Literature DB >> 31067347

Metastatic prostate cancer at diagnosis and through progression in the Prostate, Lung, Colorectal, and Ovarian Cancer Screening Trial.

Paul F Pinsky1, Amanda Black2, Sarah E Daugherty3, Robert Hoover2, Howard Parnes1, Zachary L Smith4, Scott Eggener5, Gerald L Andriole4, Sonja I Berndt2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The Prostate, Lung, Colorectal, and Ovarian (PLCO) Cancer Screening Trial assessed the effect of screening with prostate-specific antigen and a digital rectal examination on prostate cancer mortality. Another endpoint of interest was the burden of total metastatic disease.
METHODS: All men in PLCO were assessed for metastatic prostate cancer at diagnosis; men with clinical stage I/II disease were assessed for metastatic progression. The rate of total metastatic disease was defined as metastases found either at diagnosis or through progression divided by person-years (PYs) of follow-up for all men in the trial. Metastatic progression rates were computed among men with clinical stage I/II prostate cancer. Survival among men with metastases at diagnosis was compared with survival among men with metastatic progression.
RESULTS: Among 38,340 men in the intervention arm and 38,343 men in the control arm in PLCO, there were 4974 and 4699 prostate cancer cases, respectively. The rates of total metastatic disease were 4.72 and 4.83 per 10,000 PYs in the intervention and control arms, respectively (rate ratio, 0.98; 95% CI, 0.81-1.18). The rates of metastatic progression among men with clinical stage I/II prostate cancer were 43.7 and 50.5 per 10,000 PYs in the intervention and control arms, respectively (P = .30). Prostate cancer-specific 5- and 10-year survival rates were significantly worse for men with metastatic progression (24% and 19%, respectively) than men with metastases at diagnosis (40% and 26%, respectively).
CONCLUSIONS: Rates of total metastatic disease and metastatic progression were similar across arms in PLCO. Survival was worse for men with metastatic progression in comparison with those with metastatic disease at diagnosis.
© 2019 American Cancer Society.

Entities:  

Keywords:  metastatic disease; metastatic progression; prostate cancer; screening

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31067347      PMCID: PMC6690759          DOI: 10.1002/cncr.32176

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer        ISSN: 0008-543X            Impact factor:   6.860


  15 in total

Review 1.  A reevaluation of nonhormonal cytotoxic chemotherapy in the treatment of prostatic carcinoma.

Authors:  M A Eisenberger; R Simon; P J O'Dwyer; R E Wittes; M A Friedman
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  1985-06       Impact factor: 44.544

2.  Commentary on "prostate cancer screening in the randomized prostate, lung, colorectal, and ovarian cancer screening trial: Mortality results after 13 years of follow-up". Andriole GL, Crawford ED, Grubb RL III, Buys SS, Chia D, Church TR, Fouad MN, Isaacs C, Kvale PA, Reding DJ, Weissfeld JL, Yokochi LA, O'Brien B, Ragard LR, Clapp JD, Rathmell JM, Riley TL, Hsing AW, Izmirlian G, Pinsky PF, Kramer BS, Miller AB, Gohagan JK, Prorok PC; PLCO Project Team.Collaborators (18) Buring JE, Alberts D, Carter HB, Chodak G, Hawk E, Malm H, Mayer RJ, Piantadosi S, Silvestri GA, Thompson IM, Westhoff CL, Kahn JP, Levin B, DeMets D, O'Fallon JR, Porter AT, Ashton MM, Black WC, Division of Urologic Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO 63130, USA: J. Natl Cancer Inst 2012; 104(2):125-32. Epub January 6, 2012.

Authors:  Joseph A Smith
Journal:  Urol Oncol       Date:  2012 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.498

3.  Assessing contamination and compliance in the prostate component of the Prostate, Lung, Colorectal, and Ovarian (PLCO) Cancer Screening Trial.

Authors:  Paul F Pinsky; Amanda Blacka; Barnett S Kramer; Anthony Miller; Philip C Prorok; Christine Berg
Journal:  Clin Trials       Date:  2010-06-22       Impact factor: 2.486

4.  Screening for prostate cancer decreases the risk of developing metastatic disease: findings from the European Randomized Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer (ERSPC).

