| Literature DB >> 31069117 |
Roberta Piovesana1,2, Alessandro Faroni2, Valerio Magnaghi3, Adam J Reid2,4, Ada Maria Tata1,5.
Abstract
Schwann cells (SCs) play a central role in peripheral nervous system physiology and in the response to axon injury. The ability of SCs to proliferate, secrete growth factors, modulate immune response, migrate and re-myelinate regenerating axons has been largely documented. However, there are several restrictions hindering their clinical application, such as the difficulty in collection and a slow in vitro expansion. Adipose-derived stem cells (ASCs) present good properties for peripheral nerve regenerative medicine. When exposed to specific growth factors in vitro, they can acquire a SC-like phenotype (dASCs) expressing key SCs markers and assuming spindle-shaped morphology. Nevertheless, the differentiated phenotype is unstable and several strategies, including pharmacological stimulation, are being studied to improve differentiation outcomes. Cholinergic receptors are potential pharmacological targets expressed in glial cells. Our previous work demonstrated that muscarinic cholinergic receptors, in particular M2 subtype, are present in SCs and are able to modulate several physiological processes. In the present work, muscarinic receptors expression was characterised and the effects mediated by M2 muscarinic receptor were evaluated in rat dASCs. M2 receptor activation, by the preferred agonist arecaidine propargyl ester (APE), caused a reversible arrest of dASCs cell growth, supported by the downregulation of proteins involved in the maintenance of cell proliferation and upregulation of proteins involved in the differentiation (i.e., c-Jun and Egr-2), without affecting cell survival. Moreover, M2 receptor activation in dASCs enhances a pronounced spindle-shaped morphology, supported by Egr2 upregulation, and inhibits cell migration. Our data clearly demonstrate that rat dASCs express functional muscarinic receptors, in particular M2 subtype, which is able to modulate their physiological and morphological processes, as well as SCs differentiation. These novel findings could open new opportunities for the development of combined cell and pharmacological therapies for peripheral nerve regeneration, harnessing the potential of dASCs and M2 receptors.Entities:
Keywords: Peripheral nervous system; Stem-cell research
Year: 2019 PMID: 31069117 PMCID: PMC6499790 DOI: 10.1038/s41420-019-0174-6
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Cell Death Discov ISSN: 2058-7716
Fig. 1Stem cell and glial markers expression.
a Stem cell markers expression was assessed by RT-PCR. ASCs were used as positive control for stem cell markers expression. After growth factors exposure, stemness markers, CD90, CD44 and CD29 were significantly downregulated in dASCs (***p < 0.001). Data are represented as mean ± SEM of three independent experiments. b Glial markers expression was evaluated by RT-PCR. ASCs were used as negative control, while nerve-derived SCs were used as positive control. After 18 days of differentiation, glial markers were upregulated in dASCs (i.e., Sox10, S100β, GFAP and P0). c Analysis in contrast phase microscopy showed that dASCs changed their morphology compared to ASCs, featuring the classical spindle-shaped morphology similar to SCs (scale bar: 200 µm). d Expression of S100β and GFAP in dASCs was analysed by immunocytochemistry (scale bar: 100 µm)
Fig. 2Muscarinic receptor subtypes expression.
a dASCs, as well as undifferentiated ASCs express all muscarinic receptors transcripts, except M5. GAPDH was used as housekeeping gene and brain lysates were used as positive controls. b Western blot showed M2 muscarinic receptor expression in ASCs and dASCs. β-actin was used as protein reference. c Densitometric analysis did not show any particular variation of M2 protein levels after SCs phenotype induction. Data are represented as mean ± SEM of three independent experiments and normalised against ASCs as control group. d Levels of cyclic AMP (cAMP) in dASCs. cAMP levels decreased after 2 h of treatment with APE 100 µM compared to untreated controls (**p < 0.01)
Fig. 3Cell growth was affected by M2 subtype selective activation.
