Structurally and functionally well-defined recombinant proteins are an interesting class of sequence-controlled macromolecules to which different crosslinking chemistries can be applied to tune their biological properties. Herein, we take advantage of a 571-residue recombinant peptide based on human collagen type I (RCPhC1), which we functionalized with supramolecular 4-fold hydrogen bonding ureido-pyrimidinone (UPy) moieties. By grafting supramolecular UPy moieties onto the backbone of RCPhC1 (UPy-RCPhC1), increased control over the polymer structure, assembly, gelation, and mechanical properties was achieved. In addition, by increasing the degree of UPy functionalization on RCPhC1, cardiomyocyte progenitor cells were cultured on "soft" (∼26 kPa) versus "stiff" (∼68-190 kPa) UPy-RCPhC1 hydrogels. Interestingly, increased stress fiber formation, focal adhesions, and proliferation were observed on stiffer compared to softer substrates, owing to the formation of stronger cell-material interactions. In conclusion, a bioinspired hydrogel material was designed by a combination of two well-known natural components, i.e., a protein as sequence-controlled polymer and UPy units inspired on nucleobases.
Structurally and functionally well-defined recombinant proteins are an interesting class of sequence-controlled macromolecules to which different crosslinking chemistries can be applied to tune their biological properties. Herein, we take advantage of a 571-residue recombinant peptide based on human collagen type I (RCPhC1), which we functionalized with supramolecular 4-fold hydrogen bonding ureido-pyrimidinone (UPy) moieties. By grafting supramolecular UPy moieties onto the backbone of RCPhC1 (UPy-RCPhC1), increased control over the polymer structure, assembly, gelation, and mechanical properties was achieved. In addition, by increasing the degree of UPy functionalization on RCPhC1, cardiomyocyte progenitor cells were cultured on "soft" (∼26 kPa) versus "stiff" (∼68-190 kPa) UPy-RCPhC1 hydrogels. Interestingly, increased stress fiber formation, focal adhesions, and proliferation were observed on stiffer compared to softer substrates, owing to the formation of stronger cell-material interactions. In conclusion, a bioinspired hydrogel material was designed by a combination of two well-known natural components, i.e., a protein as sequence-controlled polymer and UPy units inspired on nucleobases.
The extracellular matrix
(ECM) acts as a natural scaffold for cells
and is important for the regulation and maintenance of cellular fate
in terms of tissue development and pathology.[1−3] Many researchers
have studied the influence of different ECM properties and the effect
on cellular behavior for improved cell-based tissue regeneration.[4] Hydrogels are a class of biomaterials that resemble
natural tissues with respect to their viscoelastic behavior. As such,
hydrogels are commonly used as instructive microenvironments for cells.[5−7] Hydrogel-based biomaterials should display (i) optimal physical
and mechanical properties that mimic the in vivo environment, (ii)
sufficient adhesion sites to allow cells to adhere and migrate, and
(iii) allow for cell-induced degradation.[8] In general, naturally derived hydrogels or materials, such as matrigel,[9] fibrin,[10] or collagen,[11] are used. These hydrogels contain high degrees
of bioactive sites and therefore seem inexorable for the development
of natural matrices.[12,13] However, these naturally based
hydrogels have low controllability and often contain mixtures of different
components and/or polymers with different lengths. Moreover, the synthesis
of sequence-controlled synthetic polymers remains challenging in the
field of polymer chemistry.[14]It
is proposed that recombinantly produced proteins are ideal candidates
to develop biomaterials with full control of bioactive properties
and polymer sequence, length and structure.[15−18] This is achieved using genetically
modified organisms such as yeast or bacteria.[19] Additionally, protein-engineered biomaterials can be further functionalized
to tune the biological and mechanical properties. Heilshorn et al.,
developed elastin-like polypeptide (ELP) hydrogels, in which the stiffness
of the hydrogel network and arginine–glycine–aspartate
(RGD) ligand density could be tuned independently.[20] This was done using tris(hydroxymethyl) phosphine (THP)
to cross-link the poly(ethylene glycol) bis(amine) linker with specific
amines located on the ELP. By changing the THP concentration, different
storage moduli were obtained, ranging from 0.01 to 2.5 kPa. Encapsulated
fibroblast cells showed more spread morphologies on the softer and
compliant gels (∼1.3 kPa) compared to stiffer gels (∼2.5
kPa), as a result of the smaller hydrogel mesh size and increased
crosslink density.[20] Another example of
protein-engineered hydrogels is based on recombinant silk-based polypeptides.[18] Repeating units of glycine, alanine, and serine,
in the backbone of silk-based polypeptides, induce the formation of
β-sheets and consequently hydrogel networks can be formed.[21] With the high degree of control in molecular
weight, polarity, and mechanical properties, recombinantly synthesized
silk-based polypeptides are suitable to create biocompatible protein-engineered
hydrogels.[22−24] These examples illustrate the benefit of recombinantly
synthesized hydrogels for regenerative medicine purposes.Recombinant
peptides based on human collagen type I (RCPhC1), commercially
known as Cellnest (FujiFilm Manufacturing Europe BV), are protein-engineered
macromolecules with controlled lengths and specific amino acid sequences.
Moreover, repeating amino acid sequences based on the integrin-binding
peptide, RGD, have been engineered into the backbone of RCPhC1, to
enhance cellular adhesion.[25] Another advantage
of the application of this recombinant collagen as the polymer is
due to its defined length, controlled sequence, and low immunologic
risk.[26] RCPhC1 was previously used as a
scaffold for the delivery of adipose-derived cells,[25] as a synthetic extracellular matrix for the development
of bone tissue,[27,28] and as a delivery vehicle for
bone-morphogenic protein-2.[29,30] Depending on the application
or cell type to be cultured, the RCPhC1 sequence can be designed and
adapted with different cross-links, e.g., methacrylates,[31] to create protein-engineered hydrogels.In this study, we used RCPhC1 as the polymer backbone for the introduction
of supramolecular 2-ureido-4[1H]-pyrimidinone (UPy) hydrogen
bonding units, to achieve control over hydrogel formation, mechanical
properties, and cellular response. Supramolecular UPy moieties were
previously used to modify different synthetic polydisperse polymers
such as hydrophilic poly(ethylene glycol) or polyesters such as polycaprolactone
and hydrophobic amorphous priplast polymers, which illustrates the
versatility of UPy-based supramolecular biomaterials.[32−34] Compared to covalently crosslinked hydrogels, UPy-modified hydrogels
allow for the possibility to tune the material properties, such as
stiffness, degradability, and bioactivity. Here, the degree of UPy
substitution onto the backbone of RCPhC1 was varied and the structure,
molecular assembly, and gelation are studied and characterized. By
increasing the amount of grafted UPy groups, it is hypothesized that
the stiffness of the hydrogel is increased. The applicability of UPy-modified
RCPhC1 hydrogels as the two-dimensional cell culture matrix is tested
using human cardiac progenitor cells (CPCs).[35] These cells are ideal candidates for cardiac regeneration applications
due to their self-renewal, ECM production capacity, and potential
to differentiate into cardiomyocytes.[36−38] Finally, the relationship
between molecular interactions and assembly versus the observed cellular
response is discussed.
