OBJECTIVE: To examine the test-retest reliability and concurrent validity of variability of gait characteristics. DESIGN: Cross-sectional study. SETTING: Research laboratory. PARTICIPANTS: Older adults (N=558) from the Cardiovascular Health Study. INTERVENTIONS: Not applicable. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Gait characteristics were measured using a 4-m computerized walkway. SD determined from the steps recorded were used as the measures of variability. Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) were calculated to examine test-retest reliability of a 4-m walk and two 4-m walks. To establish concurrent validity, the measures of gait variability were compared across levels of health, functional status, and physical activity using independent t tests and analysis of variances. RESULTS: Gait variability measures from the two 4-m walks demonstrated greater test-retest reliability than those from the single 4-m walk (ICC=.22-.48 and ICC=.40-.63, respectively). Greater step length and stance time variability were associated with poorer health, functional status and physical activity (P<.05). CONCLUSIONS: Gait variability calculated from a limited number of steps has fair to good test-retest reliability and concurrent validity. Reliability of gait variability calculated from a greater number of steps should be assessed to determine if the consistency can be improved.
OBJECTIVE: To examine the test-retest reliability and concurrent validity of variability of gait characteristics. DESIGN: Cross-sectional study. SETTING: Research laboratory. PARTICIPANTS: Older adults (N=558) from the Cardiovascular Health Study. INTERVENTIONS: Not applicable. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Gait characteristics were measured using a 4-m computerized walkway. SD determined from the steps recorded were used as the measures of variability. Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) were calculated to examine test-retest reliability of a 4-m walk and two 4-m walks. To establish concurrent validity, the measures of gait variability were compared across levels of health, functional status, and physical activity using independent t tests and analysis of variances. RESULTS: Gait variability measures from the two 4-m walks demonstrated greater test-retest reliability than those from the single 4-m walk (ICC=.22-.48 and ICC=.40-.63, respectively). Greater step length and stance time variability were associated with poorer health, functional status and physical activity (P<.05). CONCLUSIONS: Gait variability calculated from a limited number of steps has fair to good test-retest reliability and concurrent validity. Reliability of gait variability calculated from a greater number of steps should be assessed to determine if the consistency can be improved.
Authors: Jennifer S Brach; Jaime E Berlin; Jessie M VanSwearingen; Anne B Newman; Stephanie A Studenski Journal: J Neuroeng Rehabil Date: 2005-07-26 Impact factor: 4.262
Authors: Jennifer S Brach; David Wert; Jessie M VanSwearingen; Anne B Newman; Stephanie A Studenski Journal: J Geriatr Phys Ther Date: 2012 Jul-Sep Impact factor: 3.381
Authors: Jennifer S Brach; Jessie M Van Swearingen; Subashan Perera; David M Wert; Stephanie Studenski Journal: J Am Geriatr Soc Date: 2013-10-28 Impact factor: 5.562
Authors: Jennifer S Brach; Subashan Perera; Sandra Gilmore; Jessie M VanSwearingen; Deborah Brodine; David Wert; Neelesh K Nadkarni; Edmund Ricci Journal: Contemp Clin Trials Date: 2016-08-10 Impact factor: 2.226