Literature DB >> 31059421

Perceptual Limits of Optical See-Through Visors for Augmented Reality Guidance of Manual Tasks.

Sara Condino, Marina Carbone, Roberta Piazza, Mauro Ferrari, Vincenzo Ferrari.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The focal length of available optical see-through (OST) head-mounted displays (HMDs) is at least 2 m; therefore, during manual tasks, the user eye cannot keep in focus both the virtual and real content at the same time. Another perceptual limitation is related to the vergence-accommodation conflict, the latter being present in binocular vision only. This paper investigates the effect of incorrect focus cues on the user performance, visual comfort, and workload during the execution of augmented reality (AR)-guided manual task with one of the most advanced OST HMD, the Microsoft HoloLens.
METHODS: An experimental study was designed to investigate the performance of 20 subjects in a connect-the-dots task, with and without the use of AR. The following tests were planned: AR-guided monocular and binocular, and naked-eye monocular and binocular. Each trial was analyzed to evaluate the accuracy in connecting dots. NASA Task Load Index and Likert questionnaires were used to assess the workload and the visual comfort.
RESULTS: No statistically significant differences were found in the workload, and in the perceived comfort between the AR-guided binocular and monocular test. User performances were significantly better during the naked eye tests. No statistically significant differences in performances were found in the monocular and binocular tests. The maximum error in AR tests was 5.9 mm.
CONCLUSION: Even if there is a growing interest in using commercial OST HMD, for guiding high-precision manual tasks, attention should be paid to the limitations of the available technology not designed for the peripersonal space.

Year:  2019        PMID: 31059421     DOI: 10.1109/TBME.2019.2914517

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng        ISSN: 0018-9294            Impact factor:   4.538


  18 in total

1.  Multicenter assessment of augmented reality registration methods for image-guided interventions.

Authors:  Ningcheng Li; Jonathan Wakim; Yilun Koethe; Timothy Huber; Ryan Schenning; Terence P Gade; Stephen J Hunt; Brian J Park
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2022-06-23       Impact factor: 6.313

2.  Development of a Head-Mounted Holographic Needle Guidance System for Enhanced Ultrasound-Guided Neuraxial Anesthesia: System Development and Observational Evaluation.

Authors:  Jaya Tanwani; Fahad Alam; Clyde Matava; Stephen Choi; Paul McHardy; Oskar Singer; Geraldine Cheong; Julian Wiegelmann
Journal:  JMIR Form Res       Date:  2022-06-23

3.  Evaluation Challenges for the Application of Extended Reality Devices in Medicine.

Authors:  Ryan Beams; Ellenor Brown; Wei-Chung Cheng; Janell S Joyner; Andrea S Kim; Kimberly Kontson; Dimitri Amiras; Tassilo Baeuerle; Walter Greenleaf; Rafael J Grossmann; Atul Gupta; Christoffer Hamilton; Hong Hua; Tran Tu Huynh; Christoph Leuze; Sarah B Murthi; John Penczek; Jennifer Silva; Brennan Spiegel; Amitabh Varshney; Aldo Badano
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2022-04-25       Impact factor: 4.903

Review 4.  Measurement Challenges for Medical Image Display Devices.

Authors:  J Penczek; P A Boynton; R Beams; R D Sriram
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2021-04-12       Impact factor: 4.056

Review 5.  Registration Techniques for Clinical Applications of Three-Dimensional Augmented Reality Devices.

Authors:  Christopher M Andrews; Alexander B Henry; Ignacio M Soriano; Michael K Southworth; Jonathan R Silva
Journal:  IEEE J Transl Eng Health Med       Date:  2020-12-17       Impact factor: 3.316

6.  Augmented reality in the operating room: a clinical feasibility study.

Authors:  Cyrill Dennler; David E Bauer; Anne-Gita Scheibler; José Spirig; Tobias Götschi; Philipp Fürnstahl; Mazda Farshad
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2021-05-18       Impact factor: 2.362

7.  Smartphone- versus smartglasses-based augmented reality (AR) for percutaneous needle interventions: system accuracy and feasibility study.

Authors:  Ming Li; Reza Seifabadi; Dilara Long; Quirina De Ruiter; Nicole Varble; Rachel Hecht; Ayele H Negussie; Venkatesh Krishnasamy; Sheng Xu; Bradford J Wood
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2020-07-30       Impact factor: 2.924

8.  Evaluation of an augmented reality platform for austere surgical telementoring: a randomized controlled crossover study in cricothyroidotomies.

Authors:  Edgar Rojas-Muñoz; Chengyuan Lin; Natalia Sanchez-Tamayo; Maria Eugenia Cabrera; Daniel Andersen; Voicu Popescu; Juan Antonio Barragan; Ben Zarzaur; Patrick Murphy; Kathryn Anderson; Thomas Douglas; Clare Griffis; Jessica McKee; Andrew W Kirkpatrick; Juan P Wachs
Journal:  NPJ Digit Med       Date:  2020-05-21

9.  Wearable Augmented Reality Platform for Aiding Complex 3D Trajectory Tracing.

Authors:  Sara Condino; Benish Fida; Marina Carbone; Laura Cercenelli; Giovanni Badiali; Vincenzo Ferrari; Fabrizio Cutolo
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2020-03-13       Impact factor: 3.576

10.  Value of the surgeon's sightline on hologram registration and targeting in mixed reality.

Authors:  Javier A Luzon; Bojan V Stimec; Arne O Bakka; Bjørn Edwin; Dejan Ignjatovic
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2020-09-28       Impact factor: 2.924

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.