Literature DB >> 31066456

Persistent Salmonella enterica Serovar Typhimurium Infection Induces Protease Expression During Intestinal Fibrosis.

Katrin Ehrhardt1, Natalie Steck2, Reinhild Kappelhoff3, Stephanie Stein2, Florian Rieder4, Ilyssa O Gordon5, Erin C Boyle6,7, Peter Braubach8, Christopher M Overall3, B Brett Finlay9, Guntram A Grassl1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Intestinal fibrosis is a common and serious complication of Crohn's disease characterized by the accumulation of fibroblasts, deposition of extracellular matrix, and formation of scar tissue. Although many factors including cytokines and proteases contribute to the development of intestinal fibrosis, the initiating mechanisms and the complex interplay between these factors remain unclear.
METHODS: Chronic infection of mice with Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium was used to induce intestinal fibrosis. A murine protease-specific CLIP-CHIP microarray analysis was employed to assess regulation of proteases and protease inhibitors. To confirm up- or downregulation during fibrosis, we performed quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and immunohistochemical stainings in mouse tissue and tissue from patients with inflammatory bowel disease. In vitro infections were used to demonstrate a direct effect of bacterial infection in the regulation of proteases.
RESULTS: Mice develop severe and persistent intestinal fibrosis upon chronic infection with Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium, mimicking the pathology of human disease. Microarray analyses revealed 56 up- and 40 downregulated proteases and protease inhibitors in fibrotic cecal tissue. Various matrix metalloproteases, serine proteases, cysteine proteases, and protease inhibitors were regulated in the fibrotic tissue, 22 of which were confirmed by quantitative real-time PCR. Proteases demonstrated site-specific staining patterns in intestinal fibrotic tissue from mice and in tissue from human inflammatory bowel disease patients. Finally, we show in vitro that Salmonella infection directly induces protease expression in macrophages and epithelial cells but not in fibroblasts.
CONCLUSIONS: In summary, we show that chronic Salmonella infection regulates proteases and protease inhibitors during tissue fibrosis in vivo and in vitro, and therefore this model is well suited to investigating the role of proteases in intestinal fibrosis.
© 2019 Crohn’s & Colitis Foundation. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Crohn’s & Colitis Foundation.

Entities:  

Keywords:  zzm321990 Salmonellazzm321990 ; inflammation; intestinal fibrosis; proteases

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31066456      PMCID: PMC6749888          DOI: 10.1093/ibd/izz070

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Inflamm Bowel Dis        ISSN: 1078-0998            Impact factor:   5.325


INTRODUCTION

Intestinal fibrosis is a common complication of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), especially in Crohn’s disease (CD) patients due to transmural inflammation and pathology usually affecting the entire thickness of the bowel wall.[1] Although many cell types (fibroblasts, smooth muscle cells, endothelial or epithelial cells) and soluble factors including cytokines, growth factors, and proteases have been identified to be involved in intestinal fibrosis, the initiating mechanisms and the complex interplay between these factors during disease development remain elusive.[2] Proteases in the intestine are produced by various cell types and fulfill a number of important functions in health and disease, including tissue remodeling, nutrient digestion, modulating intestinal barrier function, activating signaling cascades, and modulating host defense to infections.[3, 4] Proteases can be classified as metallo-, aspartic, cysteine, serine, and threonine proteases, depending on the nature of the functional group at their active sites. The family of matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs) comprises 23 members in humans and mice and is divided into subfamilies according to their domain structure: collagenases, gelatinases, stromelysins, matrilysins, elastases, membrane-type MMPs, and others.[5] MMPs act like “molecular scissors,” with their primary substrates being extracellular matrix (ECM) components such as collagens, laminins, fibronectins, and elastins; however, many more substrates including cytokines, chemokines, membrane receptors, and antimicrobial peptides have recently been identified.[6] To prevent excessive proteolytic activity and tissue damage, protease synthesis, storage, and activity are tightly controlled. For example, MMPs are activated by proteolytic cleavage, and their activity is controlled by specific tissue inhibitors of metalloproteinases (TIMPs) and by nonspecific inhibitors (eg, α2-macroglobulin).[7] Aberrant expression and/or activity of MMPs have been reported in several pathologies including cardiovascular diseases, obesity, type II diabetes,[8] cancer, IBD, and fibrosis.[9, 10] With regard to intestinal fibrosis, dysregulation of MMPs is thought to play a crucial role in the massive remodeling and excessive collagen accumulation that occurs within the intestinal wall.[11] Dysregulation of MMPs and its inhibitors is in part due to the aberrant production of transforming growth factor–β (TGF-β) during fibrosis.[12] Recently, it was shown that inhibition of MMP9 ameliorates intestinal fibrosis in a heterotopic intestinal transplant model.[13] Little is known about the early developmental stages of intestinal fibrosis. Various animal models are available for IBD; however, very few can be used to study fibrogenic processes in the intestine.[14] Previously, we described characteristics of chronic colitis and intestinal fibrosis in Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium (S. Typhimurium)–infected mice, which resembled many features frequently seen in fibrotic lesions of Crohn’s disease patients.[15, 16] In the course of persistent infection, animals develop severe transmural inflammation, accompanied by extensive type I collagen deposition and increased levels of transforming growth factor–β1, connective tissue growth factor, and insulin-like growth factor 1. Our studies and others have demonstrated that S. Typhimurium–induced colitis is a useful model to study early and progressive events in the development of intestinal fibrosis.[17-19] Here, we identify proteases and their inhibitors associated with the development of intestinal fibrosis by using the S. Typhimurium–induced colitis mouse model.

METHODS

Mice and Bacterial Infection

129Sv/J mice were bred in the Animal Unit at the University of British Columbia (UBC). C57Bl/6J mice were purchased from Jackson Laboratories (Bar Harbour, ME, USA) and housed at the Research Center in Borstel, Germany. S. Typhimurium SL1344[20] and S. Typhimurium SL1344 ∆aroA[15] were grown overnight in Luria-Bertani broth at 37°C with shaking. At an age of 8–12 weeks, mice were given 20 mg of streptomycin by oral gavage 24 hours before infection by oral gavage with 3 × 106S. Typhimurium suspended in 100 µL of HEPES buffer (100 mmol/L, pH 8.0).