Experimental Section
Materials
Chemicals and reagents were purchased from
commercial sources at the highest purity available and used without
further purification. All solvents were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich
unless stated otherwise. Cellnest, a recombinant peptide based on
human collagen type I (RCPhC1), was a gift from Fujifilm Manufacturing
Europe B.V. and was used without further purification (Figure S1). Phosphate buffered saline (PBS) tablets
were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (pH 7.2–7.6). Trypsin–ethylenediaminetetraacetic
acid (EDTA) solution was purchased from Sigma (0.5 g/L porcine trypsin
and 0.2 g/L EDTA in Hank’s balanced salt solution with phenol
red). All compound concentrations were determined by weight.
Methods
Analytical
Techniques and Equipment
Reverse-phase high-performance
liquid chromatography–mass spectrometry (RP-HPLC–MS)
was performed with a Thermo scientific LCQ fleet spectrometer. Proton
nuclear magnetic resonance (1H NMR) spectra were recorded
on a 400 MHz NMR (Varian Mercury Vx or Varian 400MR) operating at
400 MHz to determine the degree of functionalization. Proton chemical
shifts are reported in ppm downfield from tetramethylsilane using
the resonance of the deuterated solvent as the internal standard.
Samples for NMR were prepared in D2O/KOD with pH ≈
11 at a concentration of 25 mg/mL. The purity of RCPhC1 and UPy-RCPhC1
derivatives was determined with Waters Xevo G2 Quadrupole Time-of-Flight
liquid chromatography–mass spectrometry equipped with an Agilent
Polaris C18A reverse-phase column (ID 2.0 mm, length 100 mm). Derivatives
were dissolved in H2O (0.5 mg/mL) and flowed (0.3 mL/min)
over the column using a 15–75% water/acetonitrile gradient
with 0.1% formic acid prior to analysis in the positive mode in the
mass spectrometer. Dynamic light scattering (DLS) was measured on
a Malvern Zetasizer Nano, model ZMV2000, at a measurement angle of
90°. Circular dichroism (CD) measurements and thermal unfolding
studies were done on a JASCO J-815 spectrometer equipped with a JASCO
MPTC-490S temperature control system. ζ-Potential measurements
were performed on a Malvern instrument Zetasizer (model Nano ZSP).
Zetasizer software was used to process and analyze the data. Nanoindentations
were performed on a PIUMA nanoindenter (Optics II) using either a
probe with a tip radius of 24 or 21.5 μm and a cantilever stiffness
of 0.53 or 4.71 N/m, respectively. Calibration factors were determined
by performing indentations on polystyrene surfaces. Rheology was performed
on a TA Instruments Discovery Hybrid 3 shear rheometer with a 25 mm
Sandblasted Peltier plate. To prevent water evaporation, an oil trap
based on silicone oil (Rhodorsil) was used to seal the hydrogel. Fluorescence
images were obtained using a Zeiss Axiovert 200M fluorescence microscope
or a Leica TCS SP5X confocal laser scanning microscope. Fluorescence
for the CyQuant assay was measured on a Synergy HTX multimode plate
reader (BioTek).
Synthesis of UPy-RCPhC1
To synthesize
UPy-RCPhC1 (5), a UPy synthon containing 1,1′-carbonyldiimidazole
(4) was first synthesized and then coupled to pristine
RCPhC1 (Scheme ).
Scheme 1
Synthetic Procedure for Grafting UPy Functionalities to the Backbone
of RCPhC1
Reaction conditions: (i) 0.33
equiv di-tert-butyl dicarbonate, chloroform (CHCl3), 0 °C 1 h, rt, 24 h; (ii) 0.99 equiv ureido-pyrimidinone-hexyl-isocyanate,
1.7 equiv N,N-diisopropylethylamine,
CHCl3/methanol (MeOH) (3:1), rt, 4 h; (iii) CHCl3/trifluoroacetic acid (TFA) (4:1), rt, 3 h; (iv) 1.0 equiv 1,1′-carbonyldiimidazole,
2 equiv N,N-diisopropylethylamine,
dimethyl sulfoxide, rt, 1.5 h and; (v) different equivalents of RCPhC1
(see Table ), dimethyl
sulfoxide, 50 °C, argon, 24 h. X represents
different amounts of grafted UPy groups determined with 1H NMR.
Synthetic Procedure for Grafting UPy Functionalities to the Backbone
of RCPhC1
Reaction conditions: (i) 0.33
equiv di-tert-butyl dicarbonate, chloroform (CHCl3), 0 °C 1 h, rt, 24 h; (ii) 0.99 equiv ureido-pyrimidinone-hexyl-isocyanate,
1.7 equiv N,N-diisopropylethylamine,
CHCl3/methanol (MeOH) (3:1), rt, 4 h; (iii) CHCl3/trifluoroacetic acid (TFA) (4:1), rt, 3 h; (iv) 1.0 equiv 1,1′-carbonyldiimidazole,
2 equiv N,N-diisopropylethylamine,
dimethyl sulfoxide, rt, 1.5 h and; (v) different equivalents of RCPhC1
(see Table ), dimethyl
sulfoxide, 50 °C, argon, 24 h. X represents
different amounts of grafted UPy groups determined with 1H NMR.
Table 1
Degree of Functionalization
of the
UPy-RCPhC1 Derivatives Based on 1H NMR
UPy-RCPhC1 derivative
RCPhC1-NH2/UPy-CDI molar ratio
yield (%)
integral at 5.7–5.8 ppm
integral
at 0.8–1.0 ppm
theoretical molecular weight (kg/mol)
UPy-RCPhC1-2
1:0.25
85.6
2.0
264
52.2
UPy-RCPhC1-5
1:0.5
90.4
5.2
264
53.8
UPy-RCPhC1-8
1:1
99.3
8.3
264
55.4
UPy-RCPhC1-12
1:1
81.2
12.4
264
57.4
UPy-RCPhC1-16
1:1
77.4
16.1
264
59.5
Synthesis of 12-Amino-dodecyl-boc (1)
A flask was charged with 1,12-dodecadiamine (15
g, 75.0 mmol, 3 equiv)
and dissolved in chloroform (CHCl3) (300 mL). The stirring
solution was cooled in an ice-bath to 0 °C and a solution of
di-tert-butyl dicarbonate (5.45 g, 25.0 mmol, 1 equiv)
in CHCl3 (50 mL) was added dropwise. After the reaction
mixture was stirred for 24 h, the solvents were removed by rotary
evaporation to yield a transparent oil. The oil was concentrated under
vacuum for 1 h to form a white solid. The solid was dissolved in ethyl
acetate (EtOAc) (400 mL) and washed with half-saturated brine (3 mL
× 100 mL). Purification was performed by column chromatography
(flash silica) with methanol (MeOH)–triethylamine (Et3N) (10%)/dichloromethane (CH2Cl2) (10:90) affording
3.46 g (11.5 mmol, 46%) of 1 as a white solid. 1H NMR (CDCl3) δ (ppm): 4.53 (s, 1H), 3.09 (dd, 2H),
2.68 (t, 2H), 1.58 (s, 3H), 1.44 (s, 13H), 1.26 (s, 16H) (Figure S2). LC–MS electrospray ionization
(ESI) m/z calcd (C17H36N2O2) 300.28; found 301.25 [M + H]+.
