Literature DB >> 31065432

Clinical feasibility of optical coherence micro-elastography for imaging tumor margins in breast-conserving surgery.

Wes M Allen1,2, Ken Y Foo1,2, Renate Zilkens1,3, Kelsey M Kennedy1,2,4, Qi Fang1,2, Lixin Chin1,2, Benjamin F Dessauvagie5,6, Bruce Latham5, Christobel M Saunders3,7,8, Brendan F Kennedy1,2.   

Abstract

It has been demonstrated that optical coherence micro-elastography (OCME) provides additional contrast of tumor compared to optical coherence tomography (OCT) alone. Previous studies, however, have predominantly been performed on mastectomy specimens. Such specimens typically differ substantially in composition and geometry from the more clinically relevant wide-local excision (WLE) specimens excised during breast-conserving surgery. As a result, it remains unclear if the mechanical contrast observed is maintained in WLE specimens. In this manuscript, we begin to address this issue by performing a feasibility study of OCME on 17 freshly excised, intact WLE specimens. In addition, we present two developments required to sustain the progression of OCME towards intraoperative deployment. First, to enable the rapid visualization of en face images required for intraoperative assessment, we describe an automated segmentation algorithm to fuse en face micro-elastograms with OCT images to provide dual contrast images. Secondly, to validate contrast in micro-elastograms, we present a method that enables co-registration of en face images with histology of WLE specimens, sectioned in the orthogonal plane, without any modification to the standard clinical workflow. We present a summary of the observations across the 17 specimens imaged in addition to representative micro-elastograms and OCT images demonstrating contrast in a number of tumor margins, including those involved by invasive ductal carcinoma, mucinous carcinoma, and solid-papillary carcinoma. The results presented here demonstrate the potential of OCME for imaging tumor margins.

Entities:  

Year:  2018        PMID: 31065432      PMCID: PMC6491020          DOI: 10.1364/BOE.9.006331

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biomed Opt Express        ISSN: 2156-7085            Impact factor:   3.732


  40 in total

1.  Correction of coherence gate curvature in high numerical aperture optical coherence imaging.

Authors:  Benedikt W Graf; Steven G Adie; Stephen A Boppart
Journal:  Opt Lett       Date:  2010-09-15       Impact factor: 3.776

Review 2.  Intraoperative assessment of the breast: guidelines and potential pitfalls.

Authors:  Rodolfo Laucirica
Journal:  Arch Pathol Lab Med       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 5.534

3.  Automated segmentation of tissue structures in optical coherence tomography data.

Authors:  Fernando Gasca; Lukas Ramrath; Gereon Huettmann; Achim Schweikard
Journal:  J Biomed Opt       Date:  2009 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.170

4.  Integrated optical coherence tomography and microscopy for ex vivo multiscale evaluation of human breast tissues.

Authors:  Chao Zhou; David W Cohen; Yihong Wang; Hsiang-Chieh Lee; Amy E Mondelblatt; Tsung-Han Tsai; Aaron D Aguirre; James G Fujimoto; James L Connolly
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2010-11-05       Impact factor: 12.701

5.  Fiji: an open-source platform for biological-image analysis.

Authors:  Johannes Schindelin; Ignacio Arganda-Carreras; Erwin Frise; Verena Kaynig; Mark Longair; Tobias Pietzsch; Stephan Preibisch; Curtis Rueden; Stephan Saalfeld; Benjamin Schmid; Jean-Yves Tinevez; Daniel James White; Volker Hartenstein; Kevin Eliceiri; Pavel Tomancak; Albert Cardona
Journal:  Nat Methods       Date:  2012-06-28       Impact factor: 28.547

Review 6.  Intraoperative imprint cytology and frozen section pathology for margin assessment in breast conservation surgery: a systematic review.

Authors:  Karla Esbona; Zhanhai Li; Lee G Wilke
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2012-07-31       Impact factor: 5.344

7.  Predictors of surgical margin status in breast-conserving surgery within a breast screening program.

Authors:  Emil D Kurniawan; Matthew H Wong; Imogen Windle; Allison Rose; Arlene Mou; Malcolm Buchanan; John P Collins; Julie A Miller; Russell L Gruen; G Bruce Mann
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2008-07-10       Impact factor: 5.344

8.  Intraoperative evaluation of breast tumor margins with optical coherence tomography.

Authors:  Freddy T Nguyen; Adam M Zysk; Eric J Chaney; Jan G Kotynek; Uretz J Oliphant; Frank J Bellafiore; Kendrith M Rowland; Patricia A Johnson; Stephen A Boppart
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2009-11-15       Impact factor: 12.701

9.  Reoperation rates after breast conserving surgery for breast cancer among women in England: retrospective study of hospital episode statistics.

Authors:  R Jeevan; D A Cromwell; M Trivella; G Lawrence; O Kearins; J Pereira; C Sheppard; C M Caddy; J H P van der Meulen
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2012-07-12

10.  Positive margins: the challenge continues for breast surgeons.

Authors:  Lisa Jacobs
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2008-03-05       Impact factor: 5.344

View more
  5 in total

1.  Analysis of strain estimation methods in phase-sensitive compression optical coherence elastography.

Authors:  Jiayue Li; Ewelina Pijewska; Qi Fang; Maciej Szkulmowski; Brendan F Kennedy
Journal:  Biomed Opt Express       Date:  2022-03-18       Impact factor: 3.562

2.  Nonlinear Elasticity Assessment with Optical Coherence Elastography for High-Selectivity Differentiation of Breast Cancer Tissues.

Authors:  Ekaterina V Gubarkova; Aleksander A Sovetsky; Lev A Matveev; Aleksander L Matveyev; Dmitry A Vorontsov; Anton A Plekhanov; Sergey S Kuznetsov; Sergey V Gamayunov; Alexey Y Vorontsov; Marina A Sirotkina; Natalia D Gladkova; Vladimir Y Zaitsev
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2022-05-05       Impact factor: 3.748

Review 3.  [Organoids for the advancement of intraoperative diagnostic procedures].

Authors:  N Harland; B Amend; N Lipke; S Y Brucker; F Fend; A Herkommer; H Lensch; O Sawodny; T E Schäffer; K Schenke-Layland; C Tarín Sauer; W Aicher; A Stenzl
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2021-07-13       Impact factor: 0.639

4.  Diagnostic Accuracy of Cross-Polarization OCT and OCT-Elastography for Differentiation of Breast Cancer Subtypes: Comparative Study.

Authors:  Ekaterina V Gubarkova; Elena B Kiseleva; Marina A Sirotkina; Dmitry A Vorontsov; Ksenia A Achkasova; Sergey S Kuznetsov; Konstantin S Yashin; Aleksander L Matveyev; Aleksander A Sovetsky; Lev A Matveev; Anton A Plekhanov; Alexey Y Vorontsov; Vladimir Y Zaitsev; Natalia D Gladkova
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2020-11-24

Review 5.  Enhanced medical diagnosis for dOCTors: a perspective of optical coherence tomography.

Authors:  Rainer Leitgeb; Fabian Placzek; Elisabet Rank; Lisa Krainz; Richard Haindl; Qian Li; Mengyang Liu; Marco Andreana; Angelika Unterhuber; Tilman Schmoll; Wolfgang Drexler
Journal:  J Biomed Opt       Date:  2021-10       Impact factor: 3.758

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.