| Literature DB >> 31058855 |
Elena-Alina Moacă1,2, Ciprian-Valentin Mihali3, Ioana-Gabriela Macaşoi4, Roxana Racoviceanu Băbuţă5, Codruţa Şoica6, Cristina-Adriana Dehelean7, Cornelia Păcurariu8, Sorin Florescu9.
Abstract
In this study Fe3O4@C matrix was obtained by combustion method and used hereafter as adsorbent forEntities:
Keywords: Fe3O4@C matrix; adsorption; combustion method; isotherms; kinetics; magnetic properties
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31058855 PMCID: PMC6539884 DOI: 10.3390/molecules24091727
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Molecules ISSN: 1420-3049 Impact factor: 4.411
Figure 1XRD pattern of the Fe3O4@C matrix prepared by combustion synthesis.
Figure 2Magnetic hysteresis curve of the Fe3O4@C matrix.
Figure 3TG-DSC curves of the Fe3O4@C matrix.
Figure 4FTIR spectrum of the Fe3O4@C matrix.
Figure 5SEM-EDAX analysis of the Fe3O4@C matrix. (A) general overview—50 µm scale; (B) topology—2 µm scale; (C) EDAX.
Figure 6TEM micrograph of Fe3O4@C matrix. (A) magnification 220 Kx; (B) magnification 300 Kx.
Elemental composition of the Fe3O4@C matrix.
| Element | Wt% | At% | K-Ratio | Z | A | F |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| C k | 50.48 | 72.62 | 0.1729 | 1.0502 | 0.3261 | 1.0003 |
| O k | 15.66 | 16.91 | 0.0276 | 1.0342 | 0.1705 | 1.0010 |
| Fe k | 33.86 | 10.47 | 0.3140 | 0.8872 | 1.0453 | 1.0000 |
| Total | 100.00 | 100.00 |
Figure 7Removal efficiency of paracetamol and acetylsalicylic acid on the Fe3O4@C matrix.
Figure 8Adsorbed amount versus time for paracetamol and acetylsalicylic acid on the Fe3O4@C matrix.
Figure 9The pseudo-first-order (A) and the pseudo-second-order (B) models for paracetamol adsorption.
Figure 10The pseudo-first-order (A) and the pseudo-second-order (B) models for acetylsalicylic acid adsorption.
Kinetics parameters and the correlation coefficients (R2) for the paracetamol and acetylsalicylic acid adsorptions onto Fe3O4@C matrix.
| Pseudo-Second-Order | Pseudo-First-Order | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Adsorbate | Conc. [mg/L] | k2·103 | R2 | qe [mg/g] | R2 | k1·103 | |
| Experimental | Calculated | ||||||
| Paracetamol | 50 | 22.94 | 0.99996 | 24.36 | 24.47 | 0.94914 | 11.37 |
| Acetylsalicylic acid | 100 | 3.56 | 0.99977 | 43.43 | 44.62 | 0.88386 | 10.38 |
Figure 11Isotherm plots for paracetamol (A) and acetylsalicylic acid (B) on the Fe3O4@C matrix.
Isothermal parameters and correlation coefficients for paracetamol and acetylsalicylic acid adsorption, respectively, on 2 g/L mass of Fe3O4@C matrix.
| Analgesic Drug | Isotherm Model | Parameter | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
| Langmuir | KL [L mg−1] | 0.01384 |
| qm [mg g−1] | 142.011 | ||
| R2 | 0.95703 | ||
| χ2 | 107.22 | ||
| Freundlich | KF [mg1−(1/n)L1/ng−1] | 13.48712 | |
| n | 2.77126 | ||
| R2 | 0.9838 | ||
| χ2 | 40.41 | ||
|
| KRP [L g−1] | 8.94606 | |
| αRP [(L mg−1)β] | 0.41013 | ||
| β | 0.71298 | ||
|
|
| ||
| χ2 | 35.10 | ||
|
| Langmuir | KL [L mg−1] | 0.00452 |
| qm [mg g−1] | 234.0139 | ||
| R2 | 0.95008 | ||
| χ2 | 161.44 | ||
|
| KF [mg1−(1/n)L1/ng−1] | 6.64178 | |
| n | 1.91846 | ||
|
|
| ||
| χ2 | 18.73 | ||
| Redlich–Peterson | KRP [L g−1] | 479009.3512 | |
| αRP [(L mg−1)β] | 72115.6797 | ||
| β | 0.47876 | ||
| R2 | 0.99228 | ||
| χ2 | 24.97 |
Comparison of the removal efficiency of paracetamol using different adsorbents.
| Adsorbent | Obtained/Acquisition Mode | Adsorbent Quantity [g L−1] | Adsorption Condition | Equilibrium Time | Maximum Adsorption Quantity [mg g−1] | References |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fe3O4@C matrix | combustion method | 2 | T = 25 °C | 1 h | 141.99 | this study |
| Reduced activated carbon | obtained from heated granulated carbon at 900°C | 4 | T = 25 °C | 48 h | 245.7 | [ |
| Activated carbon | obtained by various biological precursors materials | 1 | T = 30 °C | 20 min | 99.42 | [ |
| Activated carbon | purchased (Ever Gainfull Enterprise Sdn. Bhd) | 1 | T = 40 °C | 2 h | 92.17 | [ |
| Fe/N-CNT/β-CD nanocomposite | microwave-assisted method | 1 | T = 25 °C | 30 min | 75.2 | [ |
| N-CNT/β-CD nanocomposite | 41 |
Comparison of the removal efficiency of acetylsalicylic acid using different adsorbents.
| Adsorbent | Obtained/Acquisition Mode | Adsorbent Quantity [g L−1] | Adsorption Condition | Equilibrium Time | Maximum Adsorption Quantity [mg g−1] | References |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fe3O4@C matrix | combustion method | 2 | T = 25 °C | 2 h | 234.02 | this study |
| Banana peel bioadsorbent | obtained from the banana silver fruit | 6 | T = 25 °C | 15 min | 2.29 | [ |
| Fe/N-CNT/β-CD nanocomposite | microwave-assisted method | 1 | T = 25 °C | 30 min | 101.0 | [ |
| N-CNT/β-CD nanocomposite | 71.9 | |||||
| Activated carbon | purchased (Sigma-Aldrich) | 0.15 | T = 26 °C | 48 h | 236.0 | [ |
| Sephabeads SP 206 Polymer | purchased | 0.84 | T = 20 °C | 150 min | 45.2 | [ |
| Sephabeads SP 207 Polymer | 0.72 | 81.6 |
Figure 12General preparation scheme of Fe3O4@C matrix.