Synthesis of 12-(Ureido-pyrimidinone-hexyl-urea)-1-dodecyl-boc
(2)
A round bottom flask was charged with ureido-pyrimidinone-hexyl-isocyanate
(499 mg, 1.70 mmol, 1 equiv), monoprotected amine 1 (514
mg, 1.71 mmol, 1.01 equiv) and dissolved in CHCl3 (30 mL)
and MeOH (10 mL). N,N-Diisopropylethylamine
(0.5 mL, 2.91 mmol, 1.7 equiv) was added to the stirring solution.
After 4 h of stirring, the reaction mixture was purified on a short
plug of silica eluting with CHCl3/MeOH (1:1) to remove
excess of amine 1. The solvents were removed by rotary
evaporation and concentrated under vacuum to yield 1.01 g (1.69 mmol,
99%) of 2 as a white waxy solid. 1H NMR (CDCl3/MeOD) δ (ppm): 5.86 (s, 1H), 3.28 (m, 2H), 3.11 (m,
6H), 2.26 (s, 3H), 1.59 (m, 2H), 1.44 (s, 15H), 1.36 (m, 4H), 1.25
(m, 18H) (Figure S3). LC–MS (ESI) m/z calcd (C30H55N7O5) 593.43; found 594.42 [M + H]+.
Synthesis of 12-(Ureido-pyrimidinone-hexyl-urea)-1-dodecyl-amine
(3)
A round bottom flask was charged with compound 2 (355 mg, 0.60 mmol, 1 equiv), and dissolved in CH2Cl2 (16 mL). Trifluoroacetic acid (TFA) (4 mL) was added
to the solution. After stirring the reaction mixture for 3 h, the
solvents were evaporated by rotary evaporation and flushed with methanol
to remove residual TFA to yield a light reddish oil. The oil was redissolved
in CHCl3/MeOH (3:1) and precipitated in Et2O.
The precipitate was concentrated under vacuum to yield 285 mg of 3 (0.47 mmol, 78%) as a TFA salt in the form of an off-white
solid. 1H NMR (CDCL3/MeOD) δ (ppm): 5.91
(s, 1H), 3.24 (t, 2H), 3.10 (m, 4H), 2.89 (m, 2H), 2.27 (s, 3H), 1.64
(m, 2H), 1.57 (m, 2H), 1.46 (m, 4H), 1.36–1.26 (m, 20H) (Figure S4). LC–MS (ESI) m/z calcd (C25H47N7O3) 493.37; found 494.42 [M + H]+.
Synthesis
of 1,1′-Carbonyldiimidazole-activated UPy Synthon
(4) and UPy-RCPhC1 (5)
Preactivation
was performed by dissolving compound 3 in dimethyl sulfoxide
(2–5 mL), followed by the addition of N,N-diisopropylethylamine (2 equiv). Once dissolved, 1 equiv
1,1′-carbonyldiimidazole was added to the reaction mixture
and allowed to react for 1.5 h. The formation of compound 4 was checked with RP-HPLC–MS before continuing with the next
step (Figure S5). Recombinant peptide based
on human collagen I (RCPhC1) (Figure S6) was dissolved in dimethyl sulfoxide and stirred under argon at
50 °C. Once dissolved, different equivalents of compound 4 was added to the reaction mixture to obtain different grafted
UPy on the backbone of RCPhC1 (5) and stirred for 24
h at 50 °C. Next, the reaction mixture was precipitated in diethyl
ether and centrifuged at 3500 rpm for 5 min. The obtained pellet was
dissolved in 10 mL demi water/ethanol (1:1) solution. The reaction
mixture was purified using a dialysis membrane (MW cut-off = 3.5 kDa) in 800 mL demi water/ethanol (1:1)
solution for 48 h and an additional 24 h in pure demi water. The purified
solution was freeze-dried until a white material was obtained. The
degree of substitution of compound 5 was determined with 1H NMR (Table ).
Hydrogel Formulation
10 wt/vol %
(100 mg/mL) hydrogels
were created by first dissolving the UPy-RCPhC1 derivative in phosphate
buffered saline (PBS) with pH = 12.7 (for 2, 5, and 8 UPy functionalities)
or pH 12.9 (for 12 and 16 UPy functionalities) and was stirred at
50–70 °C until a homogenous solution was formed. Due to
the different amounts of grafted UPy functionalities between the different
UPy-RCPhC1 polymers, different pH values were used to improve solubility.
To readjust the pH and increase UPy–UPy association, d-glucono-δ-lactone (GDL) powder was mixed with the UPy-RCPhC1
solution. An amount of 10 mg/mL (for 2, 5, and 8 UPy functionalities)
or 20 mg/mL (for 12 and 16 UPy functionalities) of GDL powder was
added for each hydrogel. Due to the hydrolysis of GDL to gluconic
acid, the pH slowly reduces to pH = 5–6 after 24 h and hydrogels
are formed.
Dynamic Light Scattering
Samples
for DLS measurements
were prepared by dissolving 2 mg/mL of each compound in PBS and annealing
for 1 h at 70 °C. The samples were filtered before measurement
with a Whatman poly(vinylidene difluoride) filter, 0.45 μm.
The temperature was set at 20 °C and decreased to 5 °C with
steps of 5 °C, equilibrating for 500 s before measuring.
ζ-Potential
The samples were dissolved in (4-(2-hydroxyethyl)-1-piperazineethanesulfonic
acid) (1 mM, pH = 7.6) at a concentration of 0.1 mg/mL and filtered
with a 0.45 μm collagen filter. A DTS1070 cuvette was used for
measuring the ζ-potential. The samples were measured in triplo,
at room temperature, with a 30 s equilibration time. Measurement duration
was automated and automatic attenuation and voltage selection were
turned on.
Circular Dichroism
Samples for CD
measurements were
prepared by dissolving 0.5 mg/mL of the compounds in ultrapure water
and stirring for approximately 30 min. The higher functionalized compounds
(UPy-RCPhC1-12, UPy-RCPhC1-16) were annealed for 30 min at 50 °C.
