| Literature DB >> 31078141 |
Muntsa Rocafort1,2, Marc Noguera-Julian1,2,3, Javier Rivera1,3, Lucía Pastor2,4,5,6, Yolanda Guillén1,2, Jost Langhorst7,8, Mariona Parera1,2, Inacio Mandomando6, Jorge Carrillo1,2, Víctor Urrea1,2, Cristina Rodríguez1,2, Maria Casadellà1,2, Maria Luz Calle3, Bonaventura Clotet1,2,3,9, Julià Blanco1,2,3,5, Denise Naniche4,6, Roger Paredes10,11,12,13.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: In rhesus macaques, simian immunodeficiency virus infection is followed by expansion of enteric viruses but has a limited impact on the gut bacteriome. To understand the longitudinal effects of HIV-1 infection on the human gut microbiota, we prospectively followed 49 Mozambican subjects diagnosed with recent HIV-1 infection (RHI) and 54 HIV-1-negative controls for 9-18 months and compared them with 98 chronically HIV-1-infected subjects treated with antiretrovirals (n = 27) or not (n = 71).Entities:
Keywords: AIDS; HIV-1; HIV-1 pathogenesis; Microbiome; acute HIV-1 infection
Mesh:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31078141 PMCID: PMC6511141 DOI: 10.1186/s40168-019-0687-5
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Microbiome ISSN: 2049-2618 Impact factor: 14.650
Baseline subject’s characteristics
| Recent HIV-1 infection | Chronic HIV-1 infection | HIV-Negative | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ART-naive | On ART | RHI vs neg | Overall | ||||
| N = 202 | 49 | 71 | 27 | 55 | |||
| Female gender | 32 (65%) | 52 (73%) | 15 (55%) | 43 (78%) | 0.189 | 0.154 | |
| Age (years) | 26 (20; 30) | 35 (29; 45.5) | 42 (36.5; 46.5) | 25 (21; 37) | 0.210 | < 0.001 | |
| Weight (kg) | 55 (49; 62) | 63 (53.5; 68.5) | 61 (60; 68.5) | 58.5 (52; 67) | 0.093 | 0.007 | |
| Height (cm) | 160 (155; 169.7) | 160 (154.2; 164) | 164 (157.5; 167.5) | 163.9 (160; 170.8) | 0.192 | 0.025 | |
| BMI | 21 (19.1; 23.5) | 23.7 (21; 27.6) | 23.3 (21.5; 25) | 22.2 (18.5; 25) | 0.637 | < 0.001 | |
| Pregnancy | 3 (6.1%) | 0 | 0 | 7 (12.7%) | 0.730 | 0.003 | |
| CD4+ T cell/mm3 | 572 (409; 677) | 533 (430.5; 726) | 460 (366; 594.5) | 928 (741; 1142.8) | < 0.001 | < 0.001 | |
| CD8+ T cell/mm3 | 1229 (740; 1683) | 988 (763.5; 1304) | 834 (657.5; 1130) | 591 (387.5; 689.7) | < 0.001 | < 0.001 | |
| CD4+/CD8+ | 0.42 (0.23; 0.70) | 0.56 (0.38; 0.79) | 0.52 (0.33; 0.88) | 1.65 (1.21; 2.24) | < 0.001 | < 0.001 | |
| HIV-1 RNA at timepoint 1 (copies/mL) | 108,220 (31,898; 273,650) | 33,400 (7288; 105,200) | 75 (75; 272.5) | – | – | < 0.001 | |
| HIV-1 RNA at screening (copies/ml) | 2,752,700 (179,220; 15,078,000) | – | – | – | – | – | |
| Time since HIV-1-diagnosis, days | – | 1344 (977; 1737) | 1814 (1463; 2302) | – | – | 0.018 | |
| Time on ART, days | – | – | 1257 (678; 1640) | – | – | – | |
| Fiebig stage at screening* | III | 24 (49%) | – | – | – | – | |
| IV | 7 (14.2%) | – | – | – | – | ||
| V | 7 (14.2%) | – | – | – | – | ||
| VI | 11 (22.6%) | – | – | – | – | ||
| White blood cells | 5.8 (4.4; 6.7) | 5.2 (4.2; 6.4) | 3.7 (3.2; 5) | 5.2 (4.4; 6.5) | 0.413 | < 0.001 | |
| Hemoglobin | 12.1 (10.9; 13.1) | 11.8 (10.4; 12.7) | 11.4 (10.8; 12.7) | 12.3 (11.6; 13.2) | 0.409 | 0.114 | |
| Hematocrite | 36.9 (33.5; 39.8) | 35.6 (32.7; 38.5) | 34.4 (33; 38) | 37.7 (34.7; 40.1) | 0.320 | 0.044 | |
| Platelets | 184.5 (140.7; 230.7) | 205 (174.5; 258) | 192 (173.5; 216) | 226 (185; 265.5) | 0.004 | 0.028 | |
| Hepatitis B | 4 (8.1%) | 2 (2.8%) | 3 (11.1%) | 1 (1.8%) | 0.173 | 0.125 | |
| Syphilis | 2 (4.1%) | 0 | 1 (3.7%) | 4 (7.3%) | 0.682 | 0.089 | |
| Diarrhea, previous week | 7 (14.3%) | 3 (4.2%) | 1 (3.7%) | 4 (7.3%) | 0.343 | 0.214 | |
| Temperature (°C) | 36.3 (36.2; 36.5) | 36.4 (36.2; 36.4) | 36.4 (36.2; 36.4) | 36.2 (36.1; 36.5) | 0.956 | 0.509 | |
