Literature DB >> 31067947

Task-dependence of articulator synergies.

Tanner Sorensen1, Asterios Toutios1, Louis Goldstein2, Shrikanth Narayanan1.   

Abstract

In speech production, the motor system organizes articulators such as the jaw, tongue, and lips into synergies whose function is to produce speech sounds by forming constrictions at the phonetic places of articulation. The present study tests whether synergies for different constriction tasks differ in terms of inter-articulator coordination. The test is conducted on utterances [ɑpɑ], [ɑtɑ], [ɑiɑ], and [ɑkɑ] with a real-time magnetic resonance imaging biomarker that is computed using a statistical model of the forward kinematics of the vocal tract. The present study is the first to estimate the forward kinematics of the vocal tract from speech production data. Using the imaging biomarker, the study finds that the jaw contributes least to the velar stop for [k], more to pharyngeal approximation for [ɑ], still more to palatal approximation for [i], and most to the coronal stop for [t]. Additionally, the jaw contributes more to the coronal stop for [t] than to the bilabial stop for [p]. Finally, the study investigates how this pattern of results varies by participant. The study identifies differences in inter-articulator coordination by constriction task, which support the claim that inter-articulator coordination differs depending on the active articulator synergy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31067947      PMCID: PMC6910022          DOI: 10.1121/1.5093538

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  27 in total

1.  Optimal feedback control as a theory of motor coordination.

Authors:  Emanuel Todorov; Michael I Jordan
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 24.884

2.  Metrology Standards for Quantitative Imaging Biomarkers.

Authors:  Daniel C Sullivan; Nancy A Obuchowski; Larry G Kessler; David L Raunig; Constantine Gatsonis; Erich P Huang; Marina Kondratovich; Lisa M McShane; Anthony P Reeves; Daniel P Barboriak; Alexander R Guimaraes; Richard L Wahl
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2015-08-12       Impact factor: 11.105

3.  Motor learning is optimally tuned to the properties of motor noise.

Authors:  Robert J van Beers
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2009-08-13       Impact factor: 17.173

4.  Signal-dependent noise determines motor planning.

Authors:  C M Harris; D M Wolpert
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1998-08-20       Impact factor: 49.962

5.  Test-retest repeatability of human speech biomarkers from static and real-time dynamic magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Johannes Töger; Tanner Sorensen; Krishna Somandepalli; Asterios Toutios; Sajan Goud Lingala; Shrikanth Narayanan; Krishna Nayak
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2017-05       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Temporal structure of motor variability is dynamically regulated and predicts motor learning ability.

Authors:  Howard G Wu; Yohsuke R Miyamoto; Luis Nicolas Gonzalez Castro; Bence P Ölveczky; Maurice A Smith
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2014-01-12       Impact factor: 24.884

7.  Morphological variation in the adult hard palate and posterior pharyngeal wall.

Authors:  Adam Lammert; Michael Proctor; Shrikanth Narayanan
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 2.297

8.  Region segmentation in the frequency domain applied to upper airway real-time magnetic resonance images.

Authors:  Erik Bresch; Shrikanth Narayanan
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 10.048

9.  Methods for quantifying tongue shape and complexity using ultrasound imaging.

Authors:  Katherine M Dawson; Mark K Tiede; D H Whalen
Journal:  Clin Linguist Phon       Date:  2015-11-20       Impact factor: 1.346

10.  Speech production as state feedback control.

Authors:  John F Houde; Srikantan S Nagarajan
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2011-10-25       Impact factor: 3.169

View more
  3 in total

1.  A modular architecture for articulatory synthesis from gestural specification.

Authors:  Rachel Alexander; Tanner Sorensen; Asterios Toutios; Shrikanth Narayanan
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2019-12       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  A deep joint sparse non-negative matrix factorization framework for identifying the common and subject-specific functional units of tongue motion during speech.

Authors:  Jonghye Woo; Fangxu Xing; Jerry L Prince; Maureen Stone; Arnold D Gomez; Timothy G Reese; Van J Wedeen; Georges El Fakhri
Journal:  Med Image Anal       Date:  2021-06-12       Impact factor: 13.828

3.  A multispeaker dataset of raw and reconstructed speech production real-time MRI video and 3D volumetric images.

Authors:  Yongwan Lim; Asterios Toutios; Yannick Bliesener; Ye Tian; Sajan Goud Lingala; Colin Vaz; Tanner Sorensen; Miran Oh; Sarah Harper; Weiyi Chen; Yoonjeong Lee; Johannes Töger; Mairym Lloréns Monteserin; Caitlin Smith; Bianca Godinez; Louis Goldstein; Dani Byrd; Krishna S Nayak; Shrikanth S Narayanan
Journal:  Sci Data       Date:  2021-07-20       Impact factor: 6.444

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.