Literature DB >> 20548061

Using time to insensibility and estimated time of death to evaluate a nonpenetrating captive bolt, cervical dislocation, and blunt trauma for on-farm killing of turkeys.

M A Erasmus1, P Lawlis, I J H Duncan, T M Widowski.   

Abstract

The effectiveness of a pneumatic nonpenetrating captive bolt (Zephyr) was assessed for on-farm euthanasia of turkeys and compared with blunt force trauma, manual cervical dislocation, and mechanical cervical dislocation using a burdizzo. The Zephyr (n = 46) and burdizzo (n = 26) were evaluated in turkey hens (11.4 +/- 0.1 kg), the Zephyr (n = 46) and blunt trauma (n = 32) were evaluated in turkey toms (13.1 +/- 0.2 kg), and the Zephyr (n = 12), blunt trauma (n = 11), and manual cervical dislocation (n = 7) were evaluated in broiler turkeys (4.1 +/- 0.3 kg). The nictitating membrane and pupillary light reflexes were monitored continuously to determine when insensibility occurred. Time of death was estimated based on the end time of convulsions and sustained absence of breathing. The nictitating membrane reflex was present immediately after treatment in all 26 hens killed with a burdizzo versus 8 of 46 hens killed with the Zephyr (P < 0.001). The presence of eye reflexes did not differ between the Zephyr and blunt trauma for toms (1 of 26 toms killed with blunt trauma, 2 of 44 toms killed with the Zephyr, P = 1.0). The nictitating membrane reflex persisted in a greater proportion of broiler turkeys killed with cervical dislocation (7 of 7) versus the Zephyr (0 of 12, P < 0.001) and blunt trauma (2 of 9, P = 0.003) but did not differ between blunt trauma and the Zephyr (P = 0.2). End time of convulsions did not differ between the Zephyr and burdizzo for hens (204 +/- 8 vs. 114 +/- 10 s, P = 0.5) or between the Zephyr and blunt trauma for toms (200 +/- 7 s vs. 218 +/- 11.8 s, P = 0.4) but was shorter after cervical dislocation in broiler turkeys (cervical dislocation: 138 +/- 13 s, Zephyr: 165 +/- 7 s, blunt trauma: 178 +/- 13 s, P < 0.001). Results demonstrated that the Zephyr (discharged twice in immediate succession) and blunt trauma (single hit) were similarly effective at consistently causing immediate insensibility. Conversely, neither method of cervical dislocation caused immediate insensibility. This study may assist in revising current poultry euthanasia recommendations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20548061     DOI: 10.3382/ps.2009-00445

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Poult Sci        ISSN: 0032-5791            Impact factor:   3.352


  16 in total

1.  Evaluation of intravenous T-61 as a euthanasia method for birds.

Authors:  Bethany I Baker-Cook; Antonietta L Moritz; Danielle Zwueste; Karen Schwean-Lardner; Karen L Machin
Journal:  Can Vet J       Date:  2021-04       Impact factor: 1.008

2.  Assessing Animal Welfare Impacts in the Management of European Rabbits (Oryctolagus cuniculus), European Moles (Talpa europaea) and Carrion Crows (Corvus corone).

Authors:  Sandra E Baker; Trudy M Sharp; David W Macdonald
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-01-04       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Investigation Into the Humaneness of Slaughter Methods for Guinea Pigs (Cavia porcelus) in the Andean Region.

Authors:  Georgina Limon; Eloy A Gonzales-Gustavson; Troy J Gibson
Journal:  J Appl Anim Welf Sci       Date:  2016-03-10       Impact factor: 1.440

4.  On Farm Evaluation of a Novel Mechanical Cervical Dislocation Device for Poultry.

Authors:  Jessica E Martin; Victoria Sandilands; Julian Sparrey; Laurence Baker; Dorothy E F McKeegan
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2018-01-10       Impact factor: 2.752

5.  Assessing a Method of Mechanical Cervical Dislocation as a Humane Option for On-Farm Killing Using Anesthetized Poults and Young Turkeys.

Authors:  Caitlin R Woolcott; Stephanie Torrey; Patricia V Turner; Heather Chalmers; Lena J Levison; Karen Schwean-Lardner; Tina M Widowski
Journal:  Front Vet Sci       Date:  2018-11-07

6.  Euthanasia: Manual versus Mechanical Cervical Dislocation for Broilers.

Authors:  Leonie Jacobs; Dianna V Bourassa; Caitlin E Harris; R Jeff Buhr
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2019-02-01       Impact factor: 2.752

7.  Electroencephalographic, physiologic and behavioural responses during cervical dislocation euthanasia in turkeys.

Authors:  Elein Hernandez; Fiona James; Stephanie Torrey; Tina Widowski; Karen Schwean-Lardner; Gabrielle Monteith; Patricia V Turner
Journal:  BMC Vet Res       Date:  2019-05-07       Impact factor: 2.741

8.  Efficacy of Blunt Force Trauma, a Novel Mechanical Cervical Dislocation Device, and a Non-Penetrating Captive Bolt Device for On-Farm Euthanasia of Pre-Weaned Kits, Growers, and Adult Commercial Meat Rabbits.

Authors:  Jessica L Walsh; Aaron Percival; Patricia V Turner
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2017-12-15       Impact factor: 2.752

9.  Welfare Risks of Repeated Application of On-Farm Killing Methods for Poultry.

Authors:  Jessica E Martin; Dale A Sandercock; Victoria Sandilands; Julian Sparrey; Laurence Baker; Nick H C Sparks; Dorothy E F McKeegan
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2018-03-15       Impact factor: 2.752

10.  Evaluation of Two Models of Non-Penetrating Captive Bolt Devices for On-Farm Euthanasia of Turkeys.

Authors:  Caitlin R Woolcott; Stephanie Torrey; Patricia V Turner; Lilia Serpa; Karen Schwean-Lardner; Tina M Widowski
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2018-03-20       Impact factor: 2.752

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.