Literature DB >> 21295051

Utilizing toxicogenomic data to understand chemical mechanism of action in risk assessment.

Vickie S Wilson1, Nagalakshmi Keshava, Susan Hester, Deborah Segal, Weihsueh Chiu, Chad M Thompson, Susan Y Euling.   

Abstract

The predominant role of toxicogenomic data in risk assessment, thus far, has been one of augmentation of more traditional in vitro and in vivo toxicology data. This article focuses on the current available examples of instances where toxicogenomic data has been evaluated in human health risk assessment (e.g., acetochlor and arsenicals) which have been limited to the application of toxicogenomic data to inform mechanism of action. This article reviews the regulatory policy backdrop and highlights important efforts to ultimately achieve regulatory acceptance. A number of research efforts on specific chemicals that were designed for risk assessment purposes have employed mechanism or mode of action hypothesis testing and generating strategies. The strides made by large scale efforts to utilize toxicogenomic data in screening, testing, and risk assessment are also discussed. These efforts include both the refinement of methodologies for performing toxicogenomics studies and analysis of the resultant data sets. The current issues limiting the application of toxicogenomics to define mode or mechanism of action in risk assessment are discussed together with interrelated research needs. In summary, as chemical risk assessment moves away from a single mechanism of action approach toward a toxicity pathway-based paradigm, we envision that toxicogenomic data from multiple technologies (e.g., proteomics, metabolomics, transcriptomics, supportive RT-PCR studies) can be used in conjunction with one another to understand the complexities of multiple, and possibly interacting, pathways affected by chemicals which will impact human health risk assessment. Published by Elsevier Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Mechanism of action; Risk assessment; Toxicogenomics

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21295051     DOI: 10.1016/j.taap.2011.01.017

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Toxicol Appl Pharmacol        ISSN: 0041-008X            Impact factor:   4.219


  11 in total

Review 1.  Current understanding of the mechanism of benzene-induced leukemia in humans: implications for risk assessment.

Authors:  Cliona M McHale; Luoping Zhang; Martyn T Smith
Journal:  Carcinogenesis       Date:  2011-12-12       Impact factor: 4.944

2.  Application of in silico and in vitro methods in the development of adverse outcome pathway constructs in wildlife.

Authors:  Judith C Madden; Vera Rogiers; Mathieu Vinken
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2014-11-19       Impact factor: 6.237

3.  Technical guide for applications of gene expression profiling in human health risk assessment of environmental chemicals.

Authors:  Julie A Bourdon-Lacombe; Ivy D Moffat; Michelle Deveau; Mainul Husain; Scott Auerbach; Daniel Krewski; Russell S Thomas; Pierre R Bushel; Andrew Williams; Carole L Yauk
Journal:  Regul Toxicol Pharmacol       Date:  2015-05-02       Impact factor: 3.271

4.  Development of a toxicogenomics signature for genotoxicity using a dose-optimization and informatics strategy in human cells.

Authors:  Heng-Hong Li; Daniel R Hyduke; Renxiang Chen; Pamela Heard; Carole L Yauk; Jiri Aubrecht; Albert J Fornace
Journal:  Environ Mol Mutagen       Date:  2015-03-02       Impact factor: 3.216

5.  Next generation sequencing data for use in risk assessment.

Authors:  B Alex Merrick
Journal:  Curr Opin Toxicol       Date:  2019-03-08

Review 6.  Assessment of the mode of action underlying development of rodent small intestinal tumors following oral exposure to hexavalent chromium and relevance to humans.

Authors:  Chad M Thompson; Deborah M Proctor; Mina Suh; Laurie C Haws; Christopher R Kirman; Mark A Harris
Journal:  Crit Rev Toxicol       Date:  2013-03       Impact factor: 5.635

7.  Profiling environmental chemicals for activity in the antioxidant response element signaling pathway using a high throughput screening approach.

Authors:  Sunita J Shukla; Ruili Huang; Steven O Simmons; Raymond R Tice; Kristine L Witt; Danielle Vanleer; Ram Ramabhadran; Christopher P Austin; Menghang Xia
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2012-05-02       Impact factor: 9.031

Review 8.  Proteomics for systems toxicology.

Authors:  Bjoern Titz; Ashraf Elamin; Florian Martin; Thomas Schneider; Sophie Dijon; Nikolai V Ivanov; Julia Hoeng; Manuel C Peitsch
Journal:  Comput Struct Biotechnol J       Date:  2014-08-27       Impact factor: 7.271

9.  Transcriptomic responses in the oral cavity of F344 rats and B6C3F1 mice following exposure to Cr(VI): Implications for risk assessment.

Authors:  Chad M Thompson; Julia E Rager; Mina Suh; Caroline L Ring; Deborah M Proctor; Laurie C Haws; Rebecca C Fry; Mark A Harris
Journal:  Environ Mol Mutagen       Date:  2016-11-15       Impact factor: 3.216

10.  Nano-risk Science: application of toxicogenomics in an adverse outcome pathway framework for risk assessment of multi-walled carbon nanotubes.

Authors:  Sarah Labib; Andrew Williams; Carole L Yauk; Jake K Nikota; Håkan Wallin; Ulla Vogel; Sabina Halappanavar
Journal:  Part Fibre Toxicol       Date:  2016-03-15       Impact factor: 9.400

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.