Literature DB >> 22840517

Gaze stabilization by efference copy signaling without sensory feedback during vertebrate locomotion.

François M Lambert1, Denis Combes, John Simmers, Hans Straka.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Self-generated body movements require compensatory eye and head adjustments in order to avoid perturbation of visual information processing. Retinal image stabilization is traditionally ascribed to the transformation of visuovestibular signals into appropriate extraocular motor commands for compensatory ocular movements. During locomotion, however, intrinsic "efference copies" of the motor commands deriving from spinal central pattern generator (CPG) activity potentially offer a reliable and rapid mechanism for image stabilization, in addition to the slower contribution of movement-encoding sensory inputs.
RESULTS: Using a variety of in vitro and in vivo preparations of Xenopus tadpoles, we demonstrate that spinal locomotor CPG-derived efference copies do indeed produce effective conjugate eye movements that counteract oppositely directed horizontal head displacements during undulatory tail-based locomotion. The efference copy transmission, by which the extraocular motor system becomes functionally appropriated to the spinal cord, is mediated by direct ascending pathways. Although the impact of the CPG feedforward commands matches the spatiotemporal specificity of classical vestibulo-ocular responses, the two fundamentally different signals do not contribute collectively to image stabilization during swimming. Instead, when the CPG is active, horizontal vestibulo-ocular reflexes resulting from head movements are selectively suppressed.
CONCLUSIONS: These results therefore challenge our traditional understanding of how animals offset the disruptive effects of propulsive body movements on visual processing. Specifically, our finding that predictive efference copies of intrinsic, rhythmic neural signals produced by the locomotory CPG supersede, rather than supplement, reactive vestibulo-ocular reflexes in order to drive image-stabilizing eye adjustments during larval frog swimming, represents a hitherto unreported mechanism for vertebrate ocular motor control.
Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22840517     DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2012.07.019

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Biol        ISSN: 0960-9822            Impact factor:   10.834


  28 in total

1.  Motor system: Tadpoles keep their eyes on the prize.

Authors:  Rachel Jones
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2012-08-16       Impact factor: 34.870

2.  Selective suppression of the vestibulo-ocular reflex during human locomotion.

Authors:  Haike Dietrich; Max Wuehr
Journal:  J Neurol       Date:  2019-05-09       Impact factor: 4.849

Review 3.  Moving or being moved: that makes a difference.

Authors:  Hans Straka; Boris P Chagnaud
Journal:  J Neurol       Date:  2017-03-07       Impact factor: 4.849

4.  Gaze holding after anterior-inferior temporal lobectomy.

Authors:  Aasef G Shaikh; Fatema F Ghasia
Journal:  Neurol Sci       Date:  2014-05-22       Impact factor: 3.307

5.  A causative link between inner ear defects and long-term striatal dysfunction.

Authors:  Michelle W Antoine; Christian A Hübner; Joseph C Arezzo; Jean M Hébert
Journal:  Science       Date:  2013-09-06       Impact factor: 47.728

6.  Functional Organization of Vestibulo-Ocular Responses in Abducens Motoneurons.

Authors:  Haike Dietrich; Stefan Glasauer; Hans Straka
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2017-03-14       Impact factor: 6.167

7.  Inflight head stabilization associated with wingbeat cycle and sonar emissions in the lingual echolocating Egyptian fruit bat, Rousettus aegyptiacus.

Authors:  Jackson Rossborough; Angeles Salles; Laura Stidsholt; Peter T Madsen; Cynthia F Moss; Larry F Hoffman
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2021-10-30       Impact factor: 1.836

Review 8.  Evolution of vertebrate mechanosensory hair cells and inner ears: toward identifying stimuli that select mutation driven altered morphologies.

Authors:  Bernd Fritzsch; Hans Straka
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2013-11-27       Impact factor: 1.836

9.  Gaze shifts and fixations dominate gaze behavior of walking cats.

Authors:  T J Rivers; M G Sirota; A I Guttentag; D A Ogorodnikov; N A Shah; I N Beloozerova
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  2014-06-26       Impact factor: 3.590

10.  Gaze coordination with strides during walking in the cat.

Authors:  Humza N Zubair; Kevin M I Chu; Justin L Johnson; Trevor J Rivers; Irina N Beloozerova
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2019-10-06       Impact factor: 6.228

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.