Ningcheng Li1, Jonathan Wakim2, Yilun Koethe1, Timothy Huber1, Ryan Schenning1, Terence P Gade2, Stephen J Hunt2, Brian J Park3. 1. Dotter Department of Interventional Radiology, Oregon Health & Science University School of Medicine, 3181 SW Sam Jackson Park Rd, Portland, OR, 97239, USA. 2. Department of Radiology, Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, 3400 Spruce St, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA. 3. Dotter Department of Interventional Radiology, Oregon Health & Science University School of Medicine, 3181 SW Sam Jackson Park Rd, Portland, OR, 97239, USA. parkbr@ohsu.edu.
Abstract
PURPOSE: To evaluate manual and automatic registration times and registration accuracies on HoloLens 2 for aligning a 3D CT phantom model onto a CT grid, a crucial step for intuitive 3D navigation during CT-guided interventions; to compare registration times between HoloLens 1 and 2. METHODS: Eighteen participants in various stages of clinical training across two academic centers performed registration of a 3D CT phantom model onto a CT grid using HoloLens 2. Registration times and accuracies were compared among different registration methods, clinical experience levels, and consecutive attempts. Registration times were also compared retrospectively to prior HoloLens 1 results. RESULTS: Mean aggregate manual registration times were 27.7 s, 24.3 s, and 72.8 s for one-handed gesture, two-handed gesture, and Xbox controller, respectively; mean automatic registration time was 5.3 s (ANOVA p < 0.0001). No significant difference in registration times was found among attendings, residents and fellows, and medical students (p > 0.05). Significant improvements in registration times were detected across consecutive attempts using hand gestures (p < 0.01). Compared to prior HoloLens 1 data, hand gesture registration was 81.7% faster with HoloLens 2 (p < 0.05). Registration accuracies were not significantly different across manual registration methods, measuring at 5.9 mm, 9.5 mm, and 8.6 mm with one-handed gesture, two-handed gesture, and Xbox controller, respectively (p > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Manual registration times decreased significantly on HoloLens 2, approaching those of automatic registration and outperforming Xbox controller registration. Fast, adaptive, and accurate registration of holographic models of cross-sectional imaging is paramount for the implementation of augmented reality-assisted 3D navigation during CT-guided interventions.
PURPOSE: To evaluate manual and automatic registration times and registration accuracies on HoloLens 2 for aligning a 3D CT phantom model onto a CT grid, a crucial step for intuitive 3D navigation during CT-guided interventions; to compare registration times between HoloLens 1 and 2. METHODS: Eighteen participants in various stages of clinical training across two academic centers performed registration of a 3D CT phantom model onto a CT grid using HoloLens 2. Registration times and accuracies were compared among different registration methods, clinical experience levels, and consecutive attempts. Registration times were also compared retrospectively to prior HoloLens 1 results. RESULTS: Mean aggregate manual registration times were 27.7 s, 24.3 s, and 72.8 s for one-handed gesture, two-handed gesture, and Xbox controller, respectively; mean automatic registration time was 5.3 s (ANOVA p < 0.0001). No significant difference in registration times was found among attendings, residents and fellows, and medical students (p > 0.05). Significant improvements in registration times were detected across consecutive attempts using hand gestures (p < 0.01). Compared to prior HoloLens 1 data, hand gesture registration was 81.7% faster with HoloLens 2 (p < 0.05). Registration accuracies were not significantly different across manual registration methods, measuring at 5.9 mm, 9.5 mm, and 8.6 mm with one-handed gesture, two-handed gesture, and Xbox controller, respectively (p > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Manual registration times decreased significantly on HoloLens 2, approaching those of automatic registration and outperforming Xbox controller registration. Fast, adaptive, and accurate registration of holographic models of cross-sectional imaging is paramount for the implementation of augmented reality-assisted 3D navigation during CT-guided interventions.
Authors: Raul N Uppot; Benjamin Laguna; Colin J McCarthy; Gianluca De Novi; Andrew Phelps; Eliot Siegel; Jesse Courtier Journal: Radiology Date: 2019-04-16 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: Rafa Rahman; Matthew E Wood; Long Qian; Carrie L Price; Alex A Johnson; Greg M Osgood Journal: Surg Innov Date: 2019-09-12 Impact factor: 2.058
Authors: Stephanie L Perkins; Brooke Krajancich; Chi-Fu Jeffrey Yang; Brian A Hargreaves; Bruce L Daniel; Mark F Berry Journal: Ann Thorac Surg Date: 2020-03-05 Impact factor: 4.330
Authors: Joanna K Weeks; Jina Pakpoor; Brian J Park; Nicole J Robinson; Neal A Rubinstein; Stephen M Prouty; Arun C Nachiappan Journal: Acad Radiol Date: 2020-08-20 Impact factor: 3.173
Authors: Maximilian Linxweiler; Lukas Pillong; Dragan Kopanja; Jan P Kühn; Stefan Wagenpfeil; Julia C Radosa; Jingming Wang; Luc G T Morris; Basel Al Kadah; Florian Bochen; Sandrina Körner; Bernhard Schick Journal: Laryngoscope Investig Otolaryngol Date: 2020-08-07
Authors: Pascal Kiarostami; Cyrill Dennler; Simon Roner; Reto Sutter; Philipp Fürnstahl; Mazda Farshad; Stefan Rahm; Patrick O Zingg Journal: J Orthop Surg Res Date: 2020-11-17 Impact factor: 2.359