| Literature DB >> 31069006 |
Keita Kojima1, Naoko Minatani1, Hideki Ushiku1, Satoru Ishii1, Toshimichi Tanaka1, Keigo Yokoi1, Nobuyuki Nishizawa1, Yosuke Ooizumi1, Kazuharu Igarashi1, Kei Hosoda1, Hiromitsu Moriya1, Hiroaki Mieno1, Masahiko Watanabe1, Keishi Yamashita1,2.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Early detection of remnant gastric cancer (RGC) is required to reduce the risk of death, but long-term endoscopic surveillance is difficult after gastrectomy. In this study, data for the methylation status of 4 methylation genes (CDO1, HOPX, Reprimo, and E-cadherin) to predict the onset of RGC are presented.Entities:
Keywords: E-cadherin; Reprimo; cysteine dioxygenase 1 (CDO1); homeodomain-only protein X (HOPX); remnant gastric cancer
Year: 2019 PMID: 31069006 PMCID: PMC6497431 DOI: 10.18632/oncotarget.26814
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Oncotarget ISSN: 1949-2553
Figure 1The calculation of the cut-off value of the cancer tissue and non-cancerous mucosa in the remnant stomach
(A) Comparison between remnant gastric cancer tissue (RT) and remnant stomach non-cancerous mucosa (RN) using a t-test. (B) ROC curve for distinguishing between RT and RN. (C) The proportions of patients with TaqMeth Vs higher than the cut-off values.
Relationship with TaqMeth V of CDO1, HOPX, Reprimo and E-cadherin and clinicopathological factors at cancer tissue and non-cancerous mucosa
| Clinicopathological factors | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age (≤70 : 70<) | 29 : 29 | 0.39/0.34 | 0.31/0.14 | 0.09/0.98 | 0.66/0.99 |
| Sex (M : F) | 51 : 7 | 0.07/0.36 | 0.39/0.98 | 0.14/0.63 | 0.64/0.42 |
| Initial diagnosis (Malignancy : Benign) | 35 : 23 | 0.67/0.14 | 0.25/0.10 | 0.29/0.68 | 0.83/0.23 |
| Helicobacter pylori (+ : –) | 5 : 6 | 0.18/0.10 | 0.06/0.12 | 0.68/0.12 | 0.20/0.54 |
| Reconstruction of initial operation (BI : BII : Other) | 38 : 16 : 4 | 0.71/0.35 | 0.93/0.79 | 0.95/0.84 | 0.56/0.46 |
| Site of recurrence (Anastomotic site : Non-anastomotic site) | 30 : 28 | 0.14/0.65 | 0.87/0.14 | 0.20/0.31 | 0.12/0.15 |
| Depth of tumor invasion (∼sm : mp∼) | 29 : 29 | 0.85/0.21 | 0.56/0.51 | 0.17/0.58 | 0.75/0.59 |
| Lymph node metastasis (+ : –) | 45 : 13 | 0.35/0.30 | 0.36/0.23 | 0.26/0.38 | 0.01/0.64 |
| Distant metastasis (+ : –) | 2 : 56 | 0.32/0.70 | 0.13/0.41 | 0.55/0.61 | 0.63/0.62 |
| (y)pStage (∼II : III∼) | 46 : 12 | 0.04/0.33 | 0.37/0.35 | 0.06/0.37 | 0.21/0.71 |
| Lymphatic invasion (+ : –) | 23 : 35 | 0.43/0.20 | 0.37/0.20 | 0.20/0.37 | 0.13/0.51 |
| Venous invasion (+ : –) | 21 : 37 | 0.29/0.09 | 0.80/0.46 | 0.34/0.43 | 0.65/0.39 |
| Lauren's histology (intestinal type : diffuse type) | 29 : 29 | 0.36/0.34 | 0.29/0.01 | 0.39/0.51 | 0.19/0.22 |
| Infiltrative pattern (a : b : c) | 8 : 17 : 33 | 0.23/0.50 | 0.57/0.19 | 0.40/0.97 | 0.61/0.18 |
a: cancer tissue/non-cancerous mucosa
Figure 2Scheme of the period of sampling non-cancerous mucosa
Circle indicates the region where gastric mucosa was collected. We distinguished non-cancerous mucosa by diagnosis at initial surgery. We collected non-cancerous mucosa at the time of initial surgery and at the onset of remnant gastric cancer, respectively. We underwent endoscopic biopsy during follow-up from initial surgery.
Figure 3Variance analysis of TaqMeth V of each gene derived from remnant stomach or initial gastrectomy non-cancerous mucosa specimens whose first diagnoses were malignant or benign
RN: remnant gastric non-cancerous mucosa. IN: initially obtained specimens of non-cancerous mucosa. IM: initial diagnosis of malignant disease. IB: initial diagnosis of benign disease.
Figure 4The calculation of the propensity scores for non-cancerous mucosa
(A) (Left figure) ROC curve of the propensity score whose covariates were the TaqMeth Vs of the four genes derived from non-cancerous mucosa in remnant stomach. (Right figure) Comparison of PS between the two groups due to the difference in the initial diagnosis. (B) (Left figure) ROC curve of the propensity score whose covariates were the TaqMeth Vs of the four genes derived from non-cancerous mucosa in remnant stomach, age, sex, and time from the initial surgery. (Right figure) Comparison of propensity scores between the two groups due to the difference in the initial diagnosis.
Figure 5Predictors of the time to development of remnant gastric cancer
(A) The relationships between the period to onset and the TaqMeth Vs of 4 genes. (B) Optimum cut-off TaqMeth V, sensitivity and specificity of each gene for dividing the time to development into a short-term group and a long-term group. Comparison with period to the onset of remnant gastric cancer between the two groups, which were divided by the cut-off value. (C) Comparison of the one point or less group with the two or more points group for the period to remaining gastric cancer onset.
Evaluation in combination the scores of each gene
| Combination | Score | |
|---|---|---|
| 0, 1, 2 | 0.003 | |
| 0, 1–2 | 0.01 | |
| 0–1, 2 | 0.0009 | |
| 0, 1, 2 | 0.002 | |
| 0, 1–2 | 0.03 | |
| 0–1, 2 | 0.0004 | |
| 0, 1, 2 | 0.0004 | |
| 0, 1–2 | 0.0005 | |
| 0–1, 2 | 0.0008 | |
| 0, 1, 2, 3 | 0.003 | |
| 0, 1–3 | 0.02 | |
| 0–1, 2–3 | 0.0004 | |
| 0–2, 3 | 0.0008 | |
| 0, 1, 2, 3, 4 | 0.003 | |
| 0, 1–4 | 0.003 | |
| 0–1, 2–4 | <0.0001 | |
| 0–2, 3–4 | 0.001 | |
| 0–3, 4 | 0.43 |