Ethics Statement

All experiments were conducted in accordance with the ethical requirements and approval of the Animal Care Committee at UBC and of the Animal Care Committee of the Ministry of Energy, Agriculture, the Environment and Rural Areas of Schleswig-Holstein, Germany, and in direct accordance with the German Animal Protection Law. The protocols were approved by the Ministry of Energy, Agriculture, the Environment and Rural Areas of Schleswig-Holstein, Germany (Protocol#: V244-7224.121.3). Approval for the use of human tissue samples was obtained by the Institutional Review Board of the Cleveland Clinic, Ohio. Tissue samples were collected from CD and UC patients or from non-inflamed tissue samples from non-IBD patients.

Cell Culture and In Vitro Infections

NIH 3T3 mouse fibroblasts were grown in DMEM containing 10% newborn calf serum. Mode-K mouse intestinal epithelial cells were grown in DMEM containing 10% fetal calf serum (FCS) and 1% 4-(2-hydroxyethyl)-1-piperazineethanesulfonic acid (HEPES). To obtain primary bone marrow–derived macrophages (BMDM), the bone marrow from mouse femurs and tibia was flushed out with phosphate buffered saline (PBS), and the cells were differentiated in Dulbecco’s Modified Eagle’s Medium (DMEM) containing 10% FCS, penicillin (100 U/mL), streptomycin (100 µg/mL), 1% HEPES, and 50 ng/mL of macrophage colony-stimulating factor (M-CSF). After 1 day, macrophage progenitors were separated from the adherent fibroblasts. BMDM were cultured for another 6 days before infection. All cells were cultured at 37°C in a humidified atmosphere with 5% CO2. One day before infection, cells were seeded into 24-well plates in their respective medium without antibiotics. Bacteria were grown overnight in Luria-Bertani broth at 37°C with shaking, diluted 1:30, and grown to mid-logarithmic phase. Fibroblasts and BMDM were infected with S. Typhimurium at a multiplicity of infection (MOI) of 10, and Mode-K cells were infected with an MOI of 50. Gentamicin protection assays were performed as previously described.[21]

Murine CLIP-CHIP Microarray Analysis

The murine CLIP-CHIP is a custom DNA microarray that covers all murine proteases, inactive homologues, and their inhibitors.[22] The murine CLIP-CHIP contains 70-mer oligonucleotides for 27 aspartic, 158 cysteine, 204 metallo-, 221 serine, and 26 threonine proteases, along with 187 protease inhibitor gene transcripts. Each glass slide contains 2 copies of the CLIP-CHIP microarray that can be used as a technical replicate for statistical analysis. Apart from protease and protease inhibitor oligonucleotides, the microarray also contains positive and negative control oligonucleotides. Total RNA was isolated from cecal tissues using the RNeasy-Mini Kit with an on-column DNaseI treatment (Qiagen, Mississauga, ON, Canada). The CLIP-CHIP microarray sample preparation was conducted as described in Kappelhoff et al.[22] and Kappelhoff and Overall.[23] In brief, using the Message Amp II kit (Ambion, Austin, TX, USA), 1 µg of total RNA was reversed-transcribed into cDNA. Second-strand synthesis was performed using DNA polymerase. Purified dsDNA was used for linear amplification of amplified RNA (aRNA) by the T7 RNA polymerase. Using the universal linking system (ULS) aRNA labeling kit (Kreatech, Amsterdam, the Netherlands), 2 µg of aRNA (from control or fibrotic tissue) was labeled with Cy5-ULS, and a universal reference RNA was labeled with Cy3-ULS. Experimental and reference RNAs were then pooled and hybridized to a murine CLIP-CHIP microarray. Microarray scanning and image and data analyses were done as described in Kappelhoff et al.[24] In brief, after stringent washes, the CLIP-CHIP microarrays were scanned using the 428 Array Scanner (MWG), and images were analyzed using ImaGene6.1 Software (Biodiscovery). CarmaWEB software was used to normalize the data, and MeV from the TM4 Microarray Suite (www.tigr.org) was used for statistical analysis. Significance analysis for microarrays (SAM) was performed according to Tusher et al.[25] using 924 unique permutations in a 2-class unpaired analysis with a delta value of 2.254 for a false discovery rate of 0%. SAM was used to find significant changes in expression of proteases and protease inhibitors. The hierarchical cluster analysis of significant genes was done using Pearson correlation with a complete linkage method in MeV.

Quantitative Real-time Polymerase Chain Reaction

RNA was extracted from mouse cecal tissue using the High Pure RNA Tissue Kit (Roche). RNA was reverse-transcribed into cDNA using the cDNA Synthesis Kit (Roche) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Quantitative real-time PCR (qPCR) was performed with SYBR-Green Mastermix (Roche) and gene-specific primers (Table 1). Data were normalized to house-keeping genes Gapdh and Hprt1, and fold regulation was calculated using the ΔΔCt method.
TABLE 1.