Measurements were performed with a scan speed of 100 nm/min, data
pitch of 0.25 nm, a response time of 0.5 s, a bandwidth of 2, and
a path length of 0.1 cm. The spectra were measured from 170 to 300
nm. The signal was processed with “Adjacent Averaging”,
5 points of window. Experiments were conducted at a concentration
of 0.5 mg/mL in a 0.1 cm Hellma quartz cell. For each measurement,
the temperature was increased initially to 60 °C and decreased
with steps of 1 °C/min to 5 °C. The molar residual ellipticity
was determined using the following equation[39]where θ
is the ellipticity in millidegrees, m is the molecular
weight in g/mol, c is
the concentration in mg/mL, l is the path length
in cm, and nz is the number of amino acids
in the peptide. Graphs are shown from 180 to 280 nm, due to the higher
noise ratio observed below 200 nm and due to the wavelength absorption
of water.
Cryogenic Transmission Electron Microscopy
Cryogenic
transmission electron microscopy was performed using samples with
a concentration of 0.5 or 5 mg/mL. Vitrified films were prepared using
a computer-controlled vitrification robot (FEI Vitrobot Mark III,
FEI Company) at 22 °C, and at a relative humidity of 100%. In
the preparation chamber of the “Vitrobot”, 3 μL
sample was applied on a Lacey film (LC200-CU, Electron Microscopy
Sciences). These films were surface plasma treated just prior to use,
with a Cressington 208 carbon coater operating at 5 mA for 40 s. Excess
sample was removed by blotting using filter paper for 3 s at −3
mm, and the thin film thus formed was plunged (acceleration about
3 g) into liquid ethane just above its freezing point. Vitrified films
were transferred into the vacuum of a CryoTITAN equipped with a field
emission gun that was operated at 300 kV, a post-column Gatan energy
filter, and a 2048 × 2048 Gatan CCD camera. Micrographs were
taken at low dose conditions, starting at a magnification of 6500
times with a defocus setting of 40 μm, and at a magnification
of 24 000 times with defocus settings of 10 and 15 μm.
The sizes of the observed micelles were measured manually using Fiji
software.
Nanoindentations
Nanoindentation
tests were applied
to measure the mechanical properties of UPy-RCPhC1 hydrogels, which
is based on a probe that is in contact with the surface of the material
and is pushed through. Depending on the load (P),
spherical tip radius (Ri), displacement
(h), and stiffness of the cantilever, the effective
Young’s modulus (Eeff) can be determined
via the following formula considering the Hertzian contact model[40]where the effective Young’s
modulus
is derived from a certain percentage of the elastic–plastic
loading regime, displacement he, of the
loading curve. Hydrogels with volumes of 50 μL were formed in
the cap of a 200 μL Eppendorf tube, which was glued inside a
small Petri dish. Before measuring the mechanical properties, the
Petri dishes were filled with serum-free media (M199, Gibco) to cover
the hydrogels. Indentations were performed using a cantilever with
a stiffness of 0.53 N/m and a tip radius of 24 μm or a cantilever
with a stiffness of 4.71 N/m and a tip radius of 21.5 μm for
hydrogels based on UPy-RCPhC1-5/UPy-RCPhC1-8 and UPy-RCPhC1-12/UPy-RCPhC1-16,
respectively. Calibrations were performed before measurements and
indentation profiles were identical for each hydrogel. The effective
Young’s modulus (Eeff) was determined
using the Hertzian contact model which is fitted through 20–60%
of the loading curves using DataViewer (Piuma, OPTICS11).
Rheological
Analysis
Hydrogels were prepared as stated
previously. Following the addition of GDL, the gelation was followed
at a constant shear rate of 1 rad/s, strain amplitude of 1%, and temperature
of 25 °C for 1 h until complete gelation. Temperature sweeps
were performed from 45 to 5 °C with increments of 4 °C and
at each temperature step, hydrogels were soaked for 5 min to allow
equilibration of temperature and rearrangement of molecules.
Cell
Experiments
L9TB cardiomyocyte progenitor cells
(CPCs) were immortalized by lentiviral transduction of hTert and BMI-1
(L9TB).[35] CPCs were cultured in SP++ growth
medium containing M199 (Gibco), which uses a bicarbonate buffer system,
and EGM-2 BulletKit (Lonza) in a 3:1 volume ratio, supplemented with
10% fetal bovine serum, 1% penicillin/streptomycin (Lonza), and 1%
nonessential amino acids (Gibco) at physiological pH. CPCs were routinely
cultured on 0.1% gelatin-coated PS, passaged at 80–90% confluency
and seeded at a concentration of 3.1 × 104 cells/cm2. Hydrogels were washed with SP++ before seeding cells to
remove any excess of gluconic acid.
Immunofluorescence Staining
CPCs cultured on UPy-RCPhC1
hydrogels were first washed with PBS, fixated in 3.7% formaldehyde
(Merck) for 10 min, washed twice with PBS, and permeabilized with
0.5% Triton X-100 (Merck) for 10 min. Non-specific binding of antibodies
was minimized by incubating in 2% horse serum in PBS for 20 min. Cells
were then incubated with primary antibodies in 10% horse serum in
PBS for 2 h at 4 °C. Subsequently, the cells were first washed
with PBS and incubated with a secondary antibody and phalloidin-FITC
for 1 h in PBS followed by incubation with 4′,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole
(0.4 μg/mL) in PBS for 5 min. Finally, the samples were washed
and mounted on cover glasses with Mowiol (Sigma). Information regarding
primary and secondary antibodies are listed in the Supporting Information
(Table S1). The samples were imaged with
a confocal laser scanning microscope (Leica TCS SP5X).
Cell Proliferation
Assay
CPCs cultured on UPy-RCPhC1
hydrogels were first washed with PBS and the culture plate was frozen
at −80 °C. A commercially available CyQuant Assay was
used to measure the fluorescence of a dye that binds to nucleic acids.
Based on a standard curve of known cell numbers (Figure S21), the fluorescence could be translated into cell
numbers for each sample.
Statistical Analysis
Data are presented
as mean ±
standard deviation (SD). These data consisted of nanoindentations,
cell numbers, and particle size measured with cryo-transmission electron
microscopy (TEM). All statistical differences were determined using
a nonparametric Kruskal–Wallis test with Dunn’s post
hoc test. Probabilities of p < 0.05 were considered
as significantly different. All statistical analyses were performed
using GraphPad Prism 5 Software (GraphPad Software, Inc.)
Results and Discussion
Synthesis and Characterization of UPy-RCPhC1
Derivatives
A 1,1′-carbonyldiimidazole (CDI)-activated
UPy synthon composed
of a urea group and a 12-carbon alkyl spacer 4 was designed
and can be easily reacted with the RCPhC1 protein. The reaction involving
CDI is fast and selective and thereby circumvents the need for any
catalyst.[41] First, 1,12-dodecadiamine was
protected with a boc-group yielding 1 (yield = 46%).
