| Literature DB >> 31073319 |
Maria Fernanda Fernandes1, Jessica Leiras Mota Conegundes1, Nícolas de Castro Campos Pinto1, Luiz Gustavo de Oliveira2, Jair Adriano Kopke de Aguiar2, Elaine Maria Souza-Fagundes3, Elita Scio1.
Abstract
Several biological activities have been reported for leaf extracts of Cecropia pachystachya species, including antioxidant and wound healing activities. This study aims to report, for the first time, the antiaging potential of the hydroethanolic (HE) and the ethanolic (EE) extracts obtained from the leaves of C. pachystachya using different in vitro assays. Both HE and EE presented relevant antioxidant capacity in different models, including phosphomolybdenum, 1,1-diphenyl-2-picryl-hydrazyl (DPPH), carotene/linoleic acid bleaching, and thiobarbituric acid reactive substances (TBARS) assays. Their ability to prevent the production of advanced glycation end products (AGEs) was also evaluated, and both extracts showed important activity, especially HE. The extracts also stimulated the fibroblasts proliferation in vitro, specialized cells that produce several mediators which maintain the skin integrity and youthfulness. Cytotoxicity of the extracts was not observed for this lineage or HEK-293, human embryonic kidney cells widely used to evaluate cytotoxicity of chemical compounds. HE also exhibited the ability to inhibit the collagenase (metalloproteinase MMP-2) and elastase activities. The total phenolic and flavonoids contents were also determined. HPLC analysis revealed the presence of the flavonoids orientin and iso-orientin, which were quantified to be used as chemical markers. The results suggested that the extracts of C. pachystachya leaves present the potential to be used in dermocosmetic formulations to prevent the skin aging process, which attracts the attention of pharmaceutical companies and researchers interested in the development of novel ingredients likely to be used as active principles in antiaging products.Entities:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31073319 PMCID: PMC6470440 DOI: 10.1155/2019/8263934
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Evid Based Complement Alternat Med ISSN: 1741-427X Impact factor: 2.629
Gradient elution used as the mobile phase for HPLC analysis.
| Elution time (min) | Solvent | Flow rate | |
| Methanol | Water | ||
|
| |||
| 0 | 5% | 95% | |
| 5 | 33% | 67% | 0.8 mL/min |
| 30 | 37% | 63% | |
Yield and phenolic and flavonoids contents of the ethanolic (EE) and hydroethanolic (HE) extracts from Cecropia pachystachya leaves.
| Extract | Yield | Phenolics | Flavonoids |
| (%)a | ( | ( | |
|
| |||
| EE | 10.37% | 962.90 ±19.14 | 18.73± 0.12 |
| HE | 14.08% | 656.16 ± 22.03 | 72.71± 0.92 |
aData expressed as g of dry extract per 100 g of dried plant material.
bTotal phenolic content was expressed as tannic acid equivalents (μg of tannic acid per mg of dried extract).
cTotal flavonoids content was expressed as quercetin equivalents (μg quercetin equivalent/mg of extract powder).
Amounts of orientin and iso-orientin in EE and HE.
| Extract | Orientina | Iso-orientinb |
| (mg/g) | (mg/g) | |
|
| ||
| EE | 23.5 ± 0.5 | 31.8 ± 0.9 |
| HE | 35.5 ± 1.1 | 64.3 ± 1.6 |
aLine equation: y = 3611.2x – 47.859. R2 = 0.9946.
bLine equation: y = 2001.4x – 0.7367. R2 = 0.9997.
Antioxidant activity of EE and HE by phosphomolybdenum, DPPH, β carotene/linoleic acid bleaching, and TBARs assays.
| Sample | TAC | DPPH |
| MDA (%inhibition) |
| (EAA) | (IC50) | |||
|
| ||||
| EE | 0.49 ± 0,07 | a1.07 ± 0.05 | a50.82± 0.65 | a62.65±0.38 |
| HE | 0.53± 0,08 | a1.07 ± 0.06 | b65.18±5.82 | b56.08±0.51 |
| AA | - | b0.28 ± 0.05 | - | - |
| Q | - | - | b71.28±3.42 | - |
| BHT | - | - | - | c76.80±0.67 |
Values expressed as mean ± standard error (n = 3). Means with equal letters in the same column are statistically the same (p<0.05). AA: ascorbic acid; EE: ethanolic extract; EAA: equivalent to ascorbic acid; HE: hydroethanolic extract; MDA: malonaldehyde; TAC: total antioxidant capacity.
Effect of EE and HE on BSA glycation at five different concentrations.
| Extract or reference standard | Glycation Inhibition of BSA (%) |
| (12.5 | |
|
| |
| EE | a33.10% ± 0.17 |
| HE | b51.30% ± 1.21 |
| Quercetin | c8.01 % ± 1.26 |
| Aminoguanidine | d23.79 % ± 2.68 |
Values are expressed as mean ± standard error of the mean (n = 3). Means with different letters in the same column shows statistical differences (p<0.001). BSA: bovine serum albumin; EE: ethanolic extract; HE: hydroethanolic extract.
Figure 1Percentage of BALBC/3T3 fibroblasts proliferation at different concentrations (16.15 to 300 μg/mL) of EE (ethanolic extract) and HE (hydroethanolic extract) after a period of 24 h.
Figure 2Inhibitory effects of hydroethanolic leaf extract (HE) on MMP-2 activity. A representative zymogram of MMP-2 activity obtained from RAW 264.7 is also shown. Electrophoresis in polyacrylamide gel at 7.5%, containing gelatin was performed. The metalloproteinase MMP-2 activities were quantified by bands densitometry and compared to the control [14]. Values expressed as mean ± standard error of the mean (n = 3). ∗ Statistically different from NC (p<0.05); ∗∗ statistically different from NC (p<0.01). NC: negative control (DMSO 0.05%).
Figure 3Inhibitory effects of hydroethanolic leaf extract (HE) on elastase activity. Gelatin zymography of MMP-2 was incubated for 24 h in the absence and presence of HE at different concentrations. Values expressed as mean ± standard error of the mean (n = 3). Equal letters represent no statistical difference (p < 0.05).