Primers Used in This Study

Primer NameSequence
Cathepsin C FCCAAGGCTTCGAGATTGTGT
Cathepsin C RCCACCCAGTCATGGTCTCAT
Cathepsin D FAGCATTAGTTCTCCTCCGGG
Cathepsin D RCCGGTCTTTGACAACCTGAT
Cathepsin K FCGGCTATATGACCACTGCCT
Cathepsin K RTGCCGTGGCGTTATACATAC
GAPDH FATTGTCAGCAATGCATCCTG
GAPDH RATGGACTGTGGTCATGAGCC
Granzyme K FCTAAAACCACGGTGGGAGAG
Granzyme K RGCAGCAAGCATATTTGTGGA
HPRT FAGTGTTGGATACAGGCCAGAC
HPRT RCGTGATTCAAATCCCTGAAGT
Meprin beta FTTTGGGTCTGGACCTTTTTG
Meprin beta RTGGTATGTGGCCATCTCTTG
klk1b5 FTGATCCTGTTCCTAGCCCTG
klk1b5 RGAAGCGGTACACAGCCACTT
klk1b8 FCTAGCCCTGTCCCTAGGAGG
klk1b8 RCCAGGGTTGGGAATTCTTCT
klk1b22 F CCTGATCCTGTTCCTAACCC
klk1b22 RCCAGGGTTGGGAATTCTTCT
MMP10 FAGCCACAAGTTGATGCTGTG
MMP10 RTATGTGTGTCACCGTCCTGG
MMP13 FTGATGAAACCTGGACAAGCA
MMP13 RGGTCCTTGGAGTGATCCAGA
MMP2 FCCAGCAAGTAGATGCTGCCT
MMP2 RGGGGTCCATTTTCTTCTTCA
MMP3 FCGATGATGAACGATGGACAG
MMP3 RAGCCTTGGCTGAGTGGTAGA
MMP7 FAGTTTTCCAGTCATGGGCAG
MMP7 RCACATCAGTGGGAACAGGC
MMP8 FCGCCTGAAGACACTTCCATT
MMP8 RCCGGAATTGATTGCTTGGTA
PAR-1 FAGGGGGACCAGTTCAAATGT
PAR-1 RGTCCCTATGAGCCAGCCAG
PAR-2 FGTTCTACCGGAACCCCTTTC
PAR-2 RTGGGAGGTATCACCCTTCTG
PAR-4 F CACTGTCGTTGGCACAGAAT
PAR-4 RAGAGAGTACCAGGGGAAGCC
Serpina3m F GGAGTCAGCTATCACAGAGGC
Serpina3m RTCTGAGAAGCAGAGGACGGT
Stefin A1 F AACCTGCCACACCAGAAATC
Stefin A1 RCTCAACGGCTTCGAATTTTT
Timp-1 FATCTGGCATCCTCTTGTTGC
Timp-1 RTGGGGAACCCATGAATTTAG
Tryptase g FGTGGTCCTGACTCTGCTGTG
Tryptase g RGAGTTTGAAACCTGGGGATG
Primers Used in This Study

Immunohistochemistry

Formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissue sections were deparaffinized and rehydrated. Samples included cecum tissue from uninfected (n = 5) and infected (n = 5) mice and human colon samples from non-IBD (n = 5), UC (n = 5), or CD (n = 5) patients. Antigen unmasking was achieved by heat treatment in 10 mM of sodium citrate buffer (pH 6.0) or Tris-EDTA buffer (pH 9.0) for 30 minutes. Specimens were incubated with blocking reagent containing 1% bovine serum albumin, 0.1% Triton X-100, 0.05% Tween 20, and 2% normal goat serum. Antigen retrieval, primary antibodies, and dilutions are listed in Supplementary Table 1. Horseradish peroxidase-labeled secondary antibodies were used and were followed by incubation with 3,3’Diaminobenzidine (DAB) substrate. Negative controls were done by omission of the primary antibody. The pattern (focal, patchy, or diffuse) and intensity (0–3) of antibody staining were analyzed in the epithelium, lamina propria, submucosa, and muscularis propria. Representative images are shown and were obtained using an Olympus BX41 microscope.

Statistics

Statistical analysis of qPCR and bacterial colonization data was performed using the GraphPad Prism 5 software package (GraphPad Software, San Diego, CA, USA). One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Tukey’s multiple comparison tests were used to determine significance between multiple data sets. The Student t test was used to compare two groups. A P value <0.05 was considered statistically significant.

RESULTS

Salmonella-Induced Intestinal Fibrosis in Mice Is Linked to the Differential Regulation of Multiple Proteases

We have previously shown that long-term infection with S. Typhimurium leads to chronic inflammation and the development of fibrosis in the cecum and colon of mice.[15] 129Sv/J mice infected with wild-type S. Typhimurium developed persistent fibrosis in the cecum, peaking 21 days postinfection. At this time point, ceca were inflamed and fibrotic. Crypt architecture was destroyed, and the mucosa, submucosa, and muscularis were infiltrated with large amounts of inflammatory cells and fibroblasts. In addition, collagen was deposited in the mucosa and submucosa, as visualized by Masson’s Trichrome staining (Fig. 1A). Microarray analysis on cecal tissue was performed to identify proteases and protease inhibitors regulated during chronic inflammation and fibrosis. We used the murine CLIP-CHIP degradome microarray, which is a dedicated and focused array that allows analysis of all 636 proteases and 187 protease inhibitor gene transcripts in the murine genome at the mRNA transcript level.[22]
FIGURE 1.

Chronic Salmonella infection in mice induces expression of proteases and their inhibitors. 129SvJ mice were treated with streptomycin and 24 hours later infected with Salmonella Typhimurium. Twenty-one days post-infection, the mice were killed and their tissues collected. A, Histopathological changes in chronically inflamed ceca (hematoxylin and eosin staining). ECM deposition is apparent in the submucosa and mucosa of infected mice, as visualized by Masson’s Trichrome staining. Abbreviations: L, lumen; M, mucosa; SM, submucosa. B, Significance analysis for microarrays with hierarchical cluster analysis using a Pearson correlation average linkage method revealed 56 upregulated and (C) 40 downregulated proteases and inhibitor gene transcripts in the fibrotic cecum in comparison with the control cecum on murine CLIP-CHIP microarray.

Chronic Salmonella infection in mice induces expression of proteases and their inhibitors. 129SvJ mice were treated with streptomycin and 24 hours later infected with Salmonella Typhimurium. Twenty-one days post-infection, the mice were killed and their tissues collected. A, Histopathological changes in chronically inflamed ceca (hematoxylin and eosin staining). ECM deposition is apparent in the submucosa and mucosa of infected mice, as visualized by Masson’s Trichrome staining. Abbreviations: L, lumen; M, mucosa; SM, submucosa. B, Significance analysis for microarrays with hierarchical cluster analysis using a Pearson correlation average linkage method revealed 56 upregulated and (C) 40 downregulated proteases and inhibitor gene transcripts in the fibrotic cecum in comparison with the control cecum on murine CLIP-CHIP microarray. Significance analysis for microarrays of the microarray data revealed 96 significantly regulated proteases and inhibitors. Fifty-six genes were upregulated and 40 genes were downregulated in fibrotic cecal tissue when compared with normal control tissue from mock-infected mice (Fig. 1B, C, Table 2, Table 3; see Supplementary Data Table S2 for a complete list of CLIP-CHIP results).
TABLE 2.