a Cell growth was analysed by MTS assay. M2 agonist treatment, APE 100 μM, was maintained from 3 to 7 days. M2 activation caused a decreased of cell growth (***p < 0.001). Cell growth was also evaluated in cultures maintained in the presence of APE 100 μM plus M2 antagonist (10−7 M Methoctramine; Meth), which was able to counteract APE effect. b, c The decreased cell growth was accompanied by a downregulated expression of cyclin D1 and PCNA transcripts (24 h of APE 100 μM treatment)(*p < 0.05). d Recovery of proliferative capability was assessed after 72 h of APE treatment (100 μM). APE was removed and the cell growth was analysed until 120 h by MTS assay. dASCs were able to recover cell proliferation after APE withdrawal. The results are the mean ± SEM of three independent experiments performed in triplicate (**p < 0.01 and ***p < 0.001). e, f The analysis of cell viability was performed after 48 h of APE treatment. There was no significant increase in the percentage of dead cells after APE treatment. Images were taken at 4x magnification (scale bar: 200 µm) and the dead cells are highlighted with yellow arrows. (***p < 0.001). Data are represented as mean ± SEM of three independent experiments
Fig. 4Morphological changes following M2 receptor selective activation.
a Following APE treatment (24, 48 and 72 h of treatment) dASCs appeared at lower density compared to untreated cells and presented a more elongated, spindle-shaped morphology (scale bar: 200 µm). Representation of the measured lengths is highlighted by the yellow lines. b dASCs treated with APE 100 µM exhibit more spindle-like shape with an increase of aspect ratio when compared to untreated cells (***p < 0.001). c To confirm that modified cell morphology was the result of M2 selective activation, the same experiment was performed in presence of 10−7 M of M2 antagonist Methoctramine plus APE 100 µM. M2 antagonist was able to counteract APE effect. Aspect ratio in presence of antagonist was comparable to the untreated cells (***p < 0.001). Data are represented as mean ± SEM of three independent experiments. d APE treatment upregulated P0 transcripts expression (**p < 0.01)
Fig. 5M2 receptor activation was able to regulate dASCs proliferation and differentiation markers.
a, b Analysis by qRT-PCR demonstrated that APE 100 µM negatively downregulated c-jun and notch-1 transcripts (*p < 0.05, **p < 0.01 and ***p < 0.001). c APE 100 µM induced an upregulated expression of egr-2 mRNA at both 30 minutes and 1 h (***p < 0.001). d, e The transcriptional factors c-Jun and Egr-2 were also evaluated by western blot analysis. β-tubulin was used as protein reference. The expression of Egr-2 appears significantly upregulated after 4 h of treatment while c-Jun was significantly downregulated after 2 h of APE treatment (*p < 0.05). Data are represented as mean ± SEM of three independent experiments
Fig. 6Neuregulins (NRG) and their receptors were regulated by M2 muscarinic receptors.
a Analysis by RT-PCR indicated that APE 100 µM was able to downregulate NRG1-1 and upregulate NRG1-3 isoform transcripts. Moreover, M2 agonist treatment caused also an increase of erbB2 NRG receptor expression while any particular variation of erbB3 expression was observed. b The graphs show the densitometric analysis of the band normalised for the housekeeping gene GAPDH. The results are the mean ± SEM obtained from three independent experiments (*p < 0.05, **p < 0.01 and ***p < 0.001)
Fig. 7dASCs migration was reduced following M2 receptor stimulation.
