Literature DB >> 34150116

The effect and prognosis of combinative implantation by autologous-fat granule and prosthesis for breast reconstruction after radical mastectomy.

Shensong Liu1, Shaoshan Chen2, Yongcheng Yang1, Weiwei Guan2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: In this study, we analyzed the effect and prognosis of combinative implantation of autologous-fat granule and prosthesis for breast reconstruction after radical mastectomy.
METHODS: 73 cases of breast cancer patients hospitalized from March 2015 to March 2017 were chosen and separated into observation group (n=41) and control group (n=32) on the basis of the surgical methods. Both the two groups underwent modified radical mastectomy. In addition, the control group received prosthesis implantation for breast reconstruction, and the observation group was implanted with combination of prosthesis and autologous-fat granule transplantation. Thereafter, the surgical indexes, postoperative complications, aesthetic effects of breast reconstruction and prognosis of the two groups of patients were evaluated.
RESULTS: The surgical duration of the observation group was obviously longer than that of the control group (P<0.05), while the two groups had insignificant difference in postoperative drainage duration and postoperative hospital stay (P>0.05). FACT-B score of both groups of patients one year after surgery was dramatically higher than that before surgery (P<0.05), and patients in observation group had remarkably higher scores than those in control group (P<0.05). The incidence of postoperative complications in observation group was substantially lower than that in control group (P<0.05). In addition, the aesthetic evaluation of the observation-group patients postoperatively was notably higher than that in control group (P<0.05), and there was no statistically significant difference in progression-free survival between the two groups (P>0.05).
CONCLUSION: The combinative implantation of both prosthesis and autologous-fat granule for breast reconstruction after radical mastectomy is simple in operation procedure, and has better aesthetic outcome and safety. It satisfies the aesthetic demand of patients while having lesions resection, and does not affect the surgical effect of modified radical mastectomy, which is worthy of clinical promotion. AJTR
Copyright © 2021.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Autologous-fat granule; breast cancer; breast reconstruction; implantation of prosthesis; radical surgery

Year:  2021        PMID: 34150116      PMCID: PMC8205830     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Transl Res        ISSN: 1943-8141            Impact factor:   4.060


  26 in total

1.  Reconstruction in the Setting of Metastatic Breast Cancer: A Challenging Clinical Question.

Authors:  Jessica Maxwell
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2018-08-07       Impact factor: 5.344

Review 2.  Breast Reconstruction Following Breast Cancer Treatment-2018.

Authors:  Gordon K Lee; Clifford C Sheckter
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2018-09-25       Impact factor: 56.272

3.  Association Between Breast Reconstruction Surgery and Quality of Life in Iranian Breast Cancer Patients.

Authors:  Farnaz Sinaei; Kazem Zendehdel; Mahsa Adili; Atefeh Ardestani; Ali Montazeri; Mohammad Ali Mohagheghi
Journal:  Acta Med Iran       Date:  2017-01

4.  The Effect of the Breast Cancer Provider Discussion Law on Breast Reconstruction Rates in New York State.

Authors:  Rose H Fu; Onur Baser; Lu Li; Paul Kurlansky; Jessica Means; Christine H Rohde
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2019-09       Impact factor: 4.730

Review 5.  Breast Reconstruction: A Century of Controversies and Progress.

Authors:  Antoine Homsy; Eva Rüegg; Denys Montandon; Georges Vlastos; Ali Modarressi; Brigitte Pittet
Journal:  Ann Plast Surg       Date:  2018-04       Impact factor: 1.539

6.  Safety of adipose-derived cell (stromal vascular fraction - SVF) augmentation for surgical breast reconstruction in cancer patients.

Authors:  Sławomir Mazur; Aleksandra Zołocińska; Katarzyna Siennicka; Karolina Janik-Kosacka; Anna Chrapusta; Zygmunt Pojda
Journal:  Adv Clin Exp Med       Date:  2018-08       Impact factor: 1.727

7.  [Current situation of breast reconstruction after breast cancer in Reunion Island].

Authors:  C Lembrouck; G Nicolet; A Nguyen; C Tunon de Lara
Journal:  Gynecol Obstet Fertil Senol       Date:  2018-12-06

8.  Psychosocial Functioning in Women with Early Breast Cancer Treated with Breast Surgery With or Without Immediate Breast Reconstruction.

Authors:  Helene Retrouvey; Isabel Kerrebijn; Kelly A Metcalfe; Anne C O'Neill; David R McCready; Stefan O P Hofer; Toni Zhong
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2019-05-06       Impact factor: 5.344

9.  The association between complications and quality of life after mastectomy and breast reconstruction for breast cancer.

Authors:  John P Browne; Ranjeet Jeevan; Carmel Gulliver-Clarke; Jerome Pereira; Christopher M Caddy; Jan H P van der Meulen
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2017-05-17       Impact factor: 6.860

10.  The Influence of Patient Exposure to Breast Reconstruction Approaches and Education on Patient Choices in Breast Cancer Treatment.

Authors:  Marek K Dobke; Brittany Yee; Gina A Mackert; William Y Zhu; Sarah L Blair
Journal:  Ann Plast Surg       Date:  2019-08       Impact factor: 1.539

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.