Literature DB >> 23179256

Predictability of visual perturbation during locomotion: implications for corrective efference copy signaling.

Boris P Chagnaud1, John Simmers, Hans Straka.   

Abstract

In guiding adaptive behavior, efference copy signals or corollary discharge are traditionally considered to serve as predictors of self-generated sensory inputs and by interfering with their central processing are able to counter unwanted consequences of an animal's own actions. Here, in a speculative reflection on this issue, we consider a different functional role for such intrinsic predictive signaling, namely in stabilizing gaze during locomotion where resultant changes in head orientation in space require online compensatory eye movements in order to prevent retinal image slip. The direct activation of extraocular motoneurons by locomotor-related efference copies offers a prospective substrate for assisting self-motion derived sensory feedback, rather than being subtracted from the sensory signal to eliminate unwanted reafferent information. However, implementing such a feed-forward mechanism would be critically dependent on an appropriate phase coupling between rhythmic propulsive movement and resultant head/visual image displacement. We used video analyzes of actual locomotor behavior and basic theoretical modeling to evaluate head motion during stable locomotion in animals as diverse as Xenopus laevis tadpoles, teleost fish and horses in order to assess the potential suitability of spinal efference copies to the stabilization of gaze during locomotion. In all three species, and therefore regardless of aquatic or terrestrial environment, the head displacements that accompanied locomotor action displayed a strong correlative spatio-temporal relationship in correspondence with a potential predictive value for compensatory eye adjustments. Although spinal central pattern generator-derived efference copies offer appropriately timed commands for extraocular motor control during self-generated motion, it is likely that precise image stabilization requires the additional contributions of sensory feedback signals. Nonetheless, the predictability of the visual consequences of stereotyped locomotion renders intrinsic efference copy signaling an appealing mechanism for offsetting these disturbances, thus questioning the exclusive role traditionally ascribed to sensory-motor transformations in stabilizing gaze during vertebrate locomotion.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23179256     DOI: 10.1007/s00422-012-0528-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biol Cybern        ISSN: 0340-1200            Impact factor:   2.086


  8 in total

1.  Selective suppression of the vestibulo-ocular reflex during human locomotion.

Authors:  Haike Dietrich; Max Wuehr
Journal:  J Neurol       Date:  2019-05-09       Impact factor: 4.849

Review 2.  Moving or being moved: that makes a difference.

Authors:  Hans Straka; Boris P Chagnaud
Journal:  J Neurol       Date:  2017-03-07       Impact factor: 4.849

Review 3.  Evolution of vertebrate mechanosensory hair cells and inner ears: toward identifying stimuli that select mutation driven altered morphologies.

Authors:  Bernd Fritzsch; Hans Straka
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2013-11-27       Impact factor: 1.836

Review 4.  Ontogenetic Development of Vestibulo-Ocular Reflexes in Amphibians.

Authors:  Francisco Branoner; Boris P Chagnaud; Hans Straka
Journal:  Front Neural Circuits       Date:  2016-11-08       Impact factor: 3.492

5.  Quantification of Head Movement Predictability and Implications for Suppression of Vestibular Input during Locomotion.

Authors:  Paul R MacNeilage; Stefan Glasauer
Journal:  Front Comput Neurosci       Date:  2017-06-07       Impact factor: 2.380

Review 6.  Efference copy in kinesthetic perception: a copy of what is it?

Authors:  Mark L Latash
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2021-02-10       Impact factor: 2.714

7.  Spinal corollary discharge modulates motion sensing during vertebrate locomotion.

Authors:  Boris P Chagnaud; Roberto Banchi; John Simmers; Hans Straka
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2015-09-04       Impact factor: 14.919

8.  Head motion predictability explains activity-dependent suppression of vestibular balance control.

Authors:  H Dietrich; F Heidger; R Schniepp; P R MacNeilage; S Glasauer; M Wuehr
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-01-20       Impact factor: 4.379

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.