Literature DB >> 31077390

Projection-domain scatter correction for cone beam computed tomography using a residual convolutional neural network.

Yusuke Nomura1, Qiong Xu2, Hiroki Shirato2,3, Shinichi Shimizu2,4, Lei Xing2,5.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Scatter is a major factor degrading the image quality of cone beam computed tomography (CBCT). Conventional scatter correction strategies require handcrafted analytical models with ad hoc assumptions, which often leads to less accurate scatter removal. This study aims to develop an effective scatter correction method using a residual convolutional neural network (CNN).
METHODS: A U-net based 25-layer CNN was constructed for CBCT scatter correction. The establishment of the model consists of three steps: model training, validation, and testing. For model training, a total of 1800 pairs of x-ray projection and the corresponding scatter-only distribution in nonanthropomorphic phantoms taken in full-fan scan were generated using Monte Carlo simulation of a CBCT scanner installed with a proton therapy system. An end-to-end CNN training was implemented with two major loss functions for 100 epochs with a mini-batch size of 10. Image rotations and flips were randomly applied to augment the training datasets during training. For validation, 200 projections of a digital head phantom were collected. The proposed CNN-based method was compared to a conventional projection-domain scatter correction method named fast adaptive scatter kernel superposition (fASKS) method using 360 projections of an anthropomorphic head phantom. Two different loss functions were applied for the same CNN to evaluate the impact of loss functions on the final results. Furthermore, the CNN model trained with full-fan projections was fine-tuned for scatter correction in half-fan scan by using transfer learning with additional 360 half-fan projection pairs of nonanthropomorphic phantoms. The tuned-CNN model for half-fan scan was compared with the fASKS method as well as the CNN-based method without the fine-tuning using additional lung phantom projections.
RESULTS: The CNN-based method provides projections with significantly reduced scatter and CBCT images with more accurate Hounsfield Units (HUs) than that of the fASKS-based method. Root mean squared error of the CNN-corrected projections was improved to 0.0862 compared to 0.278 for uncorrected projections or 0.117 for the fASKS-corrected projections. The CNN-corrected reconstruction provided better HU quantification, especially in regions near the air or bone interfaces. All four image quality measures, which include mean absolute error (MAE), mean squared error (MSE), peak signal-to-noise ratio (PSNR), and structural similarity (SSIM), indicated that the CNN-corrected images were significantly better than that of the fASKS-corrected images. Moreover, the proposed transfer learning technique made it possible for the CNN model trained with full-fan projections to be applicable to remove scatters in half-fan projections after fine-tuning with only a small number of additional half-fan training datasets. SSIM value of the tuned-CNN-corrected images was 0.9993 compared to 0.9984 for the non-tuned-CNN-corrected images or 0.9990 for the fASKS-corrected images. Finally, the CNN-based method is computationally efficient - the correction time for the 360 projections only took less than 5 s in the reported experiments on a PC (4.20 GHz Intel Core-i7 CPU) with a single NVIDIA GTX 1070 GPU.
CONCLUSIONS: The proposed deep learning-based method provides an effective tool for CBCT scatter correction and holds significant value for quantitative imaging and image-guided radiation therapy.
© 2019 American Association of Physicists in Medicine.

Entities:  

Keywords:  CBCT; IGRT; convolutional neural network; quantitative imaging; scatter correction

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31077390      PMCID: PMC6684491          DOI: 10.1002/mp.13583

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Phys        ISSN: 0094-2405            Impact factor:   4.071


  33 in total

1.  Efficient object scatter correction algorithm for third and fourth generation CT scanners.

Authors:  B Ohnesorge; T Flohr; K Klingenbeck-Regn
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 5.315

2.  X-ray scatter correction algorithm for cone beam CT imaging.

Authors:  Ruola Ning; Xiangyang Tang; David Conover
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 4.071

3.  Image quality assessment: from error visibility to structural similarity.

Authors:  Zhou Wang; Alan Conrad Bovik; Hamid Rahim Sheikh; Eero P Simoncelli
Journal:  IEEE Trans Image Process       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 10.856

4.  Improved scatter correction using adaptive scatter kernel superposition.

Authors:  M Sun; J M Star-Lack
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2010-10-28       Impact factor: 3.609

5.  Monte Carlo evaluation of scatter mitigation strategies in cone-beam CT.

Authors:  Dimitrios Lazos; Jeffrey F Williamson
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 4.071

6.  Sensitivity study for CT image use in Monte Carlo treatment planning.

Authors:  Frank Verhaegen; Slobodan Devic
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2005-02-17       Impact factor: 3.609

