Jennifer S Brach1, Gustavo J Almeida1, Subashan Perera2,3, Andrea Hergenroeder1, Mary Kotlarczyk2, Bethany Barone Gibbs4. 1. Department of Physical Therapy, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA. 2. Division of Geriatric Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA. 3. Department of Biostatistics, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA. 4. Department of Health and Physical Activity, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: To compare amounts of sedentary behavior and physical activity in adults residing in planned group residential settings to those residing in private homes. METHODS: Thirty-one older adults who resided in planned group residential settings (n=13) and in private homes (n=18) participated. Daily activities were measured using the Sensewear Armband for 7 days. Estimates of the duration of daily activities performed across sedentary, light, and moderate-to-vigorous intensities were captured. RESULTS: Participants in planned group residential settings were older (age 85.9±3.5 vs 78.3±7.2; p=0.001) and spent more time in sedentary behaviors (12.7±1.5 vs 11.3±1.6; p=0.02) than participants in private homes. The difference was attenuated slightly after controlling for age and wear time (adjusted difference 1.2±0.6 hours, p=0.06). DISCUSSION: Adults residing in planned group residential settings, which provide supportive services, were more sedentary than adults residing in private homes. The environment in which older adults live may contribute to sedentary behavior.
OBJECTIVES: To compare amounts of sedentary behavior and physical activity in adults residing in planned group residential settings to those residing in private homes. METHODS: Thirty-one older adults who resided in planned group residential settings (n=13) and in private homes (n=18) participated. Daily activities were measured using the Sensewear Armband for 7 days. Estimates of the duration of daily activities performed across sedentary, light, and moderate-to-vigorous intensities were captured. RESULTS: Participants in planned group residential settings were older (age 85.9±3.5 vs 78.3±7.2; p=0.001) and spent more time in sedentary behaviors (12.7±1.5 vs 11.3±1.6; p=0.02) than participants in private homes. The difference was attenuated slightly after controlling for age and wear time (adjusted difference 1.2±0.6 hours, p=0.06). DISCUSSION: Adults residing in planned group residential settings, which provide supportive services, were more sedentary than adults residing in private homes. The environment in which older adults live may contribute to sedentary behavior.
Entities:
Keywords:
environment; planned group residential settings; sedentary
Authors: James F Sallis; Robert B Cervero; William Ascher; Karla A Henderson; M Katherine Kraft; Jacqueline Kerr Journal: Annu Rev Public Health Date: 2006 Impact factor: 21.981
Authors: Charles E Matthews; Kong Y Chen; Patty S Freedson; Maciej S Buchowski; Bettina M Beech; Russell R Pate; Richard P Troiano Journal: Am J Epidemiol Date: 2008-02-25 Impact factor: 4.897
Authors: E G Wilmot; C L Edwardson; F A Achana; M J Davies; T Gorely; L J Gray; K Khunti; T Yates; S J H Biddle Journal: Diabetologia Date: 2012-08-14 Impact factor: 10.122
Authors: Lisa H Colbert; Charles E Matthews; Thomas C Havighurst; Kyungmann Kim; Dale A Schoeller Journal: Med Sci Sports Exerc Date: 2011-05 Impact factor: 5.411
Authors: Keith P Gennuso; Ronald E Gangnon; Charles E Matthews; Keith M Thraen-Borowski; Lisa H Colbert Journal: Med Sci Sports Exerc Date: 2013-08 Impact factor: 5.411
Authors: Richard P Troiano; David Berrigan; Kevin W Dodd; Louise C Mâsse; Timothy Tilert; Margaret McDowell Journal: Med Sci Sports Exerc Date: 2008-01 Impact factor: 5.411
Authors: Mary P Kotlarczyk; Andrea L Hergenroeder; Bethany Barone Gibbs; Flor de Abril Cameron; Megan E Hamm; Jennifer S Brach Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2020-09-03 Impact factor: 3.390