Literature DB >> 22700499

Mass depopulation of laying hens in whole barns with liquid carbon dioxide: evaluation of welfare impact.

P V Turner1, H Kloeze, A Dam, D Ward, N Leung, E E L Brown, A Whiteman, M E Chiappetta, D B Hunter.   

Abstract

Appropriate emergency disaster preparedness is a key priority for agricultural agencies to allow effective response to serious avian disease outbreaks. There is a need to develop rapid, humane, and safe depopulation techniques for poultry that are widely applicable across a range of farm settings. Whole barn depopulation with carbon dioxide (CO(2)) has been investigated as a humane and efficient means of killing large numbers of birds in the event of a reportable disease outbreak. It has also been considered as a method for depopulating barns containing end-of-lay hens, particularly when there is limited local slaughter and rendering capacity. Determining the best method of humanely killing large flocks of birds remains problematic and is being investigated by a coordinated international effort. While whole barn depopulation using CO(2) inhalation has been explored, physiologic responses of chickens have not been characterized in field settings and assessment of animal welfare is hampered without this information. In this study, 12 cull laying hens were surgically instrumented with telemetry transmitters to record electroencephalographs, electrocardiographs, body temperature, and activity during 2 large-scale field CO(2) euthanasia trials of end-of-lay hens. The day following surgery, instrumented hens were placed in barns with other birds, barns were sealed, and animals were killed by CO(2) inhalation delivered via a specially designed liquid CO(2) manifold. Instrumented birds were monitored by infrared thermography, and ambient temperature, CO(2), and O(2) concentrations were recorded. Results from these studies indicate that instrumented hens lost consciousness within 2 min of CO(2) levels reaching 18 to 20%. Mild to moderate head shaking, gasping, and 1 to 2 clonic muscle contractions were noted in hens before unconsciousness; however, brain death followed rapidly (<5 min). Evaluation of welfare costs and benefits suggest clear advantages over catching and transporting cull hens for slaughter. The financial costs with this method are greater, however, than those estimated for traditional slaughter techniques. Results of these studies are being used to develop national protocols for whole barn depopulation of hens by CO(2) inhalation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22700499     DOI: 10.3382/ps.2012-02139

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Poult Sci        ISSN: 0032-5791            Impact factor:   3.352


  5 in total

1.  Electroencephalographic, physiologic and behavioural responses during cervical dislocation euthanasia in turkeys.

Authors:  Elein Hernandez; Fiona James; Stephanie Torrey; Tina Widowski; Karen Schwean-Lardner; Gabrielle Monteith; Patricia V Turner
Journal:  BMC Vet Res       Date:  2019-05-07       Impact factor: 2.741

2.  Evaluation of Two Models of Non-Penetrating Captive Bolt Devices for On-Farm Euthanasia of Turkeys.

Authors:  Caitlin R Woolcott; Stephanie Torrey; Patricia V Turner; Lilia Serpa; Karen Schwean-Lardner; Tina M Widowski
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2018-03-20       Impact factor: 2.752

3.  Evaluation of Two Compressed Air Foam Systems for Culling Caged Layer Hens.

Authors:  Eric R Benson; Jaclyn A Weiher; Robert L Alphin; Morgan Farnell; Daniel P Hougentogler
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2018-04-24       Impact factor: 2.752

4.  Defining characteristics of immersion carbon dioxide gas for successful euthanasia of neonatal and young broilers.

Authors:  B I Baker; S Torrey; T M Widowski; P V Turner; T D Knezacek; J Nicholds; T G Crowe; K Schwean-Lardner
Journal:  Poult Sci       Date:  2020-06-26       Impact factor: 3.352

5.  Deciphering the Forebrain Disorder in a Chicken Model of Cerebral Hernia.

Authors:  Yingfeng Tao; Xiaoliu Zhou; Xinting Zheng; Shijun Li; Chunyan Mou
Journal:  Genes (Basel)       Date:  2020-08-27       Impact factor: 4.096

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.