Subsequently, 1 was reacted with UPy-hexyl-isocyanate,
resulting in 2 (yield = 99%). Next, compound 2 was deprotected yielding amine-terminated UPy synthon 3 (yield = 78%). The CDI-activated UPy synthon 4 was
synthesized by reacting amine-terminated UPy group 3 with
CDI in the presence of a base. Finally, the CDI-activated UPy synthon 4 was reacted with nucleophilic amines on RCPhC1, which resulted
in the formation of an additional urea group (Scheme ). 1H NMR was used to determine
the amount of grafted UPy functionalities on RCPhC1 (Figure A). Due to the presence of
a fixed number of 88 alanine residues on RCPhC1, the protons of methyl
groups from the alanine side groups were used as a reference to determine
the amount of grafted UPy groups on RCPhC1 (Figure B). Clearly, an increase in signal, corresponding
to the UPy moiety, was observed upon increasing the feed ratio of
CDI-activated UPy 4 (Figure A). However, some variations in the amount
of grafted UPy functionalities were observed, which are likely due
to the presence of impurities in the CDI-activated UPy synthon 4 (Table ).
With this approach, a library with different degrees of UPy substitutions,
i.e., UPy-RCPhC1-2, UPy-RCPhC1-5, UPy-RCPhC1-8, UPy-RCPhC1-12, and
UPy-RCPhC1-16, was achieved by varying the ratio of 4 to the amount of RCPhC1 (Figure S13).
Based on RP-HPLC, broadening of the product is observed compared to
pristine RCPhC1, which indicates increased polydispersity and multiple
degrees of functionalization for UPy-RCPhC1 compounds (Figure C). Additionally, an increase
in retention time is observed, which is likely due to the presence
of an increased amount of hydrophobic alkyl spaced UPy functionalities
(Figure C). Higher
retention time was observed for UPy-RCPhC1-12 compared to UPy-RCPhC1-16,
which could be due to the collapse of UPy-RCPhC1-16 in H2O and a decrease in the interaction with the column of the chromatogram.
The molecular weights of the UPy-RCPhC1 derivatives were determined
using mass spectrometry for UPy-RCPhC1-2, -5, and -8 (Figures S8–S10). Due to the high degree
of UPy conjugation and decrease of protonated amines, it was impossible
to determine the molecular weights of UPy-RCPhC1-12 and UPy-RCPhC1-16
(Figures S11 and S12). Nevertheless, a
library containing different degrees of UPy substitutions was successfully
synthesized (Figure S13). Additionally,
due to the presence of grafted UPy functionalities, the supramolecular
assembly can be studied based on the combination of hydrogen bonding
and hydrophobic interactions (Figure S13).
Figure 1
Characterization of supramolecular UPy-modified recombinant collagen
peptide derivatives. (A) 1H NMR graphs showing characteristic
peaks of the protons on alanine residues (δ-shift = 0.7–0.9
ppm), which are used as the reference, and peaks of the alkylidene
proton of the UPy groups (δ-shift = 5.7–5.8 ppm) for
RCPhC1 and each UPy-RCPhC1 derivative. (B) Schematic representation
of protons used to determine UPy conjugation, which is the alkylidene
proton of the UPy group (UPy-H) and the protons on the
methyl group on alanine groups (Ala-CH3).
(C) Chromatogram of UPy-RCPhC1 derivatives in H2O (arrow
indicates an increase in UPy grafting).
Characterization of supramolecular UPy-modified recombinant collagen
peptide derivatives. (A) 1H NMR graphs showing characteristic
peaks of the protons on alanine residues (δ-shift = 0.7–0.9
ppm), which are used as the reference, and peaks of the alkylidene
proton of the UPy groups (δ-shift = 5.7–5.8 ppm) for
RCPhC1 and each UPy-RCPhC1 derivative. (B) Schematic representation
of protons used to determine UPy conjugation, which is the alkylidene
proton of the UPy group (UPy-H) and the protons on the
methyl group on alanine groups (Ala-CH3).
(C) Chromatogram of UPy-RCPhC1 derivatives in H2O (arrow
indicates an increase in UPy grafting).
Structure of RCPhC1 and UPy-RCPhC1 Derivatives
RCPhC1
is a sequence controlled, monodisperse polymer with a molecular weight
of 51 kDa (Figure S7). In PBS solution,
it assembles into particles with a size of 6.9 ± 1.0 nm, observed
with Cryo-TEM (Figures A,C and S14). UPy-RCPhC1-8 shows a similar
particle size of 6.6 ± 1.0 nm (Figures B,D and S14).
These results show that the conjugation of at least 8 UPy groups to
RCPhC1 does not have a large influence on the structural properties
of pristine RCPhC1.
Figure 2
Cryogenic transmission electron microscopy images of diluted
solutions
of (A) 5 mg/mL RCPhC1 (left) and (B) 0.5 mg/mL UPy-RCPhC1-8 (right)
in PBS (scale bar is equal to 50 nm). Particle sizes are indicated
in the lower right part of the image and are shown as mean ±
SD. Zoomed-in image of (C) RCPhC1 and (D) UPy-RCPhC1-8 (scale bar
is equal to 10 nm).
Cryogenic transmission electron microscopy images of diluted
solutions
of (A) 5 mg/mL RCPhC1 (left) and (B) 0.5 mg/mL UPy-RCPhC1-8 (right)
in PBS (scale bar is equal to 50 nm). Particle sizes are indicated
in the lower right part of the image and are shown as mean ±
SD. Zoomed-in image of (C) RCPhC1 and (D) UPy-RCPhC1-8 (scale bar
is equal to 10 nm).It is known that RCPhC1
does not form organized triple helical
structures typically seen for natural collagen type I.[42] However, due to the presence of proline residues
in the amino acid sequence of RCPhC1, some secondary structures, categorized
as “random coils”, are formed similar to gelatin and
can be detected with circular dichroism (CD).[39,43,44] Secondary structures formed by pristine
RCPhC1 show a minimum at ∼195 nm and a maximum at ∼220
nm (Figure A). Upon
cooling RCPhC1 to 5 °C, intermolecular interactions, based on
hydrogen bonding, ionic and hydrophobic interactions, are stabilized
and result in an increased CD effect, which is in agreement with other
collagen-based peptides or proteins found in the literature (Figure A).[42] Moreover, after conjugating UPy groups to RCPhC1 a typical
“random coil” structure and a small shift of the minima
was observed (UPy-RCPhC1-2: ∼198 nm; UPy-RCPhC1-5: ∼202
nm; UPy-RCPhC1-8: ∼200 nm; UPy-RCPhC1-12: ∼198 nm; UPy-RCPhC1-16:
∼205 nm) (Figure B–F). This could simply be the result of small variations
in the CD spectrum for the different UPy-RCPhC1 polymers, which indicate
minimal differences in the secondary structure following covalent
conjugation of UPy functionalities to residual amines. Interestingly,
an increase of the CD effect was observed for all UPy-RCPhC1 derivatives
upon cooling to 5 °C (Figure A–F). This effect illustrates that enhanced
CD effects as a result of cooling and stabilization of intermolecular
interactions are maintained following UPy conjugation. Moreover, functionalization
of RCPhC1 with 2, 5, and 8 UPy groups resulted in an increase of the
maxima at ∼220 nm, which was higher compared to pristine RCPhC1
(at 220 nm; RCPhC1: [θ] = −0.59; UPy-RCPhC1-2: [θ]
= 1.27; UPy-RCPhC1-5: [θ] = 8.65; UPy-RCPhC1-8: [θ] =
5.14) (Figure A–D).