Authors:  Fritz H Schröder; Jonas Hugosson; Sigrid Carlsson; Teuvo Tammela; Liisa Määttänen; Anssi Auvinen; Maciej Kwiatkowski; Franz Recker; Monique J Roobol
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2012-06-07       Impact factor: 20.096

5.  Screening for Prostate Cancer: US Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation Statement.

Authors:  David C Grossman; Susan J Curry; Douglas K Owens; Kirsten Bibbins-Domingo; Aaron B Caughey; Karina W Davidson; Chyke A Doubeni; Mark Ebell; John W Epling; Alex R Kemper; Alex H Krist; Martha Kubik; C Seth Landefeld; Carol M Mangione; Michael Silverstein; Melissa A Simon; Albert L Siu; Chien-Wen Tseng
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2018-05-08       Impact factor: 56.272

6.  Effect of a Low-Intensity PSA-Based Screening Intervention on Prostate Cancer Mortality: The CAP Randomized Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Richard M Martin; Jenny L Donovan; Emma L Turner; Chris Metcalfe; Grace J Young; Eleanor I Walsh; J Athene Lane; Sian Noble; Steven E Oliver; Simon Evans; Jonathan A C Sterne; Peter Holding; Yoav Ben-Shlomo; Peter Brindle; Naomi J Williams; Elizabeth M Hill; Siaw Yein Ng; Jessica Toole; Marta K Tazewell; Laura J Hughes; Charlotte F Davies; Joanna C Thorn; Elizabeth Down; George Davey Smith; David E Neal; Freddie C Hamdy
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2018-03-06       Impact factor: 56.272

7.  Extended mortality results for prostate cancer screening in the PLCO trial with median follow-up of 15 years.

Authors:  Paul F Pinsky; Philip C Prorok; Kelly Yu; Barnett S Kramer; Amanda Black; John K Gohagan; E David Crawford; Robert L Grubb; Gerald L Andriole
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2016-12-01       Impact factor: 6.860

8.  Meta-Analysis Evaluating the Impact of Site of Metastasis on Overall Survival in Men With Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer.

Authors:  Susan Halabi; William Kevin Kelly; Hua Ma; Haojin Zhou; Nicole C Solomon; Karim Fizazi; Catherine M Tangen; Mark Rosenthal; Daniel P Petrylak; Maha Hussain; Nicholas J Vogelzang; Ian M Thompson; Kim N Chi; Johann de Bono; Andrew J Armstrong; Mario A Eisenberger; Abderrahim Fandi; Shaoyi Li; John C Araujo; Christopher J Logothetis; David I Quinn; Michael J Morris; Celestia S Higano; Ian F Tannock; Eric J Small
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2016-03-07       Impact factor: 44.544

9.  Screening and prostate cancer mortality: results of the European Randomised Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer (ERSPC) at 13 years of follow-up.

Authors:  Fritz H Schröder; Jonas Hugosson; Monique J Roobol; Teuvo L J Tammela; Marco Zappa; Vera Nelen; Maciej Kwiatkowski; Marcos Lujan; Liisa Määttänen; Hans Lilja; Louis J Denis; Franz Recker; Alvaro Paez; Chris H Bangma; Sigrid Carlsson; Donella Puliti; Arnauld Villers; Xavier Rebillard; Matti Hakama; Ulf-Hakan Stenman; Paula Kujala; Kimmo Taari; Gunnar Aus; Andreas Huber; Theo H van der Kwast; Ron H N van Schaik; Harry J de Koning; Sue M Moss; Anssi Auvinen
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2014-08-06       Impact factor: 79.321

10.  The outcome of prostate cancer patients treated with curative intent strongly depends on survival after metastatic progression.

Authors:  Mariarosa Pascale; Che Ngwa Azinwi; Barbara Marongiu; Gianfranco Pesce; Flavio Stoffel; Enrico Roggero
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2017-09-18       Impact factor: 4.430

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.