Significantly Upregulated Protease and Protease Inhibitor Transcripts Detected With the Murine CLIP-CHIP During Salmonella-Induced Fibrosis

Merops IDDescriptionGeneRefSeq_1Fold Change
M10.006stromelysin 2Mmp10NM_01947121.99
M10.013collagenase 3Mmp13NM_00860712.85
C01.070cathepsin CCtscNM_00998211.43
M10.002collagenase 2Mmp8NM_00861110.62
I04.xxxa1-antitrypsin member 3gSerpina3gXM_48417510.17
S01.196complement factor BBfNM_0081988.03
S01.192complement component C1raC1raNM_0231437.65
I39.950nicomplement component 3C3NM_0097787.15
I35.001tissue inhibitor of metalloprotease-1Timp1NM_0115936.73
T01.013proteasome catalytic subunit 1iPsmb9NM_0135856.28
T01.015proteasome catalytic subunit 3iPsmb8NM_0107246.25
I04.024C1 inhibitorSerping1NM_0097766.09
C01.040cathepsin HCtshNM_0078015.28
M14.015npcarboxypeptidase X1Cpx1NM_0196965.15
I25.xxxstefin-2 likeCsta1bNM_1738695.02
S01.972nphaptoglobin-1HpNM_0173704.79
A02.059DDI-related proteaseDdi-rpNM_0264144.77
I04.xxxa1-antitrypsin member 3mSerpina3mNM_0092534.42
S60.001lactotransferrinLtfNM_0085224.40
C01.013cathepsin ZCtszNM_0223254.22
C46.002sonic hedgehog proteinShhNM_0091704.02
I25.xxxstefin A3Stfa3NM_0252883.79
S01.155pancreatic elastase II (IIA)Ela2aNM_0157793.79
C01.037cathepsin WCtswNM_0099853.73
M10.005stromelysin 1Mmp3NM_0108093.72
S01.246kallikrein hK10mKlk10NM_1337123.69
I04.xxxa1-antitrypsin member 3nSerpina3nNM_0092523.68
C19.030USP18Usp18NM_0119093.64
M10.014MT1-MMPMmp14NM_0086083.49
I04.005protein Z-dependent PISerpina10NM_1448343.38
C01.034cathepsin SCtssNM_0212813.37
I01.xxxfollistatin-like 1Fstl1NM_0080473.37
C48.xxxsentrin/SUMO protease 14Senp14BN0003893.32
S01.146granzyme KGzmkNM_0081963.19
I04.xxxa1-antitrypsin member 3fSerpina3fBC0499753.12
M10.008matrilysinMmp7NM_0108103.02
I39.001a-2-macroglobulinA2mNM_1756283.00
A01.009cathepsin DCtsdNM_0099832.99
S01.131neutrophil elastaseEla2NM_0157792.96
I01.xxxfollistatin-like 2/IGFBP7Igfbp7NM_0080482.92
I04.014protease inhibitor 9/CAP3Serpinb9NM_0092562.80
I01.xxxosteonectinSparcNM_0092422.76
T01.014proteasome catalytic subunit 2iPsmb10NM_0136402.67
C14.013caspase-12Casp12NM_0098082.53
T03.022gamma-glutamyltransferase 6Ggt6NM_0278192.49
I32.003cIAP2Birc2NM_0074642.32
M17.001leucyl aminopeptidaseLap3NM_0244342.31
A01.046napsin AKdapNM_0084372.28
A01.010cathepsin ECtseNM_0077992.20
Cx1.xxxnpHetF-likeHetflNM_0244772.04
S01.099testis serine protease 4Tessp4NM_1994711.94
A22.003presenilin homolog 3/SPPPsh3NM_0103761.91
C02.002calpain 2Capn2NM_0097941.90
I04.021proteinase nexin 1/GDNSerpine2NM_0092551.90
I04.xxxprotease inhibitor 6bSerpinb6bNM_0114541.86
S01.216coagulation factor XaF10NM_0079721.86

The letter in front of a number refers to the protease class (A, aspartic protease; C, cysteine protease; M, metalloprotease; S, serine protease; T, threonine protease; I, protease inhibitor).

TABLE 3.

Significantly Downregulated Protease and Protease Inhibitor Transcripts Detected With the Murine CLIP-CHIP During Salmonella-Induced Fibrosis

Merops IDDescriptionGeneRefSeq_1Fold Change
S01.037glandular kallikrein mK5mGk5NM_008456–19.49
S01.xxxglandular kallikrein mK6mGk6NM_010639–18.74
S01.066npglandular kallikrein mK4mGk4NM_010915–17.74
S01.067glandular kallikrein mK8mGk8NM_008457–12.53
S01.306kallikrein hK13mKlk13NM_010115–12.51
S01.170glandular kallikrein mK3mGk3NM_008693–10.87
S01.141mast cell protease 1Mcpt1NM_008570–10.34
S01.041glandular kallikrein mK11mGk11NM_010640–8.81
S01.164glandular kallikrein mK1mGk1NM_010645–7.36
S01.070glandular kallikrein mK26mGk26NM_010644–6.93
M19.001membrane dipeptidaseDpep1NM_007876–5.73
I17.xxxWAP four-disulfide core 2Wfdc2NM_026323–4.84
S01.003mast cell protease 2Mcpt2NM_008571–4.66
M24.028methionyl aminopeptidase-like 1Metapl1NM_025633–4.41
C46.003indian hedgehog proteinIhhNM_010544–3.78
M12.004meprin beta subunitMep1bNM_008586–3.40
S01.256chymopasinCtrlNM_023182–3.18
S01.028tryptase gamma 1Tpsg1NM_012034–3.07
I01.xxxniserine PI Kazal type 4Spink4NM_011463–2.88
C64.xxxHin-2Hshin2XM_358202–2.46
C19.037VDU1Usp33NM_133247–2.45
S01.325epidermis-specific SP-likeEssplBN000135–2.33
C19.047USP24Usp24XM_131566–2.29
S01.291HAT-related proteaseHatrpNM_183109–2.28
M14.004carboxypeptidase NCpnNM_030703–2.21
I17.xxxWAP four-disulfide core 5Wfdc5NM_145369–2.21
S01.033hyaluronan-binding ser-proteaseHabp2NM_146101–2.17
I02.xxxeppinSpinlw1NM_029325–2.13
S01.294HAT-like 3Hatl3NM_001030297–2.12
I04.953niangiotensinogen/AGTSerpina8NM_007428–2.10
C19.067USP34Usp34XM_483996–2.09
M48.017metalloprotease related protein 1Mprp-1NM_025909–2.06
S01.242tryptase beta 2Mcpt6NM_010781–2.02
S54.952npEGF receptor related sequenceEgfr-rsNM_010117–1.93
S01.073glandular kallikrein mK27mGk27NM_020268–1.92
M10.030epilysinMmp28NM_080453–1.82
I02.007HGF activator inhibitor 1Spint1NM_016907–1.81
T01.978npproteasome alpha 8 subunitPsma8AK010717–1.78
I39.951nicomplement component 4C4NM_009780–1.70
I04.xxxprotease inhibitor 6dSerpinb6dXM_111521–1.60

The letter in front of a number refers to the protease class (A, aspartic protease; C, cysteine protease; M, metalloprotease; S, serine protease; T, threonine protease; I, protease inhibitor).

