Literature DB >> 22704366

Screening for prostate cancer decreases the risk of developing metastatic disease: findings from the European Randomized Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer (ERSPC).

Fritz H Schröder1, Jonas Hugosson, Sigrid Carlsson, Teuvo Tammela, Liisa Määttänen, Anssi Auvinen, Maciej Kwiatkowski, Franz Recker, Monique J Roobol.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Metastatic disease is a major morbidity of prostate cancer (PCa). Its prevention is an important goal.
OBJECTIVE: To assess the effect of screening for PCa on the incidence of metastatic disease in a randomized trial. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Data were available for 76,813 men aged 55-69 yr coming from four centers of the European Randomized Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer (ERSPC). The presence of metastatic disease was evaluated by imaging or by prostate-specific antigen (PSA) values >100 ng/ml at diagnosis and during follow-up. INTERVENTION: Regular screening based on serum PSA measurements was offered to 36270 men randomized to the screening arm, while no screening was provided to the 40543 men in the control arm. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: The Nelson-Aalen technique and Poisson regression were used to calculate cumulative incidence and rate ratios of M+ disease. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: After a median follow-up of 12 yr, 666 men with M+ PCa were detected, 256 in the screening arm and 410 in the control arm, resulting in cumulative incidence of 0.67% and 0.86% per 1000 men, respectively (p<0.001). This finding translated into a relative reduction of 30% (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.70; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.60-0.82; p=0.001) in the intention-to-screen analysis and a 42% (p=0.0001) reduction for men who were actually screened. An absolute risk reduction of metastatic disease of 3.1 per 1000 men randomized (0.31%) was found. A large discrepancy was seen when comparing the rates of M+ detected at diagnosis and all M+ cases that emerged during the total follow-up period, a 50% reduction (HR: 0.50; 95% CI, 0.41-0.62) versus the 30% reduction. The main limitation is incomplete explanation of the lack of an effect of screening during follow-up.
CONCLUSIONS: PSA screening significantly reduces the risk of developing metastatic PCa. However, despite earlier diagnosis with screening, certain men still progress and develop metastases. The ERSPC trial is registered under number ISRCTN49127736.
Copyright © 2012 European Association of Urology. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22704366     DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2012.05.068

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Urol        ISSN: 0302-2838            Impact factor:   20.096


  67 in total

1.  Assessing treatment benefit with competing risks not affected by the randomized treatment.

Authors:  Edward L Korn; James J Dignam; Boris Freidlin
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2014-11-03       Impact factor: 2.373

2.  Reconsidering the Trade-offs of Prostate Cancer Screening.

Authors:  Jonathan E Shoag; Yaw A Nyame; Roman Gulati; Ruth Etzioni; Jim C Hu
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2020-06-18       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 3.  Prostate Cancer Screening.

Authors:  William J Catalona
Journal:  Med Clin North Am       Date:  2018-03       Impact factor: 5.456

4.  Implications of prostate-specific antigen screening guidelines on clinical practice at a Canadian regional community hospital.

Authors:  Todd M Webster; Erika Lau; Ken J Newell
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2017-08       Impact factor: 1.862

5.  Prostate cancer: Lessons from PIVOT lost in media hype.

Authors:  Benjamin J Davies
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2012-08-07       Impact factor: 14.432

Review 6.  Risk-based prostate cancer screening: who and how?

Authors:  Allison S Glass; K Clint Cary; Matthew R Cooperberg
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 3.092

7.  Update of randomized trials for prostate cancer screening.

Authors:  Annelies Vellekoop; Stacy Loeb
Journal:  Rev Urol       Date:  2013

Review 8.  What's new in screening in 2015?

Authors:  Sigrid V Carlsson; Monique J Roobol
Journal:  Curr Opin Urol       Date:  2016-09       Impact factor: 2.309

9.  Changes in Prostate Cancer Presentation Following the 2012 USPSTF Screening Statement: Observational Study in a Multispecialty Group Practice.

Authors:  Michael J Barry
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2020-05       Impact factor: 5.128

10.  [PSA screening 2013: background and perspectives].

Authors:  F Recker; D Seiler; B Seifert; M Randazzo; M Kwiatkowski
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 0.639

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.