It is proposed that a stabilization effect occurs as a result of UPy–UPy
interactions, which enhances the CD effect and conceivably the secondary
structure of RCPhC1.
Figure 3
Structural analysis of RCPhC1 and UPy-RCPhC1 derivatives.
(A–F)
Circular dichroism graphs of RCPhC1 and UPy-RCPhC1 derivates measured
at 20 °C (solid line) and 5 °C (dotted line) at a concentration
of 0.5 mg/mL in ultrapure water. (A′–F′) Dynamic
Light scattering measurements and normalized particle size distribution
of RCPhC1 and UPy-RCPhC1 derivatives at 20 °C (solid line) and
5 °C (dotted line) at a concentration of 2 mg/mL in PBS.
Structural analysis of RCPhC1 and UPy-RCPhC1 derivatives.
(A–F)
Circular dichroism graphs of RCPhC1 and UPy-RCPhC1 derivates measured
at 20 °C (solid line) and 5 °C (dotted line) at a concentration
of 0.5 mg/mL in ultrapure water. (A′–F′) Dynamic
Light scattering measurements and normalized particle size distribution
of RCPhC1 and UPy-RCPhC1 derivatives at 20 °C (solid line) and
5 °C (dotted line) at a concentration of 2 mg/mL in PBS.Next, particle size distribution
and information related to the
aggregation of RCPhC1 and UPy-RCPhC1 derivatives were studied with
dynamic light scattering (DLS) (Figure A′–F′ and Table ). Pristine RCPhC1 had a particle size of
14.5 ± 1.1 nm, which is larger than the size observed with cryo-TEM
(Figures A′
and 2A), an effect that is commonly observed
and likely due to the hydration shell of the proteins.[45] No difference in particle size was observed
upon cooling pristine RCPhC1 to 5 °C, which was not expected
due to the increase in the CD effect, which was observed upon cooling
as a result of stabilized intermolecular interactions. However, longer
incubation time periods resulted in an increase in the particle size
which indicates aggregation of RCPhC1 particles via weak intermolecular
interactions (data not shown).
Table 2
Overview of the Mean
± SD of
Triplicates of the Particle Size, Dispersity Index, and ζ-Potential
of RCPhC1 and UPy-RCPhC1 Derivatives Measured with DLS at 20 and 5
°C
size
(nm)
dispersity
index
derivative
20 °C
5 °C
20 °C
5 °C
ζ-potential
RCPhC1
14.5 ± 1.1
13.2 ± 0.1
0.23 ± 0.05
0.17 ± 0.01
–6.1 ± 0.2
UPy-RCPhC1-2
21.3 ± 0.3
56.7 ± 5.6
0.43 ± 0.01
0.27 ± 0.02
–6.9 ± 0.1
UPy-RCPhC1-5
21.6 ± 0.1
50.9 ± 2.8
0.20 ± 0.01
0.21 ± 0.01
–9.4 ± 0.8
UPy-RCPhC1-8
21.6 ± 0.1
32.5 ± 1.4
0.10 ± 0.02
0.15 ± 0.01
–15.5 ± 0.7
UPy-RCPhC1-12
16.1 ± 0.1
16.1 ± 0.1
0.14 ± 0.01
0.13 ± 0.01
–29.0 ± 1.6
UPy-RCPhC1-16
15.2 ± 0.4
14.9 ± 0.1
0.12 ± 0.01
0.12 ± 0.01
–34.6 ± 2.0
Functionalization of RCPhC1
with UPy groups resulted in a small
increase in hydrodynamic particle size for UPy-RCPhC1-2 (21.3 ±
0.3 nm), UPy-RCPhC1-5 (21.6 ± 0.1 nm), and UPy-RCPhC1-8 (21.6
± 0.1 nm) and similar particle size for UPy-RCPhC1-12 (16.1 ±
0.1 nm) and UPy-RCPhC1-16 (15.2 ± 0.4 nm) (Table ). Similar to pristine RCPhC1, cooling of
UPy-RCPhC1-12 and UPy-RCPhC1-16 to 5 °C did not change the particle
size and dispersity index (Figure A′,E′,F′). For UPy-RCPhC1-2, 5,
and 8, a clear increase in the hydrodynamic particle size and dispersity
index is observed upon cooling the samples to 5 °C (Figure B′–D′).
An increase of the dispersity index is the result of an increased
dispersity of particle size within the sample, which is the result
of aggregation and was only seen for intermediate UPy conjugations
(2, 5, and 8). For UPy-RCPhC1-2, two distinct populations were observed
at 20 °C (Figure B′). This is likely due to the presence of both grafted and
unmodified RCPhC1, which results in different types of aggregation
mechanisms and in the formation of larger and smaller particles. These
results could be partially explained by the balance between intra-
and intermolecular interactions and the polarity between the different
UPy-RCPhC1 derivatives (Figure S16). By
increasing the degree of functionalization of UPy groups, a decrease
in polarity (Figure C) and a decrease of the ζ-potential of each UPy-RCPhC1 derivative
were observed (Table ). This is expected since polar and positively charged amine functional
groups are replaced by hydrophobic UPy functionalities, which could
influence the aggregation of UPy-RCPhC1 derivatives via their RCPhC1–RCPhC1
or UPy–UPy interactions. It is speculated that molecular packing
and self-assembly via RCPhC1–RCPhC1 and/or UPy–UPy interactions
are enhanced for the intermediate degree of functionalization (UPy-RCPhC1-2,
5, and 8) due to the presence of sufficient free amines that enhance
solubility while allowing for intermolecular interactions with carboxyl
groups between UPy-RCPhC1 molecules. Accordingly, higher degrees of
functionalization (UPy-RCPhC1-12 and 16) resulted in a decrease in
polarity and solubility, which results in more dense molecular packing.It is speculated that for higher UPy conjugations, more stable
intramolecular interactions are formed based on hydrogen bonding and
hydrophobic interactions of the UPy moieties, which results in a decrease
in electrostatic interactions of free amines and carboxyl groups between
UPy-RCPhC1 molecules (Figure S16). This
could explain the decrease in the formation of larger aggregates in
dilute solutions (Figure E′,F′) of UPy-RCPhC1-12 and UPy-RCPhC1-16. Since
the aggregation behavior of UPy-RCPhC1 derivatives is dictated via
both RCPhC1–RCPhC1 and UPy–UPy interactions, it remains
difficult to elucidate the true effect of different degrees of UPy
functionalization. For this reason, the pH was first increased (pH
> 12) to dissociate UPy–UPy interactions and consequently
decreased
to also study the aggregation behavior at different temperatures.
