OBJECTIVES: We examined the socioeconomic distribution of adolescent exposure to bullying internationally and documented the contribution of the macroeconomic environment. METHODS: We used an international survey of 162,305 students aged 11, 13, and 15 years from nationally representative samples of 5998 schools in 35 countries in Europe and North America for the 2001-2002 school year. The survey used standardized measures of exposure to bullying and socioeconomic affluence. RESULTS: Adolescents from families of low affluence reported higher prevalence of being victims of bullying (odds ratio [OR] = 1.13; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.10, 1.16). International differences in prevalence of exposure to bullying were not associated with the economic level of the country (as measured by gross national income) or the school, but wide disparities in affluence at a school and large economic inequality (as measured by the Gini coefficient) at the national level were associated with an increased prevalence of exposure to bullying. CONCLUSIONS: There is socioeconomic inequality in exposure to bullying among adolescents, leaving children of greater socioeconomic disadvantage at higher risk of victimization. Adolescents who attend schools and live in countries where socioeconomic differences are larger are at higher risk of being bullied.
OBJECTIVES: We examined the socioeconomic distribution of adolescent exposure to bullying internationally and documented the contribution of the macroeconomic environment. METHODS: We used an international survey of 162,305 students aged 11, 13, and 15 years from nationally representative samples of 5998 schools in 35 countries in Europe and North America for the 2001-2002 school year. The survey used standardized measures of exposure to bullying and socioeconomic affluence. RESULTS: Adolescents from families of low affluence reported higher prevalence of being victims of bullying (odds ratio [OR] = 1.13; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.10, 1.16). International differences in prevalence of exposure to bullying were not associated with the economic level of the country (as measured by gross national income) or the school, but wide disparities in affluence at a school and large economic inequality (as measured by the Gini coefficient) at the national level were associated with an increased prevalence of exposure to bullying. CONCLUSIONS: There is socioeconomic inequality in exposure to bullying among adolescents, leaving children of greater socioeconomic disadvantage at higher risk of victimization. Adolescents who attend schools and live in countries where socioeconomic differences are larger are at higher risk of being bullied.
Authors: A Andersen; R Krølner; C Currie; L Dallago; P Due; M Richter; A Orkényi; B E Holstein Journal: J Epidemiol Community Health Date: 2008-04-15 Impact factor: 3.710
Authors: Frank J Elgar; Kate E Pickett; William Pickett; Wendy Craig; Michal Molcho; Klaus Hurrelmann; Michela Lenzi Journal: Int J Public Health Date: 2012-06-20 Impact factor: 3.380
Authors: Grace Yau; Mark Schluchter; H Gerry Taylor; Seunghee Margevicius; Christopher B Forrest; Laura Andreias; Dennis Drotar; Eric Youngstrom; Maureen Hack Journal: Early Hum Dev Date: 2012-12-27 Impact factor: 2.079
Authors: Frank J Elgar; Genevieve Gariepy; Melanie Dirks; Sophie D Walsh; Michal Molcho; Alina Cosma; Marta Malinowska-Cieslik; Peter D Donnelly; Wendy Craig Journal: JAMA Pediatr Date: 2019-07-01 Impact factor: 16.193