Significantly Upregulated Protease and Protease Inhibitor Transcripts Detected With the Murine CLIP-CHIP During Salmonella-Induced Fibrosis The letter in front of a number refers to the protease class (A, aspartic protease; C, cysteine protease; M, metalloprotease; S, serine protease; T, threonine protease; I, protease inhibitor). Significantly Downregulated Protease and Protease Inhibitor Transcripts Detected With the Murine CLIP-CHIP During Salmonella-Induced Fibrosis The letter in front of a number refers to the protease class (A, aspartic protease; C, cysteine protease; M, metalloprotease; S, serine protease; T, threonine protease; I, protease inhibitor). The differential expression of proteases and protease inhibitors was further confirmed by qPCR analysis. Some of the most strongly upregulated proteases were from the MMP family. Expression of Mmp3, Mmp7, Mmp8, Mmp10, and Mmp13 was strongly increased in fibrotic cecal tissue 21 days post-infection (Fig. 2A). In contrast, expression of Mmp2 did not change during infection. Of note, the epithelial barrier–promoting metalloprotease meprin-β (Mep1b) was significantly downregulated in fibrotic tissue. As depicted in Figure 2B, expression of glandular kallikreins Klk1b5, Klk1b8, and Klk1b22 and tryptase-γ (Tpsg1) was significantly decreased, whereas expression of granzyme K (Gzmk) increased upon fibrosis development. The induction of several cathepsins (Ctsc, Ctsd, Ctsk) was confirmed by our qPCR results (Fig. 2C). Various protease inhibitors including Serpina3m and stefinA1 (Stfa1), along with the tissue inhibitor of metalloproteases-1 (Timp1), were also confirmed to be upregulated (Fig. 2D) during S. Typhimurium–induced intestinal fibrosis. Taken together, our analysis indicated an enhanced expression of MMPs and an impairment of serine protease expression.
FIGURE 2.

Verification of protease, protease inhibitor, and protease-activated receptor (PAR) regulation in ceca by quantitative real-time PCR 21 days post-infection. A, Metalloproteases: Mmp3, Mmp7, Mmp8, Mmp10, and Mmp13 are upregulated, Mepb1 (meprin-β) is downregulated, and Mmp2 expression is unchanged. B, Serine proteases glandular kallikreins (Klk1b5, Klk1b8, Klk1b22) and Tpsg1 (tryptase-γ) are downregulated, and Gzmk (granzyme-K) is upregulated in the fibrotic cecum. C, Cysteine proteases cathepsin C and K (Ctsc and Ctsk) and the aspartic protease cathepsin D (Ctsd) are upregulated in fibrotic cecum. D, Protease inhibitors Serpina3m, Timp1 (tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinase 1), and Stfa1 (stefin A1) are upregulated in the fibrotic cecum. Data are given for each mouse, including mean +/- SD (n = 5 animals per group). Statistical significance was analyzed using the Student t test. *P < 0.05; **P < 0.01; ***P < 0.001; ****P < 0.0001.

Verification of protease, protease inhibitor, and protease-activated receptor (PAR) regulation in ceca by quantitative real-time PCR 21 days post-infection. A, Metalloproteases: Mmp3, Mmp7, Mmp8, Mmp10, and Mmp13 are upregulated, Mepb1 (meprin-β) is downregulated, and Mmp2 expression is unchanged. B, Serine proteases glandular kallikreins (Klk1b5, Klk1b8, Klk1b22) and Tpsg1 (tryptase-γ) are downregulated, and Gzmk (granzyme-K) is upregulated in the fibrotic cecum. C, Cysteine proteases cathepsin C and K (Ctsc and Ctsk) and the aspartic protease cathepsin D (Ctsd) are upregulated in fibrotic cecum. D, Protease inhibitors Serpina3m, Timp1 (tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinase 1), and Stfa1 (stefin A1) are upregulated in the fibrotic cecum. Data are given for each mouse, including mean +/- SD (n = 5 animals per group). Statistical significance was analyzed using the Student t test. *P < 0.05; **P < 0.01; ***P < 0.001; ****P < 0.0001.

Proteases Are Expressed by Epithelial Cells and Infiltrating Cells During Inflammation and Fibrosis

Next, we tested whether the gene expression changes we observed with the microarray and by qPCR can also be observed at the protein level. Antibody staining of tissues from mock-infected and chronically infected mice demonstrate that MMP3 is weakly and MMP8 is strongly expressed in the uninfected cecum epithelium and upregulated upon S. Typhimurium–induced fibrosis in the cecum epithelium and infiltrating cells (Fig. 3). Positive staining for MMP7, MMP10, MMP13, cathepsin D, and granzyme K is not observed in uninfected ceca; however, in infected fibrotic tissue, MMP13 and cathepsin D are found in the inflammatory infiltrate, MMP7 is upregulated in the epithelium, and MMP10 and granzyme K are seen in both the inflammatory infiltrate and the epithelium of fibrotic tissue. Meprin-β is strongly expressed in epithelial cells in uninfected mice. Upon experimental fibrosis, meprin-β is downregulated and is no longer detectable by immunohistochemical staining (Fig. 3), in agreement with the microarray and qPCR data.
FIGURE 3.

Protease expression in intestinal tissue of mice chronically infected with S. Typhimurium. Cecum sections of mice were stained for proteases as indicated. Original magnification 400×; scale bar: 50 µm.