7.  An efficient Monte Carlo-based algorithm for scatter correction in keV cone-beam CT.

Authors:  G Poludniowski; P M Evans; V N Hansen; S Webb
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2009-06-02       Impact factor: 3.609

8.  Scatter kernel estimation with an edge-spread function method for cone-beam computed tomography imaging.

Authors:  Heng Li; Radhe Mohan; X Ronald Zhu
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2008-11-07       Impact factor: 3.609

9.  SpekCalc: a program to calculate photon spectra from tungsten anode x-ray tubes.

Authors:  G Poludniowski; G Landry; F DeBlois; P M Evans; F Verhaegen
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2009-09-01       Impact factor: 3.609

10.  Scatter correction for cone-beam CT in radiation therapy.

Authors:  Lei Zhu; Yaoqin Xie; Jing Wang; Lei Xing
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 4.071

View more
  14 in total

1.  Improving CBCT quality to CT level using deep learning with generative adversarial network.

Authors:  Yang Zhang; Ning Yue; Min-Ying Su; Bo Liu; Yi Ding; Yongkang Zhou; Hao Wang; Yu Kuang; Ke Nie
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2021-05-14       Impact factor: 4.071

2.  Improving dose calculation accuracy in preclinical radiation experiments using multi-energy element resolved cone-beam CT.

Authors:  Yanqi Huang; Xiaoyu Hu; Yuncheng Zhong; Youfang Lai; Chenyang Shen; Xun Jia
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2021-12-06       Impact factor: 3.609

Review 3.  An introduction to deep learning in medical physics: advantages, potential, and challenges.

Authors:  Chenyang Shen; Dan Nguyen; Zhiguo Zhou; Steve B Jiang; Bin Dong; Xun Jia
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2020-03-03       Impact factor: 3.609

4.  CBCT-based synthetic CT generation using deep-attention cycleGAN for pancreatic adaptive radiotherapy.

Authors:  Yingzi Liu; Yang Lei; Tonghe Wang; Yabo Fu; Xiangyang Tang; Walter J Curran; Tian Liu; Pretesh Patel; Xiaofeng Yang
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2020-03-28       Impact factor: 4.071

5.  Human-level comparable control volume mapping with a deep unsupervised-learning model for image-guided radiation therapy.

Authors:  Xiaokun Liang; Maxime Bassenne; Dimitre H Hristov; Md Tauhidul Islam; Wei Zhao; Mengyu Jia; Zhicheng Zhang; Michael Gensheimer; Beth Beadle; Quynh Le; Lei Xing
Journal:  Comput Biol Med       Date:  2021-12-17       Impact factor: 4.589

Review 6.  A review on medical imaging synthesis using deep learning and its clinical applications.

Authors:  Tonghe Wang; Yang Lei; Yabo Fu; Jacob F Wynne; Walter J Curran; Tian Liu; Xiaofeng Yang
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2020-12-11       Impact factor: 2.102

Review 7.  Machine learning applications in radiation oncology.

Authors:  Matthew Field; Nicholas Hardcastle; Michael Jameson; Noel Aherne; Lois Holloway
Journal:  Phys Imaging Radiat Oncol       Date:  2021-06-24

Review 8.  Roadmap: proton therapy physics and biology.

Authors:  Harald Paganetti; Chris Beltran; Stefan Both; Lei Dong; Jacob Flanz; Keith Furutani; Clemens Grassberger; David R Grosshans; Antje-Christin Knopf; Johannes A Langendijk; Hakan Nystrom; Katia Parodi; Bas W Raaymakers; Christian Richter; Gabriel O Sawakuchi; Marco Schippers; Simona F Shaitelman; B K Kevin Teo; Jan Unkelbach; Patrick Wohlfahrt; Tony Lomax
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2021-02-26       Impact factor: 4.174

9.  Patient-specific reconstruction of volumetric computed tomography images from a single projection view via deep learning.

Authors:  Liyue Shen; Wei Zhao; Lei Xing
Journal:  Nat Biomed Eng       Date:  2019-10-28       Impact factor: 25.671

10.  Feasibility evaluation of kilovoltage cone-beam computed tomography dose calculation following scatter correction: investigations of phantom and representative tumor sites.

Authors:  Huipeng Meng; Xiangjuan Meng; Qingtao Qiu; Yanlong Zhang; Xin Ming; Qifeng Li; Keqiang Wang; Ruohui Zhang; Jinghao Duan
Journal:  Transl Cancer Res       Date:  2021-08       Impact factor: 1.241

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.