Literature DB >> 26278995

Behavior of CMPCs in unidirectional constrained and stress-free 3D hydrogels.

Mieke H van Marion1, Noortje A M Bax2, Mark C van Turnhout3, Arianna Mauretti4, Daisy W J van der Schaft5, Marie José T H Goumans6, Carlijn V C Bouten7.   

Abstract

Cardiomyocyte progenitor cells (CMPCs) are a candidate cell source for cardiac regenerative therapy. However, like other stem cells, after transplantation in the heart, cell retention and differentiation capacity of the CMPCs are low. Combining cells with biomaterials might overcome this problem. By serving as a (temporal) environment, the biomaterial can retain the cells and provide signals that enhance survival, proliferation and differentiation of the cells. To gain more insight into the effect that the encapsulation of CMPCs in a biomaterial has on their behavior, we cultured CMPCs in unidirectional constrained and stress-free collagen/Matrigel hydrogels. CMPCs cultured in 3D hydrogels stay viable and keep their cardiomyogenic profile independent of the application of strain. Moreover, the increased expression of Nkx2.5, myocardin and cTnT in 3D hydrogels compared to 2D cultures, suggests enhanced cardiomyogenic differentiation capacity of cells in 3D. Furthermore, increased expression of collagen I, collagen III, elastin and fibronectin and of the matrix remodeling enzymes MMP-1, MMP-2, MMP-9, and TIMP-1 and TIMP-2 in the 3D hydrogels is indicative of an enhanced matrix remodeling capacity of CMPCs in a 3D environment, independent of the application of strain. Interestingly, the additional application of static strain to the 3D hydrogels, as imposed by hydrogel constrainment, stabilized CMPC viability and proliferation, resulted in enhanced cardiac marker protein expression and appeared crucial for cellular organization and morphology. More specifically, CMPCs cultured in 3D collagen/Matrigel constrained hydrogels became readily mechanosensitive, had a rod-shaped morphology, and responded to the applied strain by orienting in the direction of the constraint. Overall, our data demonstrate the applicability of CMPCs in a 3D environment since encapsulation of CMPCs may stabilize survival and proliferation, can enhance the differentiation and remodeling capacity of the cells, and could induce cellular re-organization, which all may contribute to an improved efficiency of cardiac stem cell therapy.
Copyright © 2015. Published by Elsevier Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  3D cell culture; Cardiac regeneration; Cardiomyocyte progenitor cells (CMPCs); Matrix remodeling; Mechanical forces; Tissue engineering

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26278995     DOI: 10.1016/j.yjmcc.2015.08.010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Mol Cell Cardiol        ISSN: 0022-2828            Impact factor:   5.000


  8 in total

1.  Engineering Biodegradable and Biocompatible Bio-ionic Liquid Conjugated Hydrogels with Tunable Conductivity and Mechanical Properties.

Authors:  Iman Noshadi; Brian W Walker; Roberto Portillo-Lara; Ehsan Shirzaei Sani; Nayara Gomes; Mohammad Reza Aziziyan; Nasim Annabi
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-06-28       Impact factor: 4.379

2.  Fabrication of scaffold-free tubular cardiac constructs using a Bio-3D printer.

Authors:  Kenichi Arai; Daiki Murata; Ana Raquel