| Literature DB >> 33171673 |
Georgiana Cornelia Ispas1,2, Raluca Manea1,2, Roxana Ioana Brazdis1,3, Anda Maria Baroi1, Toma Fistos1,3, Radu Claudiu Fierascu1,3, Monica Florentina Raduly1.
Abstract
Currently, hydroxyapatite is probably the most researched material, due to its multiple applications in medical, environmental, or cultural heritage, when the classical structure is modified and calcium is displaced partially or totally with different metals. By changing the classical structure of the hydroxyapatite, new morphologies can be obtained, thus allowing final applications different from those of the initial hydroxyapatite material. However, their properties should be tuned for the desired application. In this context, the present paper describes the synthesis and characterization (through energy-dispersive X-ray fluorescence, X-ray diffraction, FTIR, thermal analysis, and transmission electron microscopy) of iron oxide/manganese-containing phosphatic phase composite materials, developed in order to obtain the enhancement of final environmental applications (photodegradation of dyes, adsorption of organic compounds). The composite material was tested for photocatalytic properties, after embedding in hydrosoluble film-forming materials. Photocatalytic coatings show different activity during the photodecomposition of Methylene Blue, used as a model of a contaminant. The photocatalytic activities of the materials were discussed in relationship with both the phosphatic materials and the magnetic components. Finally, other environmental applications were studied for the developed materials (adsorption of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs-paracetamol and ibuprofen), revealing an enhancement of the adsorption capacity of the phosphatic material upon addition of the magnetic phase.Entities:
Keywords: analytical characterization; environmental protection; iron oxide/phosphatic materials; non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs removal; photodegradation of dyes
Year: 2020 PMID: 33171673 PMCID: PMC7664691 DOI: 10.3390/ma13215034
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Materials (Basel) ISSN: 1996-1944 Impact factor: 3.623
Sample encoding.
| Encoding | Description |
|---|---|
| M | Magnetic iron oxide |
| MnHAP | Mn-containing phosphatic material |
| MnHAP-M | Composite material: Mn-containing phosphatic material with magnetic iron oxide |
Figure 1X-ray fluorescence (XRF) spectra of the obtained composite material (MnHAP-M) and of the magnetic iron oxide.
Elemental analysis of the MnHAP and MnHAP-M samples. L.E.—light elements (not detectable by XRF).
| Element | MnHAP (%) | MnHAP-M (%) |
|---|---|---|
| Mn | 23.28 ± 0.16 | 21.68 ± 0.16 |
| Ca | 16.91 ± 0.11 | 14.82 ± 0.11 |
| P | 14.54 ± 0.11 | 14.71 ± 0.11 |
| Fe | 0.256 ± 0.02 | 3.292 ± 0.04 |
| L.E. | 45.01 ± 0.36 | 45.49 ± 0.48 |
Figure 2X-ray diffractograms of the analyzed materials. #—peaks corresponding to the manganese apatitic material; <—pararobertsite; ^—iron oxide (magnetite/maghemite).
Figure 3FTIR spectra of the composite material (MnHAP-M), compared with the manganese phosphatic material (MnHAP) and the magnetic iron oxide (M). Peaks further discussed are detailed on the spectra.
Figure 4Thermogram of the developed composite material (MnHAP-M).
Figure 5TEM images of the composite material (MnHAP-M), at different magnifications.
Figure 6Photodecomposition of MB using coatings containing HAP-Mn (a) and HAP-Mn-M (b) at 0, 30, 60, 90, 120, and 150 min.; normalized Kubelka–Munk spectra for the two used materials (c).
Figure 7MB photodegradation efficiency under xenon light exposure.
Figure 8Influence of the adsorbent type in the adsorption process using ibuprofen as pollutant (a), and phenol (b), respectively.
Figure 9(a) Influence of the adsorbent type in the adsorption process using paracetamol as pollutant; (b) Influence of the pollutant type in the adsorption process using the MnHAP-M composite material.
Parameters obtained from the Langmuir, Freundlich, Sips, and Temkin models.
| Pollutant | Ibuprofen | Phenol | Paracetamol | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Adsorbent | MnHAP | MnHAP-M | MnHAP | MnHAP-M | MnHAP | MnHAP-M |
|
| ||||||
| 9.5832 | 6.8066 | 2.7821 | 2.9012 | 5.5192 | 5.6394 | |
| 0.0079 | 0.0129 | 0.0173 | 0.0212 | 0.0222 | 0.0237 | |
| R2 | 0.9749 | 0.9652 | 0.9685 | 0.9839 | 0.9414 | 0.9667 |
| χ2 | 0.0265 | 0.0382 | 0.0112 | 0.0071 | 0.0681 | 0.0355 |
|
| ||||||
| 0.1027 | 0.1468 | 0.1158 | 0.1526 | 0.2195 | 0.2230 | |
| n | 1.1913 | 1.3449 | 1.6476 | 1.7476 | 1.4978 | 1.4602 |
| R2 | 0.9676 | 0.9526 | 0.9511 | 0.9604 | 0.9224 | 0.9456 |
| χ2 | 0.0344 | 0.0521 | 0.0173 | 0.0175 | 0.0902 | 0.0581 |
|
| ||||||
| α (L mg−1) | 2.9013 | 1.5116 | 1.3014 | 2.0275 | 2.7231 | 2.0886 |
| β (kJ mol−1) | 0.4101 | 0.4946 | 0.2912 | 0.2943 | 0.4643 | 0.4913 |
| R2 | 0.6211 | 0.6842 | 0.7842 | 0.7474 | 0.6751 | 0.7154 |
| χ2 | 0.4026 | 0.3469 | 0.0768 | 0.1118 | 0.3778 | 0.3039 |
|
| ||||||
| 3.0571 | 3.4247 | 1.9754 | 2.2858 | 2.7855 | 3.5723 | |
| 0.0434 | 0.0410 | 0.0323 | 0.0337 | 0.0667 | 0.0535 | |
| M | 2.3672 | 1.8144 | 1.5007 | 1.3263 | 3.0104 | 1.5241 |
| R2 | 0.9957 | 0.9736 | 0.9691 | 0.9858 | 0.9733 | 0.9719 |
| χ2 | 0.0043 | 0.0289 | 0.0110 | 0.0063 | 0.0311 | 0.0299 |
Figure 10Raman spectra of the composite material before and after the adsorption process.
Iron and manganese leaching (as determined by AAS). Results are presented in mg/L. Detection limit (D.L.)—0.1 mg/L for both elements.
| Element | Blank Sample | Supernatant from MnHAP-M |
|---|---|---|
| Mn | ≤ D.L. | 0.604 ± 0.01 |
| Fe | ≤ D.L. | ≤ D.L. |