| Fever, previous 24 h | 7 (14.3%) | 3 (4.2%) | 1 (3.7%) | 3 (5.4%) | 0.186 | 0.186 | |
| Ritchie test | 2 (4.1%) | 2 (2.8%) | 0 | 1 (1.81%) | 0.600 | 0.864 | |
|
| 2 (4.1%) | 6 (8.4%) | 1 (3.7%) | 2 (3.6%) | 1 | 0.733 | |
| 2 (4.1%) | 2 (2.8%) | 0 | 5 (9.1%) | 0.438 | 0.236 | ||
| 0 | 2 (2.8%) | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0.635 | ||
|
| 2 (4.1%) | 0 | 1 (3.7%) | 1 (1.8%) | 0.602 | 0.458 | |
|
| 1 (2.0%) | 0 | 0 | 1 (1.8%) | 1 | 0.636 | |
| Malaria, prev. month | 7 (14.3%) | 1 (1.4%) | 0 | 9 (16.4%) | 1 | < 0.001 | |
| Current malaria test | 2 (4.1%) | 1 (1.4%) | 0 | 0 | – | 0.071 | |
| Malaria test severity | 3 (1.5; 3) | 4 (4; 4) | NA | NA | – | 0.071 | |
Differences in continuous variables were evaluated using ANOVA test (except for the time since HIV-1 diagnosis, which is evaluated using a Student T test). Differences in categorical variables were tested using the Fisher's test. The statistical significance threshold was set to P = 0.05
*Fiebig stage determination at screening visit is described in [30]. Malaria test was only performed in subjects reporting febrile symptoms. Malaria severity is measured in a scale of 1 to 5, from light to severe
Fig. 1Microbial genus richness and diversity indices obtained with 16S rRNA gene sequencing. a Median ± IQR values in different cross-sectional comparison groups. Kruskal–Wallis p values are shown at the bottom of each plot. Asterisks (p values *< 0.1 and **< 0.05) highlight statistically significant Tukey post hoc pairwise differences between groups, corrected for multiple comparisons (FDR < 0.05). b, c Linear mixed models of the dynamics of richness and diversity indices in recently HIV-infected (RHI, red) and HIV-negative (NEG, green) subjects over time. Horizontal axes show months after study enrollment. Each dot corresponds to a sample, and samples from the same individual through follow-up are line-connected. Single dots correspond to individuals with no longitudinal follow-up. Thick black lines correspond to the modeled slope of each parameter. Vertical dashed lines show the inflection point at month 6 used for modelling in b and c. Statistically, significant differences from 0 (flat slope) are shown with asterisks. p values *< 0.1 and **< 0.05
Fig. 2Differences in bacterial genera between groups. Box plots show median (± IQR) abundance of bacterial genera. Bacterial genera named “unclassified” are identified by their closest taxonomic level identification. Only bacterial genera with a significantly different abundance between groups (Kruskal–Wallis p value < 0.05) are shown. Statistically significant post hoc pairwise differences (Tukey post hoc pairwise tests corrected for multiple comparisons, FDR < 0.05) are shown with asterisks. Only the first microbiome measurement obtained RHI < 6, RHI > 6, and NEG was used for cross-sectional comparisons with CHI_ART and CHI_noART
Fig. 3Dynamics of bacterial clusters following HIV-1 infection. a Within group co-abundant bacterial genus clusters (SP1 to 7) obtained using 16S rRNA gene sequencing. The color gradient is proportional to the mean of scaled individual relative abundance values (mean = 0, sd = 1) per bacterial genera and study group. Dots show statistically significant differences in genus abundance relative to HIV-negative subjects (NEG). b Linear mixed models of the longitudinal evolution of bacterial clusters in subjects with recent HIV-1 infection (RHI) and HIV-negative (NEG) individuals. Horizontal axes show months after study enrollment. Each dot corresponds to a sample, and samples from the same individual through follow-up are line-connected. Single dots correspond to individuals with no longitudinal follow-up. Thick black lines correspond to the modeled slope of each bacterial cluster. Statistically