| Literature DB >> 35469355 |
Ryan Beams1, Ellenor Brown2, Wei-Chung Cheng2, Janell S Joyner2, Andrea S Kim2, Kimberly Kontson2, Dimitri Amiras3, Tassilo Baeuerle4, Walter Greenleaf5, Rafael J Grossmann6, Atul Gupta7, Christoffer Hamilton8, Hong Hua9, Tran Tu Huynh10, Christoph Leuze11, Sarah B Murthi12, John Penczek13,14, Jennifer Silva15,16, Brennan Spiegel17, Amitabh Varshney18, Aldo Badano2.
Abstract
Augmented and virtual reality devices are being actively investigated and implemented for a wide range of medical uses. However, significant gaps in the evaluation of these medical devices and applications hinder their regulatory evaluation. Addressing these gaps is critical to demonstrating the devices' safety and effectiveness. We outline the key technical and clinical evaluation challenges discussed during the US Food and Drug Administration's public workshop, "Medical Extended Reality: Toward Best Evaluation Practices for Virtual and Augmented Reality in Medicine" and future directions for evaluation method development. Evaluation challenges were categorized into several key technical and clinical areas. Finally, we highlight current efforts in the standards communities and illustrate connections between the evaluation challenges and the intended uses of the medical extended reality (MXR) devices. Participants concluded that additional research is needed to assess the safety and effectiveness of MXR devices across the use cases.Entities:
Keywords: Augmented reality; Image quality; Medical imaging; Virtual reality
Mesh:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35469355 PMCID: PMC9582055 DOI: 10.1007/s10278-022-00622-x
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Digit Imaging ISSN: 0897-1889 Impact factor: 4.903