Sean N Avedissian1,2, Gwendolyn M Pais1,2, J Nicholas O'Donnell3, Thomas P Lodise3, Jiajun Liu1,2, Walter C Prozialeck4, Medha D Joshi2,5, Peter C Lamar4, Leighton Becher1, Anil Gulati5, William Hope6,7, Marc H Scheetz1,2,4. 1. Department of Pharmacy Practice, Chicago College of Pharmacy, Midwestern University, Downers Grove, IL, USA. 2. Midwestern University Chicago College of Pharmacy Center of Pharmacometric Excellence, Downers Grove, IL, USA. 3. Department of Pharmacy Practice, Albany College of Pharmacy and Health Sciences, Albany, NY, USA. 4. College of Graduate Studies, Midwestern University, Downers Grove, IL, USA. 5. Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Chicago College of Pharmacy, Midwestern University, Downers Grove, IL, USA. 6. Antimicrobial Pharmacodynamics and Therapeutics Laboratory, Department of Molecular and Clinical Pharmacology, Institute of Translational Medicine, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK. 7. Royal Liverpool and Broadgreen University Hospital Trust, Liverpool, UK.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: To identify the pharmacokinetic (PK) and toxicodynamic (TD) relationship for vancomycin-induced kidney injury. METHODS: Male Sprague-Dawley rats received intravenous (iv) vancomycin. Doses ranging from 150 mg/kg/day to 400 mg/kg/day were administered as a single or twice-daily injection over 24 h (total protocol duration). Controls received iv saline. Plasma was sampled with up to eight samples in 24 h per rat. Twenty-four hour urine was collected and assayed for kidney injury molecule 1 (KIM-1), osteopontin and clusterin. Vancomycin in plasma was quantified via LC-MS/MS. PK analyses were conducted using Pmetrics for R. PK exposures during the first 24 h (i.e. AUC0-24h, Cmax 0-24h and Cmin 0-24h) were calculated. PK/TD relationships were assessed with Spearman's rank coefficient (rs) and the best-fit mathematical model. RESULTS: PK/TD data were generated from 45 vancomycin-treated and 5 control rats. A two-compartment model fit the data well (Bayesian: observed versus predicted R2 = 0.97). Exposure-response relationships were found between AUC0-24h versus KIM-1 and osteopontin (R2 = 0.61 and 0.66) and Cmax 0-24h versus KIM-1 and osteopontin (R2 = 0.50 and 0.56) using a four-parameter Hill fit. Conversely, Cmin 0-24h was less predictive of KIM-1 and osteopontin (R2 = 0.46 and 0.53). A vancomycin AUC0-24h of 482.2 corresponded to a 90% of maximal rise in KIM-1. CONCLUSIONS: Vancomycin-induced kidney injury as defined by urinary biomarkers is driven by vancomycin AUC or Cmax rather than Cmin. Further, an identified PK/TD target AUC0-24h of 482.2 mg·h/L may have direct relevance to human outcomes.
OBJECTIVES: To identify the pharmacokinetic (PK) and toxicodynamic (TD) relationship for vancomycin-induced kidney injury. METHODS: Male Sprague-Dawley rats received intravenous (iv) vancomycin. Doses ranging from 150 mg/kg/day to 400 mg/kg/day were administered as a single or twice-daily injection over 24 h (total protocol duration). Controls received iv saline. Plasma was sampled with up to eight samples in 24 h per rat. Twenty-four hour urine was collected and assayed for kidney injury molecule 1 (KIM-1), osteopontin and clusterin. Vancomycin in plasma was quantified via LC-MS/MS. PK analyses were conducted using Pmetrics for R. PK exposures during the first 24 h (i.e. AUC0-24h, Cmax 0-24h and Cmin 0-24h) were calculated. PK/TD relationships were assessed with Spearman's rank coefficient (rs) and the best-fit mathematical model. RESULTS: PK/TD data were generated from 45 vancomycin-treated and 5 control rats. A two-compartment model fit the data well (Bayesian: observed versus predicted R2 = 0.97). Exposure-response relationships were found between AUC0-24h versus KIM-1 and osteopontin (R2 = 0.61 and 0.66) and Cmax 0-24h versus KIM-1 and osteopontin (R2 = 0.50 and 0.56) using a four-parameter Hill fit. Conversely, Cmin 0-24h was less predictive of KIM-1 and osteopontin (R2 = 0.46 and 0.53). A vancomycin AUC0-24h of 482.2 corresponded to a 90% of maximal rise in KIM-1. CONCLUSIONS:Vancomycin-induced kidney injury as defined by urinary biomarkers is driven by vancomycin AUC or Cmax rather than Cmin. Further, an identified PK/TD target AUC0-24h of 482.2 mg·h/L may have direct relevance to human outcomes.
