Literature DB >> 22519549

Substrate stiffness modulates gene expression and phenotype in neonatal cardiomyocytes in vitro.

Giancarlo Forte1, Stefania Pagliari, Mitsuhiro Ebara, Koichiro Uto, Janice Kal Van Tam, Sara Romanazzo, Carmen Escobedo-Lucea, Elena Romano, Paolo Di Nardo, Enrico Traversa, Takao Aoyagi.   

Abstract

Biomaterials to be used as cell delivery systems for cardiac tissue engineering should be able to comply with cardiac muscle contractile activity, while favoring cell survival and neo-angiogenesis in a hostile environment. Biocompatible synthetic materials can be tailored to mimic cardiac tissue three-dimensional organization in the micro- and nanoscales. Nonetheless, they usually display mechanical properties that are far from those of the native myocardium and thus could affect host cell survival and activity. In the present investigation, inert poly-ε-caprolactone planar layers were manufactured to change the surface stiffness (with Young's modulus ranging from 1 to 133 MPa) without changing matrix chemistry. These substrates were challenged with neonatal murine cardiomyocytes to study the possible effect of substrate stiffness on such cell behavior without changing biological cues. Interestingly, softer substrates (0.91±0.08 and 1.53±0.16 MPa) were found to harbor mostly mature cardiomyocytes having assembled sarcomeres, as shown by the expression of alpha actinin and myosin heavy chain in typical striations and the upregulation of sarcomeric actin mRNA. On the other hand, a preferential expression of immature cardiac cell genes (Nkx-2.5) and proteins (GATA-4) in cardiac cells grown onto stiffer materials (49.67±2.56 and 133.23±8.67 MPa) was detected. This result could not be ascribed to significant differences in cell adhesion or proliferation induced by the substrates, but to the stabilization of cardiomyocyte differentiated phenotype induced by softer layers. In fact, cardiac cell electromechanical coupling was shown to be more organized on softer surfaces, as highlighted by connexin 43 distribution. Moreover, a differential regulation of genes involved in extracellular matrix remodeling was detected on soft films (0.91±0.08 MPa) as compared with the stiffest (133.23±8.67 MPa). Finally, the upregulation of a number of genes involved in inflammatory processes was detected when the stiffest polymer is used. These events highlight the differences in cell mechanosensitivity in a heterogeneous cell preparation and are likely to contribute to the differences encountered in cardiac cell phenotype induced by substrate stiffness.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22519549     DOI: 10.1089/ten.TEA.2011.0707

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Tissue Eng Part A        ISSN: 1937-3341            Impact factor:   3.845


  35 in total

Review 1.  Electrical and mechanical stimulation of cardiac cells and tissue constructs.

Authors:  Whitney L Stoppel; David L Kaplan; Lauren D Black
Journal:  Adv Drug Deliv Rev       Date:  2015-07-30       Impact factor: 15.470

2.  Temporal impact of substrate mechanics on differentiation of human embryonic stem cells to cardiomyocytes.

Authors:  Laurie B Hazeltine; Mehmet G Badur; Xiaojun Lian; Amritava Das; Wenqing Han; Sean P Palecek
Journal:  Acta Biomater       Date:  2013-11-04       Impact factor: 8.947

3.  A Role of BK Channel in Regulation of Ca2+ Channel in Ventricular Myocytes by Substrate Stiffness.

Authors:  Hucheng Zhao; Yang Yu; Xiaoan Wu; Sisi Liu; Bailin Liu; Jing Du; Bo Li; Linhua Jiang; Xiqiao Feng
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2017-04-11       Impact factor: 4.033

4.  Substrate stiffness affects skeletal myoblast differentiation in vitro.

Authors:  Sara Romanazzo; Giancarlo Forte; Mitsuhiro Ebara; Koichiro Uto; Stefania Pagliari; Takao Aoyagi; Enrico Traversa; Akiyoshi Taniguchi
Journal:  Sci Technol Adv Mater       Date:  2012-11-23       Impact factor: 8.090

Review 5.  Effect of substrate mechanics on cardiomyocyte maturation and growth.

Authors:  Marwa Tallawi; Ranjana Rai; Aldo R Boccaccini; Katerina E Aifantis
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part B Rev       Date:  2014-11-12       Impact factor: 6.389

6.  Tough and flexible CNT-polymeric hybrid scaffolds for engineering cardiac constructs.

Authors:  Mahshid Kharaziha; Su Ryon Shin; Mehdi Nikkhah; Seda Nur Topkaya; Nafiseh Masoumi; Nasim Annabi; Mehmet R Dokmeci; Ali Khademhosseini
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2014-06-10       Impact factor: 12.479

Review 7.  Introduction to cell-hydrogel mechanosensing.

Authors:  Mark Ahearne
Journal:  Interface Focus       Date:  2014-04-06       Impact factor: 3.906

Review 8.  Maturation of Pluripotent Stem Cell-Derived Cardiomyocytes: a Critical Step for Drug Development and Cell Therapy.

Authors:  Shi Hua Tan; Lei Ye
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Transl Res       Date:  2018-03-19       Impact factor: 4.132

9.  Extracellular Matrix-Mediated Maturation of Human Pluripotent Stem Cell-Derived Cardiac Monolayer Structure and Electrophysiological Function.

Authors:  Todd J Herron; Andre Monteiro Da Rocha; Katherine F Campbell; Daniela Ponce-Balbuena; B Cicero Willis; Guadalupe Guerrero-Serna; Qinghua Liu; Matt Klos; Hassan Musa; Manuel Zarzoso; Alexandra Bizy; Jamie Furness; Justus Anumonwo; Sergey Mironov; José Jalife
Journal:  Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol       Date:  2016-04

10.  Three-dimensional filamentous human diseased cardiac tissue model.

Authors:  Zhen Ma; Sangmo Koo; Micaela A Finnegan; Peter Loskill; Nathaniel Huebsch; Natalie C Marks; Bruce R Conklin; Costas P Grigoropoulos; Kevin E Healy
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2013-11-21       Impact factor: 12.479

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.