Literature DB >> 34255127

[Organoids for the advancement of intraoperative diagnostic procedures].

N Harland1, B Amend2, N Lipke2, S Y Brucker3, F Fend4, A Herkommer5, H Lensch6, O Sawodny7, T E Schäffer8, K Schenke-Layland9,10, C Tarín Sauer7, W Aicher2, A Stenzl2.   

Abstract

In the context of cancer surgery, there is always a trade-off between oncological safety and preservation of function. This is especially true in pelvic surgery due to the close relationship to the pelvic floor muscles, blood supply and nerves. Currently, risk models, preoperative imaging, the surgeon's assessment, and the intraoperative frozen section serve as the basis for decision-making. New imaging techniques and standardization in frozen section have significantly improved this in recent years. However, limitations remain due to time delays as well as more difficult correct anatomical assignment in the follow-up. Alternative intraoperative techniques may overcome this limitation in the future. Patient-derived organoids have emerged as an important new research vehicle in recent years. They are based on tumor stem cells that, under special culture conditions, form three-dimensional replicas of the original tissue. This makes them ideally suited for testing individual system therapies but also as a validation technique for new intraoperative diagnostic procedures. The Research Training Group 2543/I, which is funded by the German Research Foundation, is researching the potential of new diagnostic methods in an interdisciplinary team regarding validation in addition to intraoperative frozen sections.
© 2021. Springer Medizin Verlag GmbH, ein Teil von Springer Nature.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Artificial intelligence; Augmented reality; Medical technology; Prostate cancer; Uro-oncological surgery

Year:  2021        PMID: 34255127     DOI: 10.1007/s00120-021-01595-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Urologe A        ISSN: 0340-2592            Impact factor:   0.639


  22 in total

1.  'Mohs surgery of the prostate': the utility of in situ frozen section analysis during robotic prostatectomy.

Authors:  Hugh J Lavery; Guang-Qian Xiao; Fatima Nabizada-Pace; Michael Mikulasovich; Pamela Unger; David B Samadi
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2010-09-29       Impact factor: 5.588

Review 2.  Frozen section evaluation of margins in radical prostatectomy specimens: a contemporary study and literature review.

Authors:  Amberly L Nunez; Giovanna A Giannico; Faisal Mukhtar; Virginia Dailey; Rizk El-Galley; Omar Hameed
Journal:  Ann Diagn Pathol       Date:  2016-08-09       Impact factor: 2.090

3.  Prostatic peripheral nerve distribution may impact the functional outcome of nerve-sparing prostatectomy.

Authors:  B Amend; J Hennenlotter; U Kuehs; I Laible; A Anastasiadis; D Schilling; A Stenzl; K D Sievert
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2011-12-01       Impact factor: 4.226

4.  Defining Clinically Meaningful Positive Surgical Margins in Patients Undergoing Radical Prostatectomy for Localised Prostate Cancer.

Authors:  Alberto Martini; Giorgio Gandaglia; Nicola Fossati; Simone Scuderi; Carlo Andrea Bravi; Elio Mazzone; Armando Stabile; Simone Scarcella; Daniele Robesti; Francesco Barletta; Vito Cucchiara; Vincenzo Mirone; Francesco Montorsi; Alberto Briganti
Journal:  Eur Urol Oncol       Date:  2019-04-04

5.  NeuroSAFE frozen section during robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: peri-operative and histopathological outcomes from the NeuroSAFE PROOF feasibility randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Eoin Dinneen; Aiman Haider; Jack Grierson; Alex Freeman; Jon Oxley; Tim Briggs; Senthil Nathan; Norman R Williams; Chris Brew-Graves; Raj Persad; Jon Aning; Charles Jameson; Marzena Ratynska; Imen Ben-Salha; Rhys Ball; Rosie Clow; Clare Allen; Daniel Heffernan-Ho; John Kelly; Greg Shaw
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2021-03-29       Impact factor: 5.588