Protease expression in intestinal tissue of mice chronically infected with S. Typhimurium. Cecum sections of mice were stained for proteases as indicated. Original magnification 400×; scale bar: 50 µm. We next tested whether some of the proteases we see regulated in our experimental model of intestinal fibrosis are also regulated in human IBD patients (see Supplementary Tables 3 and 4 for clinical data of human subjects). Tissue sections from noninflamed controls (C) were compared with inflamed fibrotic tissue from CD and UC patients (Fig. 4A). Similar to our mouse model, the epithelium of non-inflamed controls stained positive for MMP3 and MMP8, whereas in addition to the epithelium of CD and UC patients, there were MMP3- and MMP8-positive inflammatory cells in the lamina propria (Fig. 4B). MMP7, MMP10, and granzyme K were not detected in the noninflamed control intestines. However, in UC and CD patients, a subset of crypt epithelial cells stained strongly for MMP7. In addition, epithelial cells and inflammatory cells in IBD tissues were positive for MMP10 and granzyme K. In noninflamed control tissue, a few cells in the lamina propria were positive for cathepsin C, cathepsin D, and cystatin A. In tissues from CD patients, there was a slight increase in cathepsin C–positive cells, and there was a strong increase in cathepsin D– and cystatin A–positive cells in both CD and UC patients. Strong staining for meprin-β and kallikrein 5 was found in the epithelium and lamina propria of all noninflamed controls, but only mild expression was detected in CD or UC patients. In noninflamed colon, we observed strong TIMP1-positive cells, which are presumably enteroendocrine cells, whereas in IBD patients other epithelial cells and some cells in the lamina propria stained positive for TIMP1 as well.
FIGURE 4.

Protease expression in tissues from human IBD patients. Tissue sections were taken from Crohn’s disease (CD) or ulcerative colitis (UC) patients and from non-inflamed controls (C). A, Hematoxylin and eosin and Masson’s Trichrome (MT) staining showing pathological changes during disease and extracellular matrix deposition, respectively. Original magnification 100×; scale bar: 100 µm. B, Protease staining. Original magnification 200×; scale bar: 50 µm.

Protease expression in tissues from human IBD patients. Tissue sections were taken from Crohn’s disease (CD) or ulcerative colitis (UC) patients and from non-inflamed controls (C). A, Hematoxylin and eosin and Masson’s Trichrome (MT) staining showing pathological changes during disease and extracellular matrix deposition, respectively. Original magnification 100×; scale bar: 100 µm. B, Protease staining. Original magnification 200×; scale bar: 50 µm. In summary, the pattern of protease staining in intestinal tissues from UC patients was very similar to that of CD patients but drastically different from that of noninflamed controls. In addition, protease staining observed to be up- or downregulated in inflamed intestinal mouse tissues followed a comparable pattern in human IBD tissues.

Salmonella Induces Proteases in 129SvJ and C57Bl6/J Mice to a Similar Level

Chronic mouse infections with wild-type S. Typhimurium can only be performed in resistant mouse strains such as 129SvJ. However, the majority of knockout mice that would allow investigation into the contribution of specific proteases to fibrosis are generated in a Salmonella-sensitive C57Bl/6J background. Therefore, we infected C57Bl6J mice with the attenuated S. Typhimurium ΔaroA strain, which also induces chronic intestinal inflammation and fibrosis (Fig. 5A). We analyzed the expression kinetics of selected proteases at days 7, 14, and 21 postinfection. As shown in Figure 5B, the MMPs tested were induced to a similar degree compared with 129SvJ mice infected with wild-type Salmonella. Therefore, C57Bl/6J mice and their gene-deficient strains can be used to study the role of specific proteases during intestinal fibrosis.
FIGURE 5.

Kinetics of protease induction in Salmonella-infected C57Bl/6 mice. C57Bl/6 mice were treated with streptomycin and infected 24 hours later with S. Typhimurium ΔaroA. Seven, 14, and 21 days postinfection, mice were killed and their tissues collected. A, Histopathological changes in chronically inflamed ceca (hematoxylin and eosin staining). ECM deposition in the submucosa and mucosa of infected mice was visualized by Masson’s Trichrome (MT) staining. Abbreviations: L, lumen; M, mucosa; SM, submucosa. Scale bar: 100 µm. B, At indicated time points, induction of proteases was assessed by qPCR. Mean values +/- SD are shown (n = 5 animals per group). Statistical significance was analyzed with 1-way ANOVA with Tukey’s post-test. **P < 0.01; ***P < 0.001.

Kinetics of protease induction in Salmonella-infected C57Bl/6 mice. C57Bl/6 mice were treated with streptomycin and infected 24 hours later with S. Typhimurium ΔaroA. Seven, 14, and 21 days postinfection, mice were killed and their tissues collected. A, Histopathological changes in chronically inflamed ceca (hematoxylin and eosin staining). ECM deposition in the submucosa and mucosa of infected mice was visualized by Masson’s Trichrome (MT) staining. Abbreviations: L, lumen; M, mucosa; SM, submucosa. Scale bar: 100 µm. B, At indicated time points, induction of proteases was assessed by qPCR. Mean values +/- SD are shown (n = 5 animals per group). Statistical significance was analyzed with 1-way ANOVA with Tukey’s post-test. **P < 0.01; ***P < 0.001.

Salmonella Induces Protease Expression in Macrophages and Epithelial Cells

We observed upregulation of specific proteases during Salmonella-induced chronic inflammation and fibrosis in mice. Although many cell types can express different proteases during inflammation,[26] the staining pattern in fibrotic mouse and human tissue indicated specific expression patterns by epithelial cells, inflammatory cells, and fibroblasts present in the inflamed intestine. Therefore, we tested whether in vitro Salmonella infection of these cell types directly induces protease expression. Mouse primary BMDMs, fibroblasts (NIH-3T3), and epithelial cells (Mode-K) were infected with S. Typhimurium for up to 3 days. As shown in Figure 6, Salmonella invaded and persisted in all three cell types (Fig. 6A–C). Upon infection, BMDMs strongly upregulated expression of Mmp3, Mmp8, Mmp10, and Mmp13 (Fig. 6D–G) but not Mmp7 (not shown). Salmonella infection also induced expression of Mmp3, Mmp10, and Mmp13 in epithelial cells (Fig. 6H–J), but not Mmp7 or Mmp8. In contrast, infection of fibroblasts did not induce expression of any of the tested proteases (not shown). These data demonstrate that S. Typhimurium infection directly stimulates protease expression in macrophages and epithelial cells, but not in fibroblasts.
FIGURE 6.

