Literature DB >> 31073715

Selective suppression of the vestibulo-ocular reflex during human locomotion.

Haike Dietrich1, Max Wuehr2,3.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: In lower vertebrates, gaze stabilization during locomotion is at least partially driven by a direct coupling of spinal locomotor commands with extraocular motor signals. To what extent locomotor feed-forward mechanisms contribute to gaze stabilization during human locomotion is yet unknown. In principle, the feasibility of a feed-forward regulation of gaze during locomotion should critically depend on the spatiotemporal coupling between body and head kinematics and hence the internal predictability of head movements (HMP). The present study thus investigated whether changes in eye-head coordination during human locomotion can be explained by concurrent changes in HMP.
METHODS: Eye and head movements were recorded at different locomotor speeds in light and darkness to obtain the gain and phase of the horizontal and vertical angular VOR (aVOR). Potential correlations between aVOR performance and HMP were analyzed in dependence of locomotor speed and gait cycle phase.
RESULTS: Horizontal aVOR responses persisted independent of locomotor speed. In contrast, with increasing locomotor speed vertical eye-head coordination switched from a VOR-driven compensatory mode to a synergistic behavior where head and eyes move in phase. Concurrently, vertical HMP increased with faster locomotion. Furthermore, modulations in vertical aVOR gain across the gait cycle corresponded to simultaneous alterations in vertical HMP.
CONCLUSION: The vertical aVOR appears to be suppressed during faster walking and running, whereas at the same time, the predictability of resultant head movements increases. This suggests that during stereotyped human locomotion, internal feed-forward commands supplement or even suppress sensory feedback to mediate gaze stabilization in the vertical plane.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Efference copy; Feed-forward regulation; Head motion predictability; Locomotion; Vestibulo-ocular reflex

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31073715     DOI: 10.1007/s00415-019-09352-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurol        ISSN: 0340-5354            Impact factor:   4.849


  20 in total

1.  Kalman filter detection of blinks in video-oculography: applications for VVOR measurement during locomotion.

Authors:  C A McGibbon; T Palmer; D Goldvasser; D E Krebs
Journal:  J Neurosci Methods       Date:  2001-04-30       Impact factor: 2.390

2.  Dissociating self-generated from passively applied head motion: neural mechanisms in the vestibular nuclei.

Authors:  Jefferson E Roy; Kathleen E Cullen
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2004-03-03       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 3.  Vestibular system: the many facets of a multimodal sense.

Authors:  Dora E Angelaki; Kathleen E Cullen
Journal:  Annu Rev Neurosci       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 12.449

4.  Humans integrate visual and haptic information in a statistically optimal fashion.

Authors:  Marc O Ernst; Martin S Banks
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2002-01-24       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 5.  Predictability of visual perturbation during locomotion: implications for corrective efference copy signaling.

Authors:  Boris P Chagnaud; John Simmers; Hans Straka
Journal:  Biol Cybern       Date:  2012-11-20       Impact factor: 2.086

6.  Gaze stabilization by efference copy signaling without sensory feedback during vertebrate locomotion.

Authors:  François M Lambert; Denis Combes; John Simmers; Hans Straka
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2012-07-26       Impact factor: 10.834

7.  Both actual and imagined locomotion suppress spontaneous vestibular nystagmus.

Authors:  Klaus Jahn; Michael Strupp; Thomas Brandt
Journal:  Neuroreport       Date:  2002-11-15       Impact factor: 1.837

8.  You are better off running than walking with acute vestibulopathy.

Authors:  T Brandt; M Strupp; J Benson
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1999-08-28       Impact factor: 79.321

9.  Differential effects of absent visual feedback control on gait variability during different locomotion speeds.

Authors:  M Wuehr; R Schniepp; C Pradhan; J Ilmberger; M Strupp; T Brandt; K Jahn
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2012-10-30       Impact factor: 1.972

10.  Supraspinal locomotor control in quadrupeds and humans.

Authors:  Klaus Jahn; Angela Deutschländer; Thomas Stephan; Roger Kalla; Katharina Hüfner; Judith Wagner; Michael Strupp; Thomas Brandt
Journal:  Prog Brain Res       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 2.453

View more
  6 in total

1.  Inflight head stabilization associated with wingbeat cycle and sonar emissions in the lingual echolocating Egyptian fruit bat, Rousettus aegyptiacus.

Authors:  Jackson Rossborough; Angeles Salles; Laura Stidsholt; Peter T Madsen; Cynthia F Moss; Larry F Hoffman
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2021-10-30       Impact factor: 1.836

2.  Locomotion-induced ocular motor behavior in larval Xenopus is developmentally tuned by visuo-vestibular reflexes.

Authors:  Julien Bacqué-Cazenave; Gilles Courtand; Mathieu Beraneck; Hans Straka; Denis Combes; François M Lambert
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2022-05-26       Impact factor: 17.694

Review 3.  Relative Contribution of Proprioceptive and Vestibular Sensory Systems to Locomotion: Opportunities for Discovery in the Age of Molecular Science.

Authors:  Turgay Akay; Andrew J Murray
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2021-02-02       Impact factor: 5.923

4.  Head motion predictability explains activity-dependent suppression of vestibular balance control.

Authors:  H Dietrich; F Heidger; R Schniepp; P R MacNeilage; S Glasauer; M Wuehr
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-01-20       Impact factor: 4.379

5.  Bilateral vestibulopathy and age: experimental considerations for testing dynamic visual acuity on a treadmill.

Authors:  D Starkov; M Snelders; F Lucieer; A M L Janssen; M Pleshkov; H Kingma; V van Rompaey; N Herssens; A Hallemans; L Vereeck; C McCrum; K Meijer; N Guinand; A Perez-Fornos; R van de Berg
Journal:  J Neurol       Date:  2020-10-28       Impact factor: 4.849

Review 6.  Differences in the Structure and Function of the Vestibular Efferent System Among Vertebrates.

Authors:  Kathleen E Cullen; Rui-Han Wei
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2021-06-23       Impact factor: 4.677

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.