a Wound healing experiments were set up to study cell migration. The images were obtained at time 0 and after 6 h from scratch. Upper panel shows the images at phase contrast, whereas lower panels show the cells stained with fluorescent actin-specific dye (Phalloidin) at two different levels of magnification (scale bar: 200 µM). The distance of the gap between two fronts was measured at the two-time points. M2 activation was able to reduce dASCs migration (***p < 0.001). This event was likely due to M2 selective activation since following antagonization of this receptor with 10−7 M Methoctramine, cell migration was not modified, and migration was similar to untreated cells. Phalloidin staining showed that more stress fibres were present after APE treatment. b Graph showing quantitative measurements of the distance travelled (µm) (t0−t6 h). c Analysis by qRT-PCR of CXCL4/7-CXCL12 transcripts. APE (100 μM) treatment induced a downregulation of CXCL12-CXCR4/CXCR7 mRNA. These results are the mean ± SEM of three independent experiments (*p < 0.05; **p < 0.01; ***p < 0.001)
Primer sequences used in semiquantitative and quantitative RT-PCR analysis
| Gene | Forward | Reverse |
|---|---|---|
|
| 5′-CCATGGAGTCCCTCACATCCT-3′ | 5′-ATCTACCATGGGCATCTTGATCA-3’ |
|
| 5′-GCTCCAATGATTCGACGTCA-3′ | 5′-CGAAGTGGAAACTGTTGTTTTCAT-3′ |
|
| 5′-TCCATCCTCAACTCTACCAAGCT-3′ | 5′-TTGTGAGCATTTCTCTCCACATC-3′ |
|
| 5′-CACTCTGCAATGCCACTTTCAA-3′ | 5′-CTGTGCCGATGTTCCGATACT-3′ |
|
| 5′-ACCCGCACTGAAAACAGTGACT-3′ | 5′-ATCGGAACTAGGCAACACACTT-3′ |
|
| 5′-TGGGTCGCTGATTGGCTG-3′ | 5′-CTCTTCAGTGACTGCAAAAATCG-3′ |
|
| 5′-TCATGTTAGAGCATCCGTGC-3′ | 5′-GGGTTGTACATCATGCCTCC-3′ |
|
| 5′-TGAACCCAGTCATCAGCAT-3′ | 5′-CAGTCGAAGGTTCTGGTTCACC-3′ |
|
| 5′-CCCTCTGCACGCACTTGAAG-3′ | 5′-GCGAGCCATGCTTAAGACTGA-3′ |
|
| 5′-GAAGCACCAAATCAAGAGAA-3′ | 5′-TCACCCCGTCCTTTGCACAG-3′ |
|
| 5′-CTCACGCTGATGTCAATGCT-3′ | 5′-GCAACACTTTGGCAGTCTTCA-3′ |
|
| 5′-GATGGAAACGACCTTCTACGAC-3′ | 5′-AGCGTATTCTGGCTATGCAGTT-3′ |
|
| 5′-ACTGGGAACAGCCAGTATATA-3' | 5′-ACCAAACTCCTCCTTTGCCA-3' |
|
| 5′-ATAGCACCTCCGTTGGACAG-3' | 5′-TCGTTTGCACAGAGGACAAG-3' |
|
| 5′-GCTGAACTGAACCAGCTTCGA-3' | 5′-CTTGGCCACATCCATCTCCAC-3' |
|
| 5′-TCTTTTACCTGGCGCTACCAG-3' | 5′-GTTGACCCTTGGCATAGTGGA-3' |
|
| 5′-AACGGAGTGGCCGGAGAT-3′ | 5′-ATGGGAGATCCAACGACCTCTT-3′ |
|
| 5′-TCATCTTCGGCGAGATGTCTG-3' | 5-‘CTCCTGGCTTTCATTTCTTTCA-3' |
|
| 5′-GGACCCCTGAGGTGAGAGAACA-3' | 5′-CAGTCGTGGATGTCGATGTGG-3' |
|
| 5′-CGAGTGTCAGCCTCAAAACA-3' | 5′-CTCATCCGGGTACTTCCAGA-3' |
|
| 5′-CTGTTTAGGCCAAGCAGAGG-3' | 5′-GACTTTGTTTGCCTTCTCGC-3' |
|
| 5′-GCCATGGCTGACTGGTACTT-3′ | 5′-GATGAAGGCCAGGATGAGAA-3′ |
|
| 5′-GGCTACGACACACACTGCTA-3′ | 5′-GGTCCACGCTCATGCATGCG-3′ |
|
| 5′-TGCATCAGTGACGGTAAGCCA-3′ | 5′-ATCCACTTTAATTTCGGGTCAA-3′ |
|
|