Salmonella infection induces protease expression in macrophages and epithelial cells. BMDMs, NIH-3T3 fibroblasts, and Mode-K epithelial cells were infected with S. Typhimurium. At indicated time points, cells were lysed, and intracellular bacterial counts were determined by gentamicin protection assay, demonstrating that all cell types were infected and that Salmonella persisted for at least 3 days inside macrophages (A), epithelial cells (B), and fibroblasts (C). Individual values and the mean +/- SD from 1 representative out of 2 independent experiments are shown (n = 4–5 per group). Statistical significance was analyzed using one-way ANOVA with Tukey’s post-test. ***P < 0.001. RNA was isolated from macrophages (D–G) and epithelial cells (H–K) at the indicated time points postinfection, and protease expression was analyzed by qPCR. Individual values and the mean +/- SD from 1 representative out of 2 independent experiments are shown (n = 4–5 per group). Statistical significance was analyzed using Student’s t-test. **P < 0.01; ***P < 0.001.

Salmonella infection induces protease expression in macrophages and epithelial cells. BMDMs, NIH-3T3 fibroblasts, and Mode-K epithelial cells were infected with S. Typhimurium. At indicated time points, cells were lysed, and intracellular bacterial counts were determined by gentamicin protection assay, demonstrating that all cell types were infected and that Salmonella persisted for at least 3 days inside macrophages (A), epithelial cells (B), and fibroblasts (C). Individual values and the mean +/- SD from 1 representative out of 2 independent experiments are shown (n = 4–5 per group). Statistical significance was analyzed using one-way ANOVA with Tukey’s post-test. ***P < 0.001. RNA was isolated from macrophages (D–G) and epithelial cells (H–K) at the indicated time points postinfection, and protease expression was analyzed by qPCR. Individual values and the mean +/- SD from 1 representative out of 2 independent experiments are shown (n = 4–5 per group). Statistical significance was analyzed using Student’s t-test. **P < 0.01; ***P < 0.001.

DISCUSSION

Proteases and their inhibitors are thought to be key mediators of the intestinal fibrotic process, but their specific roles remain poorly understood. Until recently, there was a paucity of animal models to study intestinal fibrosis. The S. Typhimurium model is now established in the field of intestinal fibrosis as it recapitulates the pathology of human disease including transmural tissue fibrosis, a Th1/Th17 immune response, and the induction of pro-fibrotic genes. Using this model, we discovered that a plethora of proteases and protease inhibitors are regulated during intestinal fibrosis. Site-specific upregulation of several MMPs was observed, and a similar protease expression pattern was validated in human intestinal fibrotic tissue. In addition, we demonstrate that S. Typhimurium is capable of directly inducing expression of several proteases in a cell type–specific manner. During intestinal fibrosis development, it is thought that tissue destruction during chronic inflammation causes an excessive healing response, leading to an imbalance between ECM deposition and ECM turnover by MMPs. Association studies show that single nucleotide polymorphisms in the stromelysin genes Mmp3 and Mmp10 are associated with an increased risk for IBD[26] and that the Mmp3 5A/6A genotype is especially associated with fibro-stenosing complications and fistula formation in CD patients.[27] MMP10 and MMP13 are also described to be upregulated in the intestine of CD and UC patients.[28] In mice chronically infected with Salmonella, we observed upregulation of Mmp3, Mmp10, and Mmp13. At first glance, this may appear counterintuitive as MMPs have been implicated in ECM degradation, but the function of MMPs goes beyond cleavage of matrix molecules. For example, MMP3 and macrophage MMP12 can act intracellularly as transcription factors to induce pro-fibrotic connective tissue growth factor (CTGF) and IFN-α gene transcription, respectively.[29, 30] MMP2, where we did not detect altered expression upon Salmonella infection, cleaves and inactivates CTGF, thereby unmasking VEGF.[31] Thus, fibrosis represents a complex inflammatory environment where the interplay of cytokines and growth factors can be orchestrated by proteases. Although many MMPs are involved in epithelial barrier destruction, TIMP function is generally thought to be critical for epithelial barrier restitution. On the other hand, excessive TIMP expression can also result in fibrosis: TIMP1 is upregulated in inflammatory and fibrotic lesions in patients with Crohn’s disease[32, 33] and in other mouse models of intestinal fibrosis.[34] In agreement with these studies, we found a strong upregulation of Timp1 during Salmonella-triggered fibrosis. Besides inhibiting the action of MMPs, TIMP1 also stimulates cell proliferation and activates neutrophils.[35] Recently, it was shown that TIMP1-deficient mice have less fibrosis and inflammation upon stimulation with DSS.[9] Conversely, treatment of CD myofibroblasts with the anti-inflammatory drug infliximab increases TIMP1 production in a dose-dependent manner, leading to an antifibrotic effect by enhancing cell migration and decreasing collagen production.[36] Meprin-β has various roles and can lead to cytokine induction and inactivation of certain cytokines by cleavage.[37] Meprin-β-deficient mice have increased amounts of pro-inflammatory cytokines and increased inflammation in a DSS colitis model.[38] Our data show that meprin-β is downregulated in the fibrotic intestinal tissue of Salmonella-infected mice and also in IBD patient tissue, consistent with previous reports in patients.[39] Various cells have been shown to be sources for proteases. In CD patients, MMP3 was seen to be produced by fibroblasts and mononuclear cells,[40] and MMP7 was exclusively found in enterocytes adjacent to ulcers.[41] In vitro, we also observed MMP3 upregulation in Salmonella-infected macrophages, and in chronically infected mice, MMP7 is upregulated in enterocytes. In vitro, human intestinal fibroblasts can be a major source of MMPs (MMP1, -2, -3, and -9) when stimulated with IL-21 or TNF-α.[42] However, in our experiments using a mouse fibroblast cell line infected with S. Typhimurium, we did not detect upregulation of Mmp3, Mmp7, Mmp8, Mmp10, or Mmp13. We speculate that in an in vivo setting, bacterial infection would trigger IL-21 and TNF-α production in other cell types, which would then indirectly stimulate fibroblasts to produce proteases. S. Typhimurium infection of BMDM directly triggered upregulation of Mmp3, Mmp8, Mmp10, and Mmp13. Also to consider, many proteases are produced as inactive zymogens and need to be activated (eg, by proteolytic cleavage). Our data showing upregulation of proteases thus do not directly imply that these proteases are present in their active form. Several MMPs have been shown to play a role in Salmonella infection. Mmp2 and Mmp9 are highly upregulated during acute Salmonella infection in mice, and Mmp2/Mmp9-/- mice are resistant to S. Typhimurium–induced colitis.[43] Furthermore, constitutive Mmp9 expression in the intestinal epithelium results in stronger colitis development upon acute infection with S. Typhimurium.[44] In contrast, in our chronic infection experiments, we did not detect significant changes in expression of these MMPs compared with uninfected controls, indicating that these MMPs play a role in acute but not chronic infections. Although the etiology of IBD is still not completely understood, an aberrant response to normal microbial populations, intestinal dysbiosis, and infection with various enteric pathogens such as adherent invasive Escherichia coli, Mycobacterium paratuberculosis, Campylobacter, or Salmonella have been associated with IBD.[45-48] However, whether particular infections cause intestinal fibrosis or whether their presence simply reflects the competitive advantage of these pathogens to expand in the inflamed gut is still under debate.[49-53] To our knowledge, this is the first protease screen performed on bacterial-induced fibrosis in mice and will serve as the basis for future studies into the role of specific proteases in disease development. The S. Typhimurum model is now poised to provide further insight into the molecular mechanisms of bacterial-induced intestinal fibrosis. Genes regulated in the mouse model can be validated in the fibrotic tissue removed from Crohn’s disease patients. In the future, specific inhibition of proteases could be a promising target for treatment of chronic inflammation and fibrosis in IBD.[54] Click here for additional data file. Click here for additional data file. Click here for additional data file. Click here for additional data file.
  54 in total

