| Literature DB >> 31064372 |
Elein Hernandez1, Fiona James2, Stephanie Torrey3, Tina Widowski3, Karen Schwean-Lardner4, Gabrielle Monteith2, Patricia V Turner5.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: There is a critical need to develop appropriate on-farm euthanasia methods for poultry species. Euthanasia methods should affect the brain first causing insensibility, followed by cardiorespiratory arrest. Neck or cervical dislocation methods, either manual (CD) or mechanical (MCD), are reported to cause a prolonged time to loss of sensibility and death with inconsistent results upon application, especially MCD methods. However, there is limited information on cervical dislocation in turkeys. The overall objective of this study was to assess the welfare implications of CD and a newly developed MCD device for euthanasia of cull turkeys in comparison with intravenous (IV) pentobarbital sodium (1 mL/4.5 kg), the gold standard euthanasia method. Time to death using electroencephalographic (EEG) and behavioural responses were monitored in eight and eighteen week-old turkeys for five minutes after each euthanasia method application. Spectral analyses of EEG responses and onset of isoelectric EEGs were compared to baseline EEG recordings of birds under anesthesia and behavioural responses were studied among euthanasia treatments. A significant decrease in brain activity frequencies analysis and isoelectric EEG were recorded as time of brain death.Entities:
Keywords: Animal welfare; Cervical dislocation; EEG; Euthanasia; Poultry; Turkey
Mesh:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31064372 PMCID: PMC6505191 DOI: 10.1186/s12917-019-1885-x
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Vet Res ISSN: 1746-6148 Impact factor: 2.741
Incidence (and percentage) of 8 and 18 w.o. turkeys presenting with various behavioural and physiologic parameters and isoelectric EEG in the 5 min following euthanasia method application
| Parameter | 8 w.o. | 18 w.o. | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pentobarbital sodium ( | CD ( | MCD ( | Pentobarbital sodium ( | MCD ( | |
| Clonic convulsions | 0a (0) | 5b (63) | 11b (92) | 0c (0) | 10d(100) |
| Tonic convulsions | 0a (0) | 7b (88) | 8b (73) | 0 (0) | 6 (67) |
| Feather erection | 4 (67) | 5 (63) | 8 (73) | 5 (100) | 8 (80) |
| Gasping | 0a (0) | 5b (63) | 12b (100) | 0c (0) | 10d (100) |
| Loss of nictitating membrane | 6a (100) | 5a (63) | 2b (17) | 5c (100) | 4d (40) |
| Loss of pupillary light reflex | 6a (100) | 4a (50) | 2b (17) | 5 (100) | 6 (60) |
| Cardiac arrest | 6a (100) | 1b (13) | 1b (8) | −2 | |
| Isoelectric EEG | 6 (100) | 8 (100) | 6 (50) | 4 (100) | 8 (80) |
1One EEG recording was not available for evaluation
2 Data not collected due to sampling limitations
a,b Indicates differences from chance alone within 8 w.o. turkeys for CD or MCD compared to pentobarbital sodium based on 2 × 2 contingency tables
c,d Indicates differences from chance alone within 18 w.o. turkeys for CD or MCD compared to pentobarbital sodium based on 2 × 2 contingency tables
Mean ± SE latency (s) to onset of physiologic and behavioural parameters following euthanasia method application in 8 and 18 w.o. turkeys