significant differences from 0 (flat slope) are shown with asterisks. p values *< 0.1 and **< 0.05. c Spearman’s correlation between bacterial clusters and immune markers measured in blood. The color gradient is proportional to the Spearman’s rho value. Only unadjusted statistically significant correlations (p value < 0.05) are shown. CHI_ART, CHI_noART, and first available samples from individuals in any of the RHI < 6, RHI > 6, and NEG groups were used to compute correlation values. Other immune markers measured in blood include IgA, IgM, IgG2, and IgG4 for serological makers; EndoCab IgG and IgA ASCA for gut permeability; FABP2 for bacterial translocation; IL7, IL13, GCSF, RANTES, MIP1 alpha, and beta for T cell function; IFN gamma, TNF alpha, and IL8 for Th1 pro-inflammatory responses; TGF beta for anti-inflammatory responses; CD40 ligand and IL21 for B cell function, Eotaxin, IL5, sCD163, and IL15 for innate cells; CXCL16 and IL1 beta for inflammation; B7H1, PDL2, and IL2R for immune activation; and EGF and VEGF for angiogenesis. Several markers were also measured in feces although none of them showed significant correlations with bacterial clusters: sIgA, ANCA, and ASCA for serological markers; EDNEPX, calprotectin, PMNE, lactoferrin, and S100A12 for neutrophil and eosinophil activation; and HBD2, zonulin, and alpha 1 antitrypsin for enterocyte damage and gut permeability. No correlations were found between bacterial clusters and levels of CD4+ and CD8+ T cell activation, exhaustion, and senescence in blood.
Fig. 4Microbial gene richness in recently HIV-1-infected and HIV-negative subjects using shotgun metagenomics. a The leftmost density plot shows a bimodal distribution of all samples according to their observed gene richness value, which enables their classification into low (LGC) and high gene count (HGC). The rightmost density plot shows that HGCs are enriched in NEG, whereas RHI predominate in LGCs. b Longitudinal evolution of microbial gene richness in RHI (in red) and NEG (in green). Each box represents an individual with its longitudinal follow-up samples (timepoints 1, 4, and 9). The dark gray-colored area represents the LGC zone, whereas light gray-colored area represents the HGC zone
Fig. 5Evolution of richness-associated microbial species in recently HIV-1-infected vs. HIV-negative subjects using shotgun metagenomics. a Microbial species significantly (p < 0.05) associated with microbial gene richness in both study groups, Spearman’s correlation rho values (red is for positive, blue is for negative correlation). b Relative abundance of richness-associated bacterial species over time (months 1, 4, and 9). p values within each box compare month 1 to 4 area under the curves of subjects with recent HIV-1 infection (RHI) versus HIV-negative individuals (NEG). Asterisks show slope values significantly different from 0 in linear mixed models for each bacteria and study group
Prevalence of fecal virus shedding
| Recent HIV-1 infection | Chronic HIV-1 infection | HIV-negative | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ART-naive | On ART | |||
| Adenovirus | 26/49 (53.2%)** | 36/71 (50.7%)** | 12/27(44.4%)** | 11/55 (20.0%) |
| Cytomegalovirus | 3/49 (6.1%) | 4/71 (5.6%)* | 1/27 (3.7%) | 1/55 (1.8%) |
| Enterovirus | 1/43 (2.4%) | 4/19 (21.1%)* | 1/25 (4.0%) | 2/45 (4.4%) |
| Human herpes virus 6A, 6B, and 8 | 0/49 (0%) | 0/71 (0%) | 0/71 (0%) | 0/55 (0%) |
Numbers (percent) of subjects with detectable virus in feces by qualitative commercial real-time PCR. To avoid ascertainment bias due to different follow-up between groups, only the first fecal sample available for testing is used for comparison
*p < 0.1, **p < 0.05; Fisher’s pairwise comparisons relative to HIV-1 negative