1.  Clinical epidemiology of inflammatory bowel disease: Incidence, prevalence, and environmental influences.

Authors:  Edward V Loftus
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 22.682

Review 2.  Matrix metalloproteinases as modulators of inflammation and innate immunity.

Authors:  William C Parks; Carole L Wilson; Yolanda S López-Boado
Journal:  Nat Rev Immunol       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 53.106

Review 3.  Matrix metalloproteinases in metabolic syndrome.

Authors:  E Hopps; G Caimi
Journal:  Eur J Intern Med       Date:  2011-10-13       Impact factor: 4.487

4.  Analysis of the degradome with the CLIP-CHIP microarray.

Authors:  Reinhild Kappelhoff; Ulrich Auf dem Keller; Christopher M Overall
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2010

Review 5.  The role of transforming growth factor (TGF)-β in modulating the immune response and fibrogenesis in the gut.

Authors:  Paolo Biancheri; Paolo Giuffrida; Guillermo H Docena; Thomas T MacDonald; Gino Roberto Corazza; Antonio Di Sabatino
Journal:  Cytokine Growth Factor Rev       Date:  2013-11-28       Impact factor: 7.638

6.  Enteric Salmonella or Campylobacter infections and the risk of inflammatory bowel disease.

Authors:  Tine Jess; Jacob Simonsen; Nete Munk Nielsen; Kristian Tore Jørgensen; Peter Bager; Steen Ethelberg; Morten Frisch
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2010-12-29       Impact factor: 23.059

7.  MyD88 signaling promotes both mucosal homeostatic and fibrotic responses during Salmonella-induced colitis.

Authors:  Lisa E Månsson; Marinieve Montero; Maryam Zarepour; Kirk S Bergstrom; Caixia Ma; Tina Huang; Carllin Man; Guntram A Grassl; Bruce A Vallance
Journal:  Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol       Date:  2012-06-07       Impact factor: 4.052

8.  Expression and localisation of matrix metalloproteinases and their natural inhibitors in fistulae of patients with Crohn's disease.

Authors:  T Kirkegaard; A Hansen; E Bruun; J Brynskov
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 23.059

9.  Transforming growth factor beta signalling and matrix metalloproteinases in the mucosa overlying Crohn's disease strictures.

Authors:  A Di Sabatino; C L Jackson; K M Pickard; M Buckley; L Rovedatti; N A B Leakey; L Picariello; P Cazzola; G Monteleone; F Tonelli; G R Corazza; T T MacDonald; S L Pender
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2009-02-06       Impact factor: 23.059

Review 10.  Intestinal fibrosis in IBD--a dynamic, multifactorial process.

Authors:  Florian Rieder; Claudio Fiocchi
Journal:  Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 46.802

View more
  5 in total

1.  Structural and Cellular Insights into the l,d-Transpeptidase YcbB as a Therapeutic Target in Citrobacter rodentium, Salmonella Typhimurium, and Salmonella Typhi Infections.

Authors:  N A Caveney; A Serapio-Palacios; S E Woodward; T Bozorgmehr; G Caballero; M Vuckovic; W Deng; B B Finlay; N C J Strynadka
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2021-01-20       Impact factor: 5.191

Review 2.  Mechanisms for the Invasion and Dissemination of Salmonella.

Authors:  Qiao Li
Journal:  Can J Infect Dis Med Microbiol       Date:  2022-06-09       Impact factor: 2.585

Review 3.  Cross-Talk Between the Intestinal Epithelium and Salmonella Typhimurium.

Authors:  Sandrine Ménard; Sonia Lacroix-Lamandé; Katrin Ehrhardt; Jin Yan; Guntram A Grassl; Agnès Wiedemann
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2022-06-06       Impact factor: 6.064

4.  89Zr-pro-MMP-9 F(ab')2 detects colitis induced intestinal and kidney fibrosis.

Authors:  Nicole Dmochowska; William Tieu; Marianne D Keller; Courtney A Hollis; Melissa A Campaniello; Chris Mavrangelos; Prab Takhar; Patrick A Hughes
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-11-23       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 5.  Intestinal Fibrosis in Inflammatory Bowel Disease and the Prospects of Mesenchymal Stem Cell Therapy.

Authors:  Yifei Wang; Bin Huang; Tao Jin; Dickson Kofi Wiredu Ocansey; Jiajia Jiang; Fei Mao
Journal:  Front Immunol       Date:  2022-03-18       Impact factor: 7.561

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.