At elevated pH, RCPhC1 and UPy-RCPhC1 derivatives have a similar particle
size; however, some subpopulations are observed for intermediate degrees
of functionalization UPy-RCPhC1-2, -5, and -8 (Figure S15). Upon decreasing the temperature to 5 °C,
no change in particle size is observed, which indicates a decrease
in intermolecular interactions as a result of elevated pH. Upon lowering
the pH, different particle size distribution and larger particle sizes
were observed for RCPhC1 and all UPy-RCPhC1 derivatives. In addition,
decreasing the temperature to 5 °C resulted in a wider distribution
of the particle size (Figure S15). Moreover,
for high degrees of UPy functionalizations, UPy-RCPhC1-12 and UPy-RCPhC1-16,
larger aggregates formed after adjusting the pH. These results show
the complexity of molecular aggregation as a result of changes in
pH or temperature which is due to the presence of both RCPhC1–RCPhC1
and UPy–UPy interactions.
Hydrogel Formation and
Mechanical Properties
The effect
of increasing the degree of functionalization with UPy groups was
also studied in concentrated solutions of UPy-RCPhC1 in PBS (100 mg/mL).
The temperature was lowered to determine the liquid-gel cross-over
of these solutions (Figure S17). In general,
concentrated solutions of pristine RCPhC1 show a cross-over of the G′ and G″ and gel formation
at ∼10 °C. Interestingly, upon functionalization of RCPhC1
with on average 2 UPy groups and 5 UPy groups, an increase in cross-over
temperature was observed, 14 and 16 °C, respectively (Figure S17). For UPy-RCPhC1-8, -12, and -16,
a hydrogel was observed at all temperatures. These results clearly
indicate the influence of UPy functionalities on the increase of cross-link
formation and faster gelation.Next, mechanical properties were
measured using a nanoindenter, since loads (micronewton range) and
scales (10–20 μm) are similar to what cells are able
to sense. Interestingly, robust and stable hydrogels were formed through
the modification of RCPhC1 with UPy functionalities (100 mg/mL, 20
°C) (Figure A).
Hydrogels based on UPy-RCPhC1-5, 8, 12, and 16 remained intact at
room temperature, however, an increase in opacity was observed as
the degree of UPy functionalization increased (Figure A). This could be due to the presence of
more UPy groups that cause the formation of larger aggregates within
the hydrogel network, which resulted in decreased transparency. Interestingly,
an increase in effective Young’s modulus was observed upon
increasing the degree of functionalization (Figure C). This is due to the presence of larger
amounts of cross-links when more UPy groups are coupled to the backbone
of RCPhC1. Indeed, the load–displacement curves recorded for
each hydrogel show a local increase in the stiffness and maximum load
(Figure B) and thereby
confirm that the macroscopic properties we observe originate from
our grafting strategy at the molecular scale. Here, it was chosen
to study the response of mechanically sensitive cells, i.e., cardiac
progenitor cells, on different UPy-RCPhC1 hydrogels as a culture platform.
The stiffness of cardiac tissue typically ranges between 1–2
and 10–20 kPa from cardiac development up to mature cardiac
tissue, respectively.[46−48] Additionally, following a myocardial infarction,
a fibrotic scar is formed that typically displays a higher order of
magnitude mechanical stiffness with Young’s moduli of 35–70
kPa.[49] It was shown that embryonic cardiomyocytes
respond differently on substrates with these mechanical rigidities.[49] For this reason, it is speculated that cardiac
progenitor cells would also respond differently on “soft”
UPy-RCPhC1-8 hydrogels (Eeff = 26 ±
19 kPa) compared to more rigid UPy-RCPhC1-12 and UPy-RCPhC1-16 hydrogels
(Eeff = 68 ± 51 and 190 ± 118
kPa, respectively). Unfortunately, UPy-RCPhC1-2 and -5 did not form
hydrogels at a concentration of 10 wt % at 37 °C.
Figure 4
Mechanical characterization
of UPy-RCPhC1 hydrogels measured with
the Piuma Nanoindenter in serum-free cell culture medium (M199). (A)
Images of UPy-RCPhC1 hydrogels showing a decrease in transparency
as the amount of grafted UPy functionalities increases. (B) Representative
load–displacement curves of each hydrogel, UPy-RCPhC1-5 (dark
blue), UPy-RCPhC1-8 (green), UPy-RCPhC1-12 (red), and UPy-RCPhC1-16
(light blue). (C) Graph showing average values for the calculated
effective Young’s modulus (Eeff) for UPy-RCPhC1-5 (dark blue), UPy-RCPhC1-8 (green), UPy-RCPhC1-12
(red), and UPy-RCPhC1-16 (light blue) (10 wt/v %, 20 °C).
Mechanical characterization
of UPy-RCPhC1 hydrogels measured with
the Piuma Nanoindenter in serum-free cell culture medium (M199). (A)
Images of UPy-RCPhC1 hydrogels showing a decrease in transparency
as the amount of grafted UPy functionalities increases. (B) Representative
load–displacement curves of each hydrogel, UPy-RCPhC1-5 (dark
blue), UPy-RCPhC1-8 (green), UPy-RCPhC1-12 (red), and UPy-RCPhC1-16
(light blue). (C) Graph showing average values for the calculated
effective Young’s modulus (Eeff) for UPy-RCPhC1-5 (dark blue), UPy-RCPhC1-8 (green), UPy-RCPhC1-12
(red), and UPy-RCPhC1-16 (light blue) (10 wt/v %, 20 °C).
CPC Behavior on UPy-RCPhC1
Hydrogels
Previous studies
have determined the relationship between the mechanical stiffness
of the environment and the biological response of cells.[50−52] Moreover, in the field of cardiac development and regeneration,
the effect of the substrate stiffness on the adhesion, proliferation,
and differentiation of cardiac progenitor cells have been thoroughly
studied previously.[48,53] It was shown that matrix stiffness
influences the genetic expression of cardiac progenitor cells (CPCs)
via their mechanotransduction pathways.[36,54] Here, CPCs
were cultured on top of UPy-RCPhC1-8, -12, and -16 hydrogels and both
adhesion and proliferation were studied (Figure ). The polymer concentration (10 wt %) and
thereby the RGD concentration (each RCPhC1 molecule contains a fixed
number of 12 RGD) were kept constant to study only the effect of substrate
stiffness as a result of changing the UPy conjugation. Intriguingly,
CPCs showed increased spreading and decreased clustering on stiffer
UPy-RCPhC1-12 and -16 substrates compared to UPy-RCPhC1-8, which was
coupled with an increase in stress fiber and zyxin formation after
1 day of culture (Figure A). Zyxin is a phosphoprotein which is located at the focal
adhesions and thereby indicates a strong interaction between cells
and their extracellular matrix.[55] Increased
amounts of zyxin spots on UPy-RCPhC1 hydrogels could be due to increased
stiffness, whereas on softer UPy-RCPhC1-8 surfaces cells favor cell
clustering and cell–cell interactions due to the low mechanical
rigidity (Figure A).