6.  Early Postoperative Radiotherapy is Associated with Worse Functional Outcomes in Patients with Prostate Cancer.

Authors:  Emanuele Zaffuto; Giorgio Gandaglia; Nicola Fossati; Paolo Dell'Oglio; Marco Moschini; Vito Cucchiara; Nazareno Suardi; Vincenzo Mirone; Marco Bandini; Shahrokh F Shariat; Pierre I Karakiewicz; Francesco Montorsi; Alberto Briganti
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2016-09-23       Impact factor: 7.450

7.  Accuracy of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging for detecting extracapsular extension in prostate cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Fan Zhang; Chen-Lu Liu; Qian Chen; Sheng-Chao Shao; Shuang-Qing Chen
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2019-10-16       Impact factor: 3.039

8.  Preoperative detection of Vesical Imaging-Reporting and Data System (VI-RADS) score 5 reliably identifies extravesical extension of urothelial carcinoma of the urinary bladder and predicts significant delayed time to cystectomy: time to reconsider the need for primary deep transurethral resection of bladder tumour in cases of locally advanced disease?

Authors:  Francesco Del Giudice; Costantino Leonardo; Giuseppe Simone; Martina Pecoraro; Ettore De Berardinis; Stefano Cipollari; Simone Flammia; Marco Bicchetti; Gian Maria Busetto; Benjamin I Chung; Michele Gallucci; Carlo Catalano; Valeria Panebianco
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2020-08-17       Impact factor: 5.588

9.  Adjuvant or early salvage radiotherapy for the treatment of localised and locally advanced prostate cancer: a prospectively planned systematic review and meta-analysis of aggregate data.

Authors:  Claire L Vale; David Fisher; Andrew Kneebone; Christopher Parker; Maria Pearse; Pierre Richaud; Paul Sargos; Matthew R Sydes; Christopher Brawley; Meryem Brihoum; Chris Brown; Sylvie Chabaud; Adrian Cook; Silvia Forcat; Carol Fraser-Browne; Igor Latorzeff; Mahesh K B Parmar; Jayne F Tierney
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2020-09-28       Impact factor: 79.321

10.  The dramatic COVID 19 outbreak in Italy is responsible of a huge drop of urological surgical activity: a multicenter observational study.

Authors:  Bernardo Rocco; Maria Chiara Sighinolfi; Marco Sandri; Vincenzo Altieri; Michele Amenta; Filippo Annino; Alessandro Antonelli; Raffaele Baio; Riccardo Bertolo; AldoMassimo Bocciardi; Marco Borghesi; Pierluigi Bove; Giorgio Bozzini; Eugenio Brunocilla; Giovanni Cacciamani; Alberto Calori; Angelo Cafarelli; Antonio Celia; Antonio Carbone; Andrea Cocci; Alfio Corsaro; Giovanni Costa; Carlo Ceruti; Luca Cindolo; Simone Crivellaro; Orietta Dalpiaz; Daniele D'Agostino; Bruno Dall'Oglio; Donato Dente; Roberto Falabella; Mario Falsaperla; Giovanni Ferrari; Marinella Finocchiaro; Simone Flammia; Franco Gaboardi; Antonio Galfano; Fabrizio Gallo; Lorenzo Gatti; Francesco Greco; Sada Khorrami; Costantino Leonardo; Carlo Marenghi; Roberto Nucciotti; Marco Oderda; Vincenzo Pagliarulo; Paolo Parma; Antonio L Pastore; Giovannalberto Pini; Angelo Porreca; Luigi Pucci; Maurizio Schenone; Riccardo Schiavina; Carmine Sciorio; Lorenzo Spirito; Alessandro Tafuri; Carlo Terrone; Paolo Umari; Virginia Varca; Domenico Veneziano; Paolo Verze; Alessandro Volpe; Salvatore Micali; Lorenzo Berti; Stefano Zaramella; Luisa Zegna; Elisabetta Bertellini; Andrea Minervini
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2020-10-19       Impact factor: 5.969

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.