Literature DB >> 31059978

The influence of joint attention and partner trustworthiness on cross-modal sensory cueing.

Maartje C de Jong1, H Chris Dijkerman2.   

Abstract

Joint attention refers to the coordinated attention between social partners to an object of shared interest, usually involving shared gaze toward the object. In the laboratory, however, joint attention is often investigated using computerized gaze cueing tasks that do not allow shared gaze. Instead, these computerized tasks require the participant to maintain fixation on the virtual partner's face, while the partner gazes to the left or right. Here we designed a modified gaze cueing task that better simulates a natural joint attention episode by allowing shared gaze, while still maintaining tight experimental control. In our computerized task the participant's gaze and the gaze of a virtual partner were manipulated independently, resulting in shared or unshared gaze. Following each gaze shift of the virtual partner a touch stimulus was delivered on one of the cheeks of the participant. We analyzed behavioral and neural (electro-encephalography) responses to the touch. Faster reaction-times and stronger lateralization of alpha power were observed when the touched cheek was in a jointly attended hemispace compared with a singly attended or unattended hemispace. Importantly, these effects were unique to joint attention and could not be explained as the additive effects of own gaze and gaze cue direction. Underlining its social nature, we found that the behavioral effect was absent when we repeated our experiment with nonsocial cues (arrows) instead of gaze cues. Furthermore, when we compared trustworthy with untrustworthy virtual partners (trustworthiness judgements based on facial appearance) we found the effect only for trustworthy and not for untrustworthy virtual partners. We conclude that joint attention based on shared gaze influences attentional orienting such that cross-modal sensory processing at the jointly attended location is facilitated, particularly when the partner is trustworthy. This indicates that social interactions and trustworthiness judgements affect cortical and behavioral responses to sensory information.
Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Alpha oscillations; Gaze following; Joint attention; Trustworthiness; Visuo-tactile cueing

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31059978      PMCID: PMC7611768          DOI: 10.1016/j.cortex.2019.04.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cortex        ISSN: 0010-9452            Impact factor:   4.644


  48 in total

1.  Spatial interference between gaze direction and gaze location: a study on the eye contact effect.

Authors:  Elena Cañadas; Juan Lupiáñez
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol (Hove)       Date:  2012-04-25       Impact factor: 2.143

2.  Toward a second-person neuroscience.

Authors:  Leonhard Schilbach; Bert Timmermans; Vasudevi Reddy; Alan Costall; Gary Bente; Tobias Schlicht; Kai Vogeley
Journal:  Behav Brain Sci       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 12.579

3.  Visuospatial attention shifts by gaze and arrow cues: an ERP study.

Authors:  Jari K Hietanen; Jukka M Leppänen; Lauri Nummenmaa; Piia Astikainen
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2008-04-13       Impact factor: 3.252

Review 4.  The relationship between spatial attention and saccades in the frontoparietal network of the monkey.

Authors:  Claire Wardak; Etienne Olivier; Jean-René Duhamel
Journal:  Eur J Neurosci       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 3.386

Review 5.  Infant joint attention, neural networks and social cognition.

Authors:  Peter Mundy; William Jarrold
Journal:  Neural Netw       Date:  2010-09-15

Review 6.  The neural basis of visual attention.

Authors:  James W Bisley
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2010-08-31       Impact factor: 5.182

7.  Early social attention impairments in autism: social orienting, joint attention, and attention to distress.

Authors:  Geraldine Dawson; Karen Toth; Robert Abbott; Julie Osterling; Jeff Munson; Annette Estes; Jane Liaw
Journal:  Dev Psychol       Date:  2004-03

8.  On being the object of attention: implications for self-other consciousness.

Authors:  Vasudevi Reddy
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 20.229

9.  The late positive potential indexes a role for emotion during learning of trust from eye-gaze cues.

Authors:  Luis R Manssuer; Mark V Roberts; Steven P Tipper
Journal:  Soc Neurosci       Date:  2015-03-03       Impact factor: 2.083

10.  Factor structure, reliability and criterion validity of the Autism-Spectrum Quotient (AQ): a study in Dutch population and patient groups.

Authors:  Rosa A Hoekstra; Meike Bartels; Danielle C Cath; Dorret I Boomsma
Journal:  J Autism Dev Disord       Date:  2008-02-27
View more
  3 in total

1.  Body-Space Interactions: Same Spatial Encoding but Different Influence of Valence for Reaching and Defensive Purposes.

Authors:  Chiara Spaccasassi; H Chris Dijkerman; Angelo Maravita; Oscar Ferrante; Maartje C de Jong
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2021-09-01       Impact factor: 3.420

Review 2.  Coordinating attention requires coordinated senses.

Authors:  Lucas Battich; Merle Fairhurst; Ophelia Deroy
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2020-12

3.  The impact of joint attention on the sound-induced flash illusions.

Authors:  Lucas Battich; Isabelle Garzorz; Basil Wahn; Ophelia Deroy
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2021-09-24       Impact factor: 2.199

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.