Literature DB >> 34424990

Body-Space Interactions: Same Spatial Encoding but Different Influence of Valence for Reaching and Defensive Purposes.

Chiara Spaccasassi1, H Chris Dijkerman2, Angelo Maravita3, Oscar Ferrante4, Maartje C de Jong2,5,6,7.   

Abstract

The space around our body, the so-called peripersonal space, is where interactions with nearby objects may occur. "Defensive space" and "Reaching space", respectively, refer to two opposite poles of interaction between our body and the external environment: protecting the body and performing a goal-directed action. Here, we hypothesized that mechanisms underlying these two action spaces are differentially modulated by the valence of visual stimuli, as stimuli with negative valence are more likely to activate protective actions whereas stimuli with positive valence may activate approaching actions. To test whether such distinction in cognitive/evaluative processing exists between Reaching and Defensive spaces, we measured behavioral responses as well as neural activations over sensorimotor cortex using EEG while participants performed several tasks designed to tap into mechanisms underlying either Defensive (e.g., respond to touch) or Reaching space (e.g., estimate whether object is within reaching distance). During each task, pictures of objects with either positive or negative valence were presented at different distances from the participants' body. We found that Defensive space was smaller for positively compared with negatively valenced visual stimuli. Furthermore, sensorimotor cortex activation (reflected in modulation of beta power) during tactile processing was enhanced when coupled with negatively rather than positively valenced visual stimuli regarding Defensive space. On the contrary, both the EEG and behavioral measures capturing the mechanisms underlying Reaching space did not reveal any modulation by valence. Thus, although valence encoding had differential effects on Reaching and Defensive spaces, the distance of the visual stimulus modulated behavioral measures as well as activity over sensorimotor cortex (reflected in modulations of mu power) in a similar way for both types of spaces. Our results are compatible with the idea that Reaching and Defensive spaces involve the same distance-dependent neural representations of sensory input, whereas task goals and stimulus valence (i.e., contextual information) are implemented at a later processing stage and exert an influence on motor output rather than sensory/space encoding.
© 2021 Massachusetts Institute of Technology.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34424990      PMCID: PMC7611769          DOI: 10.1162/jocn_a_01749

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci        ISSN: 0898-929X            Impact factor:   3.420


  93 in total

1.  Human movement-related potentials vs desynchronization of EEG alpha rhythm: a high-resolution EEG study.

Authors:  C Babiloni; F Carducci; F Cincotti; P M Rossini; C Neuper; G Pfurtscheller; F Babiloni
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 6.556

2.  The facilitated processing of threatening faces: an ERP analysis.

Authors:  Harald T Schupp; Arne Ohman; Markus Junghöfer; Almut I Weike; Jessica Stockburger; Alfons O Hamm
Journal:  Emotion       Date:  2004-06

3.  Seeing touch and pain in a stranger modulates the cortical responses elicited by somatosensory but not auditory stimulation.

Authors:  Elia Valentini; Meng Liang; Salvatore Maria Aglioti; Gian Domenico Iannetti
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2012-01-10       Impact factor: 5.038

4.  Statistical power analyses using G*Power 3.1: tests for correlation and regression analyses.

Authors:  Franz Faul; Edgar Erdfelder; Axel Buchner; Albert-Georg Lang
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2009-11

5.  The space around us.

Authors:  G Rizzolatti; L Fadiga; L Fogassi; V Gallese
Journal:  Science       Date:  1997-07-11       Impact factor: 47.728

6.  Functional features of nociceptive-induced suppression of alpha band electroencephalographic oscillations.

Authors:  Li Hu; Weiwei Peng; Elia Valentini; Zhiguo Zhang; Yong Hu
Journal:  J Pain       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 5.820

7.  Patterns of cortical activation during planning of voluntary movement.

Authors:  G Pfurtscheller; A Berghold
Journal:  Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  1989-03

8.  Spatiotemporal Dynamics of the Cortical Responses Induced by a Prolonged Tactile Stimulation of the Human Fingertips.

Authors:  Clara Genna; Calogero M Oddo; Chiara Fanciullacci; Carmelo Chisari; Henrik Jörntell; Fiorenzo Artoni; Silvestro Micera
Journal:  Brain Topogr       Date:  2017-05-11       Impact factor: 3.020

Review 9.  Peripersonal space in the brain.

Authors:  Giuseppe di Pellegrino; Elisabetta Làdavas
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2014-11-13       Impact factor: 3.139

10.  Body part-centered and full body-centered peripersonal space representations.

Authors:  Andrea Serino; Jean-Paul Noel; Giulia Galli; Elisa Canzoneri; Patrick Marmaroli; Hervé Lissek; Olaf Blanke
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2015-12-22       Impact factor: 4.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.