| Literature DB >> 31073308 |
Andre Luiz Ferreira Costa1, Aline Kataki Paixão2, Bianca Costa Gonçalves2, Celso Massahiro Ogawa1, Thiago Martinelli3, Fernando Akio Maeda3, Tarcila Trivino3, Sérgio Lucio Pereira de Castro Lopes2.
Abstract
This study aimed to investigate the olfactory fossa according to the Keros classification using cone beam computed tomography. This cross-sectional study analysed cone beam computed tomography images selected from a database belonging to a radiology centre. The scans of 174 healthy patients were analysed by using the Xoran software. Gender, age, and side were correlated with the Keros classification. The mean age of the 174 patients was 45.3 years. The most prevalent Keros classification was type II (65.52%), followed by type III (20.69%) and type I (13.79%). No significant differences were found between Keros classification and the variables age, right side (p value = 0.4620), and left side (p value = 0.5709). There were also no significant differences between gender and the variables right side (p value = 0.1421) and left side (p value = 0.2136). Based on these results, we suggest that cone beam computed tomography can be recommended for analysis of the anterior skull base. Keros type II was the most prevalent type in our sample.Entities:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31073308 PMCID: PMC6470455 DOI: 10.1155/2019/4134260
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Dent ISSN: 1687-8728
Figure 1Coronal plane CBCT image and diagram with the marked ethmoidal region showing different anatomical structures.
Figure 2Diagram and images of measurement of the three types of olfactory fossa, according to Keros classification: (a) type I; (b) type II; (c) type III.
Figure 3Scatter plot of the two measurements (right side).
Figure 4Scatter plot of the two measurements (left side).
The distribution of Keros classification and the measures according to sides.
| Right | Left | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| I | II | III | Total | |
| I |
| 10 | 0 | |
|
| 5.75 | 0.00 | 24 | |
|
| 41.67 | 0.00 | 13.79 | |
|
| 9.17 | 0.00 | ||
|
| ||||
| II | 7 |
| 27 | |
| 4.02 |
| 15.52 | 114 | |
| 6.14 |
| 23.68 | 65.52 | |
| 31.82 |
| 62.79 | ||
|
| ||||
| III | 1 | 19 |
| |
| 0.57 | 10.92 |
| 36 | |
| 2.78 | 52.78 |
| 20.69 | |
| 4.55 | 17.43 |
| ||
|
| ||||
| Total | 22 | 109 | 43 | 174 |
| 12.64 | 62.64 | 24.71 | 100.00 | |
1Percentage of the total subjects (174 subjects); 2percentage of the row (sum 100% on the row); 3percentage of the column (sum 100% on the column).
Measures of position and dispersion of age by the Keros classification (ANOVA).
| Side | Keros |
| Mean values | SD |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Right | I | 24 | 47.75 | 11.80 | 0.4620 |
| II | 114 | 45.37 | 12.11 | ||
| III | 36 | 43.61 | 14.61 | ||
|
| |||||
| Left | I | 22 | 44.86 | 14.39 | 0.5709 |
| II | 109 | 46.07 | 12.91 | ||
| III | 43 | 43.70 | 10.85 | ||
N: number; SD: standard deviation; p value significant at 5%.
Distribution of the Keros classification according to gender.
| Side | Gender | Keros I | Keros II | Keros III |
| |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| % |
| % |
| % | |||
| Right | F | 23 | 95.83 | 90 | 78.95 | 30 | 83.33 | 0.1421 |
| M | 1 | 4.17 | 24 | 21.05 | 6 | 16.67 | ||
|
| ||||||||
| Left | F | 21 | 95.45 | 88 | 80.73 | 34 | 79.07 | 0.2136 |
| M | 1 | 4.55 | 21 | 19.27 | 9 | 20.93 | ||
N: number; F: female; M: male; p value significant at 5%.
GEE results to assess the influence of gender and age on the Keros classification.
| Gender | Age | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Variable |
| Variable |
|
| Gender | 0.1300 | Age | 0.2367 |
| Side | 0.1931 | Side | 0.8465 |
| Side ∗ gender | 0.6190 | Age ∗ side | 0.6344 |