Authors: Michael Rybak; Ben Lomaestro; John C Rotschafer; Robert Moellering; William Craig; Marianne Billeter; Joseph R Dalovisio; Donald P Levine Journal: Am J Health Syst Pharm Date: 2009-01-01 Impact factor: 2.637
Authors: Walter C Prozialeck; Joshua R Edwards; Vishal S Vaidya; Joseph V Bonventre Journal: Toxicol Appl Pharmacol Date: 2009-02-06 Impact factor: 4.219
Authors: Walter C Prozialeck; Joshua R Edwards; Peter C Lamar; Jie Liu; Vishal S Vaidya; Joseph V Bonventre Journal: Toxicol Appl Pharmacol Date: 2009-01-31 Impact factor: 4.219
Authors: Jiajun Liu; Gwendolyn M Pais; Sean N Avedissian; Annette Gilchrist; Andrew Lee; Nathaniel J Rhodes; Alan R Hauser; Marc H Scheetz Journal: Antimicrob Agents Chemother Date: 2020-04-21 Impact factor: 5.191
Authors: Sean N Avedissian; Gwendolyn Pais; Jiajun Liu; J Nicholas O'Donnell; Thomas P Lodise; Michael Neely; Walter C Prozialeck; Peter C Lamar; Leighton Becher; Marc H Scheetz Journal: Antimicrob Agents Chemother Date: 2021-02-17 Impact factor: 5.191
Authors: Medha D Joshi; Gwendolyn M Pais; Jack Chang; Khrystyna Hlukhenka; Sean N Avedissian; Anil Gulati; Walter C Prozialeck; Peter C Lamar; Zhong Zhang; Marc H Scheetz; Brooke Griffin Journal: Antimicrob Agents Chemother Date: 2019-09-23 Impact factor: 5.191
Authors: Amy Legg; Niamh Meagher; Sandra A Johnson; Matthew A Roberts; Alan Cass; Marc H Scheetz; Jane Davies; Jason A Roberts; Joshua S Davis; Steven Y C Tong Journal: Clin Drug Investig Date: 2022-10-10 Impact factor: 3.580
Authors: Ahmed A Mahmoud; Sean N Avedissian; Abbas Al-Qamari; Tiffany Bohling; Michelle Pham; Marc H Scheetz Journal: Clin Pharmacokinet Date: 2020-12 Impact factor: 6.447
Authors: Gwendolyn M Pais; Jiajun Liu; Sanja Zepcan; Sean N Avedissian; Nathaniel J Rhodes; Kevin J Downes; Ganesh S Moorthy; Marc H Scheetz Journal: Pharmacotherapy Date: 2020-05-04 Impact factor: 4.705
Authors: Marc H Scheetz; Gwendolyn M Pais; Thomas P Lodise; Steven Y C Tong; Joshua S Davis; J Nicholas O'Donnell; Jiajun Liu; Michael Neely; Walter C Prozialeck; Peter C Lamar; Nathaniel J Rhodes; Thomas Holland; Sean N Avedissian Journal: Antimicrob Agents Chemother Date: 2021-08-02 Impact factor: 5.191
Authors: Mark E Murphy; Sonya Tang Girdwood; Jennifer L Goldman; Marc H Scheetz; Kevin J Downes Journal: J Antimicrob Chemother Date: 2021-09-15 Impact factor: 5.790