| Literature DB >> 31066232 |
Shuai Mao1,2, Shalina Taylor2, Qubo Chen3, Minzhou Zhang1, Aleksander Hinek4.
Abstract
AIMS: The aims of this study were to evaluate the effects of sodium tanshinone IIA sulfonate (STS) on left ventricular (LV) remodelling after for ST-elevated myocardial infarction (STEMI). METHODS ANDEntities:
Keywords: left ventricular remodelling; myocardial infarction; neutrophils-derived granule components; sodium tanshinone IIA sulfonate
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31066232 PMCID: PMC6584480 DOI: 10.1111/jcmm.14306
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Cell Mol Med ISSN: 1582-1838 Impact factor: 5.310
Figure 1Study flow diagram. STS, sodium tanshinone IIA sulfonate
Baseline and procedural characteristics
| STS (n = 50) | Control (n = 51) |
| |
|---|---|---|---|
| Age, y | 68.19 ± 9.67 | 68.63 ± 10.23 | 0.83 |
| Gender (Female) | 24 (48.00) | 26 (50.98) | 0.77 |
| Body mass index | 23.79 ± 2.17 | 23.08 ± 2.78 | 0.16 |
| Heart rate at presentation, beats/min | 77.43 ± 10.39 | 76.26 ± 11.41 | 0.59 |
| Systolic arterial pressure at presentation, mm Hg | 131.75 ± 17.53 | 132.25 ± 17.64 | 0.89 |
| Killip class at presentation | 1.58 ± 0.81 | 1.61 ± 0.72 | 0.86 |
| LVEDVi, mL/m2 | 48.53 ± 6.52 | 47.87 ± 7.85 | 0.65 |
| LVESVi, mL/m2 | 22.41 ± 3.43 | 22.68 ± 4.66 | 0.75 |
| EF, % | 53.17 ± 8.27 | 52.29 ± 7.62 | 0.59 |
| Previous medical history | |||
| Coronary heart disease | 7 (14.00) | 8 (15.69) | 0.81 |
| Hypertension | 26 (52.00) | 28 (54.90) | 0.77 |
| Diabetes mellitus | 20 (40.00) | 19 (37.25) | 0.78 |
| Smoking | 18 (36.00) | 17 (33.33) | 0.78 |
| Peak NT‐proBNP, ng/L | 757.95 ± 91.66 | 776.21 ± 113.55 | 0.90 |
| Peak CK‐MB, IU/L | 155.41 ± 68.19 | 147.84 ± 83.26 | 0.62 |
| Left anterior descending artery | 27 (54.00) | 29 (56.86) | 0.77 |
| Infarct‐related artery TIMI flow grade 0‐1 | 50 (100) | 51 (100) | ‐ |
| Multi‐vessel disease | 14 (28.00) | 13 (25.49) | 0.78 |
| Procedural success | 50 (100) | 51 (100) | ‐ |
| IRA stenting | 50 (100) | 51 (100) | ‐ |
| Number of stents | 1.38 ± 0.60 | 1.41 ± 0.57 | 0.79 |
| Stent length (mm) | 24.24 ± 11.01 | 24.70 ± 9.92 | 0.83 |
| IRA TIMI flow grade 3 after PCI | 50 (100) | 51 (100) | ‐ |
| Ischaemia time (min) | 269.81 ± 198.77 | 288.81 ± 160.69 | 0.93 |
| Medications | |||
| Aspirin | 47 (94.00) | 48 (94.12) | 1.00 |
| clopidogrel | 48 (96) | 49 (96.08) | 1.00 |
| Beta blockers | 38 (76.00) | 36 (70.59) | 0.54 |
| ACE inhibitors/ARB | 32 (64.00) | 34 (66.67) | 0.78 |
| Lipid‐lowering agents | 49 (98.00) | 48 (94.12) | 0.62 |
| Diuretics | 7 (14.00) | 10 (19.61) | 0.45 |
Data are presented as mean ± SD or median.
ACE, angiotensin‐converting enzyme; ARB, angiotensin II receptor blocker; BMI, body mass index; CK‐MB, creatine kinase‐MB; IRA, infarct‐related artery; LAD, left anterior descending artery; LVEDVi, left ventricular end diastolic volume index; LVEF, left ventricular ejection fraction; NT‐proBNP, N‐terminal pro‐brain natriuretic peptide; NYHA, New York Heart Association; PCI, percutaneous coronary intervention; TIMI, thromobolysis in myocardial infarction.
Figure 2Echocardiographic changes from baseline to 6 months in LVEDVi, LVESVi and LVEF in the STS and control groups. Middle hash of the box indicates the median; 25‐75th percentiles are represented by end caps of the box; the whiskers indicate the 10th and 90th percentiles. LVEDVi, left ventricular end‐diastolic volumes index; LVESVi, left ventricular end‐systolic volume index; and LVEF, left ventricular ejection fraction
Figure 3Proteomics and biosystematics analysis. A, Cluster analysis of the differentially expressed cytokines in the plasma compared between the STS patients and the control patients. B, Significant functional annotations of differentially expressed cytokines using GO analysis according to biological process ranked by enrichment score. C, KEGG pathways analysis of the differentially expressed proteins
Figure 4Quantification of neutrophils‐derived granule components. Levels of neutrophils‐derived granule components, including neutrophil elastase, myeloperoxidase, proteinase 3, NGAL, MMP‐8 and MMP‐9 in patients receiving STS or saline control were assessed by ELISA. NGAL, neutrophil gelatinase‐associated lipocalin. MMP, matrix metalloproteinases