| Age (weeks) | Method | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pentobarbital sodium | MCD | CD | Method1 | Age2 | Method x age | |
| Clonic convulsions | ||||||
| 8 | – | 136 ± 19a | 78 ± 31 | 0.09 | 0.0002 | – |
| 18 | – | 11 ± 20b | ||||
| Mean | 73 ± 14 | 78 ± 31 | ||||
| Tonic convulsions | ||||||
| 8 | – | 205 ± 26 | 153 ± 30 | 0.2 | 0.2 | – |
| 18 | – | 150 ± 30 | ||||
| Mean | 178 ± 20 | 153 ± 30 | ||||
| Time to last movement | ||||||
| 8 | 1 ± 1 | 237 ± 22 | 231 ± 27 | < 0.0001 | 0.6 | 0.6 |
| 18 | 1 ± 1 | 204 ± 24 | ||||
| Mean | 1 ± 1c | 220 ± 16d | 231 ± 27d | |||
| Gasping | ||||||
| 8 | – | 4 ± 4 | 4 ± 3 | 0.5 | 0.06 | – |
| 18 | – | 15 ± 5 | ||||
| Mean | 10 ± 3 | 4 ± 3 | ||||
| Feather erection | ||||||
| 8 | 50 ± 43 | 171 ± 30 | 150 ± 35 | 0.003 | 0.4 | 0.4 |
| 18 | 45 ± 43 | 241 ± 43 | ||||
| Mean | 47 ± 30c | 207 ± 26d | 150 ± 35d | |||
| Isoelectric EEG | ||||||
| 8 | 18 ± 36 | 278 ± 36 | 239 ± 31 | < 0.0001 | 0.5 | 0.4 |
| 18 | 26 ± 40 | 218 ± 31 | ||||
| Mean | 22 ± 27 c | 248 ± 24 d | 239 ± 31d | |||
1 The effect of method compares pentobarbital sodium vs. mechanical cervical dislocation (MCD) vs. manual cervical dislocation (CD)
2The effect of age compares the response of pentobarbital sodium and MCD between 8 and 18 w.o. turkeys
a,bIndicates differences observed within column (difference within age)
c,dIndicates differences observed within a row (difference within method)
Mean ± SE duration (s) of behavioural and physiologic responses for each euthanasia method in 8 and 18 w.o. turkeys
| Parameters | Method1 | Analysis | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pentobarbital sodium | CD | MCD | F | ||
| Clonic convulsions | – | 20 ± 17a | 62 ± 10b | 6.8 | 0.003 |
| Tonic convulsions | – | 50 ± 7a | 23 ± 4b | 13.6 | < 0.0001 |
| Motionless | 254 ± 22 | 214 ± 26 | 202 ± 16 | 1.9 | 0.2 |
| Gasping | – | 45 ± 22a | 253 ± 13b | 71.3 | < 0.0001 |
| Feather erection | 38 ± 10 | 48.5 ± 12 | 19 ± 7 | 2.7 | 0.1 |
1The effect of method compares pentobarbital sodium vs. mechanical cervical dislocation (MCD) vs. manual cervical dislocation (CD)
a,b Indicated differences observed within row (difference within method)
Summary effects of euthanasia method on EEG frequency bands in 8 and 18 w.o. turkeys
| Delta (0–4 Hz) | Theta (4–8 Hz) | Alpha (8–13 Hz) | Beta (14-30 Hz) | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Effect |
| Pr > |
| Pr > |
| Pr > |
| Pr > |
| Treatment | 10 | 0.0003 | 118.5 | < 0.0001 | 21.9 | < 0.0001 | 18.2 | < 0.0001 |
| Time | 3.3 | <.0001 | 2.5 | 0.0003 | 6.5 | < 0.0001 | 4.1 | < 0.0001 |
| Treatment x Time | 1.4 | 0.05 | 2.1 | 0.0033 | 1.6 | 0.02 | 1.9 | 0.002 |
Summary effects of euthanasia method on EEG spectral frequencies and Ptot in 8 and 18 w.o. turkeys
| F50 | F95 | PTOT | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Effect |
| Pr > |
| Pr > |
| Pr > |
| Treatment | 35.2 | < 0.0001 | 17.9 | < 0.0001 | 30.2 | < 0.0001 |
| Time | 2.1 | 0.007 | 4.1 | < 0.0001 | 5.6 | < 0.0001 |
| Age x Time | 2 | 0.009 | – | – | – | – |
| Treatment x Time | 2.7 | 0.0004 | 1.2 | 0.2 | 2 | 0.0004 |
| Age x Treatment x Time | 2.3 | 0.002 | – | – | – | – |
Comparison of the mean (±SE) F50 after administration of pentobarbital injection
