Literature DB >> 18485332

Visuospatial attention shifts by gaze and arrow cues: an ERP study.

Jari K Hietanen1, Jukka M Leppänen, Lauri Nummenmaa, Piia Astikainen.   

Abstract

Orienting of visual attention can be automatically triggered not only by illumination changes occurring in the visual periphery but also by centrally presented gaze and arrow cues. We investigated whether the automatic shifts of visuospatial attention triggered by centrally displayed gaze and arrow cues rely on the same neural systems. To this end we measured event-related potentials (ERPs) time-locked to the cue and target onsets while the participants (n=17) performed a spatial cuing task. In the task, the participants detected and responded to laterally presented targets preceded by centrally presented, non-predictive, gaze or arrow cues. Manual reaction times and target-triggered ERP data showed that both gaze and arrow cues automatically oriented attention and facilitated subsequent processing of target stimuli. However, the cue-triggered electrophysiological data indicated that the ERPs elicited by the gaze and arrow cues were different at lateral parietal and fronto-central electrode sites. Most notably, for the arrows, we found a typical early attention direction negativity (EDAN) effect occurring 220-260 ms after the cue onset. The ERPs were shifted in the negative direction when the arrows pointed to a direction which was contralateral to the recorded hemisphere as compared to arrows with ipsilateral direction. This effect was not observed for the gaze stimuli. These results provide further support for earlier behavioral and neuroimaging studies indicating that automatic orienting of attention by arrow cues and gaze cues are based on different neural mechanisms.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18485332     DOI: 10.1016/j.brainres.2008.03.091

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Brain Res        ISSN: 0006-8993            Impact factor:   3.252


  29 in total

1.  Sex-Linked Mating Strategies Diverge with a Manipulation of Genital Salience.

Authors:  Adam K Fetterman; Nicole N Kruger; Michael D Robinson
Journal:  Motiv Emot       Date:  2015-02

2.  Mirroring of attention by neurons in macaque parietal cortex.

Authors:  Stephen V Shepherd; Jeffrey T Klein; Robert O Deaner; Michael L Platt
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2009-05-22       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Fearful, surprised, happy, and angry facial expressions modulate gaze-oriented attention: behavioral and ERP evidence.

Authors:  Amandine Lassalle; Roxane J Itier
Journal:  Soc Neurosci       Date:  2013-09-18       Impact factor: 2.083

4.  Reflexive orienting in response to short- and long-duration gaze cues in young, young-old, and old-old adults.

Authors:  Nora D Gayzur; Linda K Langley; Chris Kelland; Sara V Wyman; Alyson L Saville; Annie T Ciernia; Ganesh Padmanabhan
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 2.199

5.  Mapping reflexive shifts of attention in eye-centered and hand-centered coordinate systems.

Authors:  Valentina Cazzato; Emiliano Macaluso; Filippo Crostella; Salvatore Maria Aglioti
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2011-03-09       Impact factor: 5.038

Review 6.  Visual attention and action: How cueing, direct mapping, and social interactions drive orienting.

Authors:  Mark A Atkinson; Andrew A Simpson; Geoff G Cole
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2018-10

7.  Face stimulus eliminates antisaccade-cost: gaze following is a different kind of arrow.

Authors:  Liran Zeligman; Ari Z Zivotofsky
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2018-02-08       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  Deficient cortical face-sensitive N170 responses and basic visual processing in schizophrenia.

Authors:  S Maher; Y Mashhoon; T Ekstrom; S Lukas; Y Chen
Journal:  Schizophr Res       Date:  2015-12-12       Impact factor: 4.939

9.  Differential activation of frontoparietal attention networks by social and symbolic spatial cues.

Authors:  Andrew D Engell; Lauri Nummenmaa; Nikolaas N Oosterhof; Richard N Henson; James V Haxby; Andrew J Calder
Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci       Date:  2010-03-19       Impact factor: 3.436

Review 10.  Neural bases of eye and gaze processing: the core of social cognition.

Authors:  Roxane J Itier; Magali Batty
Journal:  Neurosci Biobehav Rev       Date:  2009-02-24       Impact factor: 8.989

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.