Literature DB >> 3393171

Stomach cancer after partial gastrectomy for benign ulcer disease.

G Lundegårdh1, H O Adami, C Helmick, M Zack, O Meirik.   

Abstract

We followed for 25 to 33 years 6459 patients who had undergone partial gastrectomy for benign ulcer disease to determine the incidence of stomach cancer. The overall risk was no different from that among sex- and age-matched controls from the Swedish Cancer Registry (standardized incidence ratio = 0.96; 95 percent confidence limits, 0.78 and 1.16). However, when the patients were classified according to the duration of follow-up after operation, sex, surgical procedure, diagnosis at the time of operation, and age at operation, differences in risk were observed between the subgroups. After adjustment for potential confounding variables, the average adjusted risk increased 28 percent (adjusted standardized incidence ratio = 1.28; 95 percent confidence limits, 1.11 and 1.49) for each successive five-year interval after operation. The adjusted risk was greater among women than men (adjusted standardized incidence ratio = 1.96; 95 percent confidence limits, 1.18 and 3.24). Patients who had undergone a Billroth I anastomosis had a lower crude risk, both overall (standardized incidence ratio = 0.40; 95 percent confidence limits, 0.20 and 0.71) and after we controlled for other confounding variables (adjusted standardized incidence ratio = 0.27; 95 percent confidence limits, 0.12 and 0.62), than did those who had undergone a Billroth II procedure. The adjusted risk of stomach cancer was greater among patients operated on for gastric ulcer than among those operated on for duodenal ulcer (adjusted standardized incidence ratio = 2.21; 95 percent confidence limits, 1.45 and 3.35). Risk decreased with increased age at operation. Between successive strata of age at operation (less than 39, 40 to 49, 50 to 59, and greater than or equal to 60 years of age), the adjusted risk decreased on the average by about half (adjusted standardized incidence ratio = 0.52; 95 percent confidence limits, 0.41 and 0.66).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1988        PMID: 3393171     DOI: 10.1056/NEJM198807283190402

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  N Engl J Med        ISSN: 0028-4793            Impact factor:   91.245


  55 in total

1.  Duodenogastric bile reflux after gastric bypass: a cholescintigraphic study.

Authors:  Magnus Sundbom; Hans Hedenström; Sven Gustavsson
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 3.199

2.  Chromoendoscopic evaluation of gastric mucosa after partial gastrectomy by use of modified endoscopic Congo red test.

Authors:  Ervin Tóth; Kristina Sjölund; Henrik Thorlacius
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2003-05-13       Impact factor: 3.352

Review 3.  The risk of large bowel cancer after partial gastrectomy for benign ulcer disease.

Authors:  G Lundegårdh; H O Adami; C Helmick; M Zack
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1990-12       Impact factor: 12.969

Review 4.  Current management of gastric cancer.

Authors:  Ulf H Haglund; Bengt Wallner
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 3.452

5.  Gastric acid suppression and risk of oesophageal and gastric adenocarcinoma: a nested case control study in the UK.

Authors:  L A García Rodríguez; J Lagergren; M Lindblad
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2006-06-19       Impact factor: 23.059

6.  Modified hemi-double-stapling technique combined with the temporal abdominal-wall-lift method for performing Billroth I anastomosis after laparoscopically assisted distal gastrectomy.

Authors:  Hidenori Fujii; Toshiharu Aotake; Yoshiyuki Kawakami; Yukihiro Okuda; Koji Doi; Yuki Hirose; Toshio Matsushita
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2008-03-07       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 7.  Screening for gastrointestinal cancer: an epidemiological review.

Authors:  J Weil; M J Langman
Journal:  Gut       Date:  1991-02       Impact factor: 23.059

Review 8.  "Mini" gastric bypass: systematic review of a controversial procedure.

Authors:  Kamal K Mahawar; Neil Jennings; James Brown; Ajay Gupta; Shlok Balupuri; Peter K Small
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2013-11       Impact factor: 4.129

9.  Complications Following the Mini/One Anastomosis Gastric Bypass (MGB/OAGB): a Multi-institutional Survey on 2678 Patients with a Mid-term (5 Years) Follow-up.

Authors:  Mario Musella; Antonio Susa; Emilio Manno; Maurizio De Luca; Francesco Greco; Marco Raffaelli; Stefano Cristiano; Marco Milone; Paolo Bianco; Antonio Vilardi; Ivana Damiano; Gianni Segato; Laura Pedretti; Piero Giustacchini; Domenico Fico; Gastone Veroux; Luigi Piazza
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2017-11       Impact factor: 4.129

10.  Management of gastric remnant carcinoma based on the results of a 15-year endoscopic screening program.

Authors:  F L Greene
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1996-06       Impact factor: 12.969

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.