Literature DB >> 31062209

Psychosocial Functioning in Women with Early Breast Cancer Treated with Breast Surgery With or Without Immediate Breast Reconstruction.

Helene Retrouvey1, Isabel Kerrebijn2, Kelly A Metcalfe3, Anne C O'Neill1, David R McCready4, Stefan O P Hofer1, Toni Zhong5.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To compare psychosocial function outcomes in early breast cancer patients treated with breast-conserving surgery (BCS), mastectomy alone (MA), and mastectomy with immediate breast reconstruction (IBR) at 1 year after surgery.
METHODS: Early-stage (stage 0-2) breast cancer patients treated with BCS, MA, and IBR at the University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada between May 1 2015 and July 31 2016 were prospectively enrolled. Their changes in psychosocial functioning from baseline to 12 months following surgery were compared by using the BREAST-Q, Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, and Impact of Event Scale with ANOVA and linear regression.
RESULTS: There were 303 early-stage breast cancer patients: 155 underwent BCS, 78 MA, and 70 IBR. After multivariable regression accounting for age, baseline score, income, education, receipt of chemoradiation or hormonal therapy, ethnicity, cancer stage, and unilateral versus bilateral surgery, breast satisfaction was highest in BCS (72.1, SD 19.6), followed by IBR (60.0, SD 18.0), and MA (49.9, SD 78.0) at 12 months, p < 0.001. Immediate breast reconstruction had similar psychosocial well-being (69.9, SD 20.6) compared with BCS (78.5, SD 20.6), p = 0.07. Sexual and chest physical well-being were similar between IBR, BCS, and MA, p > 0.05.
CONCLUSIONS: Our study found that in a multidisciplinary breast cancer centre where all three breast ablative and reconstruction options are available to early breast cancer patients, either BCS or IBR can be used to provide patients with a higher degree of satisfaction and psychosocial well-being compared with MA in the long-term.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31062209     DOI: 10.1245/s10434-019-07251-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol        ISSN: 1068-9265            Impact factor:   5.344


  6 in total

1.  The effect and prognosis of combinative implantation by autologous-fat granule and prosthesis for breast reconstruction after radical mastectomy.

Authors:  Shensong Liu; Shaoshan Chen; Yongcheng Yang; Weiwei Guan
Journal:  Am J Transl Res       Date:  2021-05-15       Impact factor: 4.060

2.  Patient-reported outcomes among women with unilateral breast cancer undergoing breast conservation versus single or double mastectomy.

Authors:  Catherine Pesce; Jennifer Jaffe; Kristine Kuchta; Katharine Yao; Mark Sisco
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2020-10-08       Impact factor: 4.872

3.  A Single-Center Retrospective Analysis of Local and Distant Relapse of Breast Cancer Following Immediate Breast Reconstruction According to Molecular Subtypes.

Authors:  Chunyong Han; Xuehui Zhang; Jingyan Sun; Jing Liu; Shanshan He; Jian Yin
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2022-06-02       Impact factor: 5.738

4.  Is Tissue Expansion Worth It? Comparative Outcomes of Skin-preserving versus Delayed Autologous Breast Reconstruction.

Authors:  Brett T Phillips; Genevieve Mercier-Couture; Amy S Xue; Carrie K Chu; Mark V Schaverien; Jun Liu; Patrick B Garvey; Donald P Baumann; Charles E Butler; Rene D Largo
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2020-11-24

5.  Risk Factors Associated With Complications After Unilateral Immediate Breast Reconstruction: A French Prospective Multicenter Study.

Authors:  Jacques Dauplat; Emilie Thivat; Philippe Rouanet; Emmanuel Delay; Krishna Clough; Jean-Luc Verhaeghe; Ines Raoust; Marie Bannier; Perig Lemasurier; Christophe Pomel
Journal:  In Vivo       Date:  2021 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 2.155

6.  Unveiling beauty: Insight into being tattooed postmastectomy.

Authors:  Victoria Reid-de Jong
Journal:  Nurs Forum       Date:  2022-02-26
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.