Literature DB >> 25767146

Hummingbird flight stability and control in freestream turbulent winds.

Sridhar Ravi1, James D Crall2, Lucas McNeilly2, Susan F Gagliardi2, Andrew A Biewener2, Stacey A Combes2.   

Abstract

Airflow conditions close to the Earth's surface are often complex, posing challenges to flight stability and control for volant taxa. Relatively little is known about how well flying animals can contend with complex, adverse air flows, or about the flight control mechanisms used by animals to mitigate wind disturbances. Several recent studies have examined flight in the unsteady von Kármán vortex streets that form behind cylinders, generating flow disturbances that are predictable in space and time; these structures are relatively rare in nature, because they occur only the immediate, downstream vicinity of an object. In contrast, freestream turbulence is characterized by rapid, unpredictable flow disturbances across a wide range of spatial and temporal scales, and is nearly ubiquitous in natural habitats. Hummingbirds are ideal organisms for studying the influence of freestream turbulence on flight, as they forage in a variety of aerial conditions and are powerful flyers. We filmed ruby-throated hummingbirds (Archilochus colubris) maintaining position at a feeder in laminar and strongly turbulent (intensity ∼15%) airflow environments within a wind tunnel and compared their mean kinematics of the head, body, tail and wing, as well as variability in these parameters. Hummingbirds exhibited remarkably stable head position and orientation in both smooth and turbulent flow while maintaining position at the feeder. However, the hummingbird's body was less stable in turbulent flow and appeared to be most sensitive to disturbances along the mediolateral axis, displaying large lateral accelerations, translations and rolling motions during flight. The hummingbirds mitigated these disturbances by increasing mean wing stroke amplitude and stroke plane angle, and by varying these parameters asymmetrically between the wings and from one stroke to the next. They also actively varied the orientation and fan angle of the tail, maintaining a larger mean fan angle when flying in turbulent flow; this may improve their passive stability, but probably incurs an energetic cost as a result of increased drag. Overall, we observed many of the same kinematic changes noted previously for hummingbirds flying in a von Kármán vortex street, but we also observed kinematic changes associated with high force production, similar to those seen during load-lifting or high-speed flight. These findings suggest that flight may be particularly costly in fully mixed, freestream turbulence, which is the flow condition that hummingbirds are likely to encounter most frequently in natural habitats.
© 2015. Published by The Company of Biologists Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Archilochus colubris; Flapping flight; Hovering; Unsteady wind

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25767146     DOI: 10.1242/jeb.114553

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Biol        ISSN: 0022-0949            Impact factor:   3.312


  12 in total

Review 1.  Aerodynamics, sensing and control of insect-scale flapping-wing flight.

Authors:  Wei Shyy; Chang-Kwon Kang; Pakpong Chirarattananon; Sridhar Ravi; Hao Liu
Journal:  Proc Math Phys Eng Sci       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 2.704

2.  Adaptive control of turbulence intensity is accelerated by frugal flow sampling.

Authors:  Daniel B Quinn; Yous van Halder; David Lentink
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2017-11       Impact factor: 4.118

3.  Limitations of rotational manoeuvrability in insects and hummingbirds: evaluating the effects of neuro-biomechanical delays and muscle mechanical power.

Authors:  Pan Liu; Bo Cheng
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2017-07       Impact factor: 4.118

4.  Sensory gaze stabilization in echolocating bats.

Authors:  O Eitan; G Kosa; Y Yovel
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2019-10-16       Impact factor: 5.349

5.  Foraging in an unsteady world: bumblebee flight performance in field-realistic turbulence.

Authors:  J D Crall; J J Chang; R L Oppenheimer; S A Combes
Journal:  Interface Focus       Date:  2017-02-06       Impact factor: 3.906

6.  Turbulence explains the accelerations of an eagle in natural flight.

Authors:  Kasey M Laurent; Bob Fogg; Tobias Ginsburg; Casey Halverson; Michael J Lanzone; Tricia A Miller; David W Winkler; Gregory P Bewley
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2021-06-08       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Avian surface reconstruction in free flight with application to flight stability analysis of a barn owl and peregrine falcon.

Authors:  Nicholas E Durston; Xue Wan; Jian G Liu; Shane P Windsor
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2019-05-08       Impact factor: 3.312

8.  Visual Sensory Signals Dominate Tactile Cues during Docked Feeding in Hummingbirds.

Authors:  Benjamin Goller; Paolo S Segre; Kevin M Middleton; Michael H Dickinson; Douglas L Altshuler
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2017-11-14       Impact factor: 4.677

9.  Bees with attitude: the effects of directed gusts on flight trajectories.

Authors:  Timothy Jakobi; Dmitry Kolomenskiy; Teruaki Ikeda; Simon Watkins; Alex Fisher; Hao Liu; Sridhar Ravi
Journal:  Biol Open       Date:  2018-10-08       Impact factor: 2.422

Review 10.  Biomechanics and biomimetics in insect-inspired flight systems.

Authors:  Hao Liu; Sridhar Ravi; Dmitry Kolomenskiy; Hiroto Tanaka
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2016-09-26       Impact factor: 6.237

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.