Literature DB >> 2010567

Attitudes of professionals in providing maternity care in a primary health care system in Saudi Arabia.

A N al-Nasser1, M A al-Sekait, W A Khan, E A Bamgboye.   

Abstract

This study was done on a sample of the primary care centers in the Al-Baha region, Saudi Arabia to assess the opinions of the medical and paramedical staff regarding the capability and acceptability of providing antenatal and intrapartum care in the primary health care setting. The study showed that 96% of all the respondents supported the provision of antenatal care services in primary health care with 60% of them giving the reason that it is more convenient for pregnant women. 90% of the respondents wanted the antenatal care to be delivered through special clinics and the majority of them wanted to give a greater role to the midwives in antenatal care. Questioned about the intranatal care provision in the centers, 98% of all the respondents agreed to the utilization of primary health care in such service. A similar percentage of them claimed to have the ability to do deliveries in the centers with existing facilities. To avoid duplication of care and to best use of available resources, low risk pregnancies should be seen antenatally and delivered in the primary health care centers provided and quality of such care is kept under control.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Arab Countries; Asia; Attitude; Behavior; Delivery Of Health Care; Developing Countries; Health; Health Facilities; Health Personnel; Health Services; Maternal Health Services; Maternal-child Health Services; Primary Health Care; Psychological Factors; Research Methodology; Sampling Studies; Saudi Arabia; Studies; Western Asia

Mesh:

Year:  1991        PMID: 2010567     DOI: 10.1007/bf01340464

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Community Health        ISSN: 0094-5145


  19 in total

1.  General practitioner obstetrics: does risk prediction work?

Authors:  J L Reynolds; P L Yudkin; M J Bull
Journal:  J R Coll Gen Pract       Date:  1988-07

2.  Comparison between the outcome of antenatal care led primarily by district physician or by obstetrician. A study on a defined population based on the Medical Birth Registry.

Authors:  A Håkansson
Journal:  Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand       Date:  1988       Impact factor: 3.636

3.  General practitioner obstetrics in the Northern region in 1983.

Authors:  G N Marsh; H A Cashman; I T Russell
Journal:  Br Med J (Clin Res Ed)       Date:  1985-03-23

4.  Contribution of isolated general practitioner maternity units.

Authors:  A J Cavenagh; K M Phillips; B Sheridan; E M Williams
Journal:  Br Med J (Clin Res Ed)       Date:  1984-05-12

5.  Maternity care: a duplication of resources.

Authors:  S Robinson
Journal:  J R Coll Gen Pract       Date:  1985-07

6.  Ten years' experience in a general practice obstetric unit.

Authors:  M J Bull
Journal:  J R Coll Gen Pract       Date:  1980-04

7.  A comparison of low-risk pregnant women booked for delivery in two systems of care: shared-care (consultant) and integrated general practice unit. I. Obstetrical procedures and neonatal outcome.

Authors:  M Klein; I Lloyd; C Redman; M Bull; A C Turnbull
Journal:  Br J Obstet Gynaecol       Date:  1983-02

8.  Integration of general-practitioner and specialist antenatal care.

Authors:  L I Zander; M Watson; R W Taylor; D C Morrell
Journal:  J R Coll Gen Pract       Date:  1978-08

9.  Home confinement: the positive results in Holland.

Authors:  S M Damstra-Wijmenga
Journal:  J R Coll Gen Pract       Date:  1984-08

10.  How safe is general practitioner obstetrics?

Authors:  G W Taylor; W Edgar; B A Taylor; D G Neal
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1980-12-13       Impact factor: 79.321

View more
  1 in total

1.  Providing antenatal services in a primary health care system.

Authors:  A N al-Nasser; E A Bamgboye; F A Abdullah
Journal:  J Community Health       Date:  1994-04
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.