| F50, Hz | ||
|---|---|---|
| Time(s) | 8 w.o. | 18 w.o. |
| Baseline | 5.1 (1.0) | 4.0 (1.1) |
| 15 | 5.7 (1.0) | 4.9 (1.1) |
| 30 | 7.0 (1.0)* | 9.7 (1.1)* |
| 45 | 6.7 (1.0) | 6.7 (1.1) |
| 60 | 9.7 (1.0) | 7.6 (1.1)* |
| 75 | 9.3 (1.0) | 7.1 (1.1)* |
| 90 | 8 (1.0) | 5.3 (1.1)* |
| 105 | 6 (1.0) | 10.1 (1.1) |
| 120 | 11.3 (1.0) | 7.7 (1.2)* |
| 135 | 5.7 (1.0) | 8.0 (1.1) |
| 150 | 6.3 (1.0) | 10.4 (1.1) |
| 165 | 6.7 (1.0) | 8.3 (1.1) |
| 180 | 6.3 (1.0) | 5.6 (1.1) |
| 195 | 6.3 (1.0) | 8.5 (1.1) |
| 210 | 7.1 (1.1) | 7.0 (1.2) |
| 225 | 6.0 (1.0) | 9.7 (1.4) |
| 240 | 6.0 (1.1) | 7.1 (1.4) |
| 255 | 7.2 (1.2) | 9.0 (1.7) |
| 270 | 7.7 (1.2) | 5.1 (2.4) |
| 285 | 6.2 (1.4) | 5.7 (2.4) |
| 300 | 5.5 (1.5) | 8.5 (2.6) |
Baseline results represent the mean F50 for the 4 s immediately before euthanasia.
* indicate times at which 8 and 18 w.o. means differed between ages at a particular time point (p < 0.05)
Fig. 1EEG analyses following euthanasia application in 8 and 18 w.o. turkeys. Shown are the time course to brain death following administration of pentobarbital sodium IV (a), manual cervical dislocation (b), and mechanical cervical dislocation (c) of mean (±SE) band power (A.1, B.1, C.1) and mean (±SE) Ptot with spectral variables (F50 and F95) (A.2, B.2, C.2) from baseline to 5 min endpoint (300 s). Data are shown as mean (±SE) values for consecutive 15 s intervals after euthanasia application. Baseline values represent the mean of four 15 s intervals immediately preceding euthanasia. Open symbols indicate post-euthanasia time points at which mean differed from baseline within treatment (adjusted p < 0.05). The dotted red line represents time of euthanasia method application and dotted blue line represents onset of isoelectric EEG
Distribution of treatments and sample size for each euthanasia method
| Age (weeks), sex | Weight (kg) | Method | Sample size |
|---|---|---|---|
| 8, female | 2.0 ± 0.5 | Pentobarbital sodium | 6 |
| 8, female | 2.8 ± 0.8 | CD | 8 |
| 8, female | 2.8 ± 0.7 | MCD | 12 |
| 18, male | 19.0 ± 1.3 | Pentobarbital sodium | 5 |
| 18, male | 19.5 ± 1.1 | MCD | 10 |
Description of behavioural and physiologic parameters measured in turkeys using video recordings after euthanasia method application
| Parameter | Description | Measures |
|---|---|---|
| Gasping | Repetitive and rapid opening and closing of the beak (not associated with respiratory function) | Latency Duration |
| Clonic convulsions | Rapid, uncoordinated movement of the body and wings | Latency Duration |
| Tonic convulsions | Slow extension or movement of the legs and wings | Latency Duration |
| Motionless | No body or respiratory movement | Duration |
| Feather erection | Multifocal to generalized rising of feather of the body | Latency Duration |
| Time to last body movement | Time of last wing, leg or body movement or onset of motionless with no further movement | Latency |
| Loss of nictitating membrane | Loss of movement of the third eyelid over the cornea after lightly touched with a fingertip | Latency |
| Loss of pupillary light reflex | Loss of constriction of the pupil after penlight was shone into the eye | Latency |
| Cardiac arrest | Cessation of function of the heart. | Latency |