Next, CPC proliferation was studied on UPy-RCPhC1-8, -12, and -16
after 3 days of culture (Figure B,C). For UPy-RCPhC1-8, CPCs showed low proliferation
and cell numbers (Figure B) and low expression of proliferation marker ki-67 was observed
(Figure C). For stiffer
substrates based on UPy-RCPhC1-12 and -16, an increase in cell number
(Figure B) and ki-67
expression was observed (Figure C).
Figure 5
Cell adhesion and proliferation on UPy-RCPhC1 hydrogels.
(A) Immunofluorescence
images showing CPC distribution, f-actin stress fiber formation, and
zyxin protein localization on (top-to-bottom) UPy-RCPhC1-8, UPy-RCPhC1-12,
and UPy-RCPhC1-16. For each hydrogel, the individual
channels, merged and zoomed images are shown from left-to-right, the
nuclei (blue), f-actin stress fibers (green), zyxin (red), merged
image and zoomed images (the dotted area is seen on the merged image).
Scale bar is equal to 75 and 25 μm. (B) Graph showing the cell
numbers after 3 days of culture on UPy-RCPhC1-8, UPy-RCPhC1-12, and
UPy-RCPhC1-16. The dotted line represents seeded cells on day 0. (C)
Immunofluorescence images showing ki-67 protein expression located
at the nuclei after 3 days of culture on UPy-RCPhC1-8, UPy-RCPhC1-12,
and UPy-RCPhC1-16. Ki-67 is shown in white, f-actin in green, nuclei
in blue, and the scale bar is equal to 100 or 75 μm.
Cell adhesion and proliferation on UPy-RCPhC1 hydrogels.
(A) Immunofluorescence
images showing CPC distribution, f-actin stress fiber formation, and
zyxin protein localization on (top-to-bottom) UPy-RCPhC1-8, UPy-RCPhC1-12,
and UPy-RCPhC1-16. For each hydrogel, the individual
channels, merged and zoomed images are shown from left-to-right, the
nuclei (blue), f-actin stress fibers (green), zyxin (red), merged
image and zoomed images (the dotted area is seen on the merged image).
Scale bar is equal to 75 and 25 μm. (B) Graph showing the cell
numbers after 3 days of culture on UPy-RCPhC1-8, UPy-RCPhC1-12, and
UPy-RCPhC1-16. The dotted line represents seeded cells on day 0. (C)
Immunofluorescence images showing ki-67 protein expression located
at the nuclei after 3 days of culture on UPy-RCPhC1-8, UPy-RCPhC1-12,
and UPy-RCPhC1-16. Ki-67 is shown in white, f-actin in green, nuclei
in blue, and the scale bar is equal to 100 or 75 μm.These results indicate that the proliferation of
CPCs is inhibited
on softer substrates. These findings are in agreement with previous
research; however, different rigidities and cell types were studied.[47,56] The mechanical stiffness of the substrate may also direct the cellular
fate of CPCs or cardiac stem cells.[36] Therefore,
we further studied the effect of stiffness of the different substrates
on the behavior of CPCs. To this end, the intracellular Yes-associated
protein (YAP) was stained and imaged (Figures S18 and S20). YAP is a downstream effector protein involved
in the Hippo pathway that is a key player in sensing substrate stiffness
and consequently driving cellular fate.[57−59] The mechanism is based
on the translocation of YAP from the cytoplasm to the nucleus and
results in downstream signaling related to proliferation and differentiation.
Accordingly, immunofluorescence images show a minor increase of the
YAP signal located at the nucleus compared to the cytoplasm on UPy-RCPhC1-12
hydrogels compared to UPy-RCPhC1-8 and UPy-RCPhC1-16 (Figure S18). However, due to the high degree
of clustering, it remains inconclusive to relate the mechanical rigidity
of the substrate with the YAP translocation, since it was shown that
YAP mechanosensing is correlated to cell density regardless of the
substrate rigidity.[60] Taken together, different
degrees of CPC adhesion, proliferation, and YAP location was observed
on the different UPy-RCPhC1 hydrogel substrates, which is speculated
to be due the difference in crosslinking density and consequently
the mechanical rigidity (Figure S19).
Conclusions
In this work, collagen-mimicking peptides were
successfully modified
with different degrees of supramolecular UPy groups. It was shown
that the assembly and folding of UPy-RCPC1 were dependent on the degree
of functionalization and resulted in an increased stability of intermolecular
interactions based on UPy–UPy interactions. Additionally, increased
control over hydrogel formation and mechanical properties compared
to pristine RCPhC1 hydrogels was achieved. The applicability of this
hydrogel was shown by a clear difference in focal adhesion formation
and proliferation of CPCs, as a consequence of changing the mechanical
rigidity. This work illustrates the versatility of modifying biomaterials
with supramolecular UPy-based crosslinks for tissue engineering applications.
In future work, UPy-RCPhC1 derivatives can be used as pH-sensitive
injectable hydrogels (Figure S22) and as
cellular carriers that act as synthetic extracellular matrices that
used to enhance cellular-based tissue regeneration therapies.
Authors: Mieke H van Marion; Noortje A M Bax; Mark C van Turnhout; Arianna Mauretti; Daisy W J van der Schaft; Marie José T H Goumans; Carlijn V C Bouten Journal: J Mol Cell Cardiol Date: 2015-08-14 Impact factor: 5.000
Authors: C V C Bouten; P Y W Dankers; A Driessen-Mol; S Pedron; A M A Brizard; F P T Baaijens Journal: Adv Drug Deliv Rev Date: 2011-01-25 Impact factor: 15.470
Authors: Arianna Mauretti; Noortje A M Bax; Mieke H van Marion; Marie José Goumans; Cecilia Sahlgren; Carlijn V C Bouten Journal: Integr Biol (Camb) Date: 2016-09-12 Impact factor: 2.192
Authors: Kendell M Pawelec; Davide Confalonieri; Franziska Ehlicke; Huibert A van Boxtel; Heike Walles; Sebastiaan G J M Kluijtmans Journal: J Biomed Mater Res A Date: 2017-03-29 Impact factor: 4.396
Authors: Jeffrey G Jacot; Hiroko Kita-Matsuo; Karen A Wei; H S Vincent Chen; Jeffrey H Omens; Mark Mercola; Andrew D McCulloch Journal: Ann N Y Acad Sci Date: 2010-02 Impact factor: 5.691