolescence.
Authors: Andre Sourander; Peter Jensen; John A Rönning; Solja Niemelä; Hans Helenius; Lauri Sillanmäki; Kirsti Kumpulainen; Jorma Piha; Tuula Tamminen; Irma Moilanen; Fredrik Almqvist Journal: Pediatrics Date: 2007-08 Impact factor: 7.124
Authors: Pernille Due; Juan Merlo; Yossi Harel-Fisch; Mogens Trab Damsgaard; Bjørn E Holstein; Jørn Hetland; Candace Currie; Saoirse Nic Gabhainn; Margarida Gaspar de Matos; John Lynch Journal: Am J Public Health Date: 2009-03-19 Impact factor: 9.308
Authors: George C Patton; Susan M Sawyer; John S Santelli; David A Ross; Rima Afifi; Nicholas B Allen; Monika Arora; Peter Azzopardi; Wendy Baldwin; Christopher Bonell; Ritsuko Kakuma; Elissa Kennedy; Jaqueline Mahon; Terry McGovern; Ali H Mokdad; Vikram Patel; Suzanne Petroni; Nicola Reavley; Kikelomo Taiwo; Jane Waldfogel; Dakshitha Wickremarathne; Carmen Barroso; Zulfiqar Bhutta; Adesegun O Fatusi; Amitabh Mattoo; Judith Diers; Jing Fang; Jane Ferguson; Frederick Ssewamala; Russell M Viner Journal: Lancet Date: 2016-05-09 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Gregory Farmer; Sheila W MacDonald; Shelby S Yamamoto; Chris Wilkes; Roman Pabayo Journal: J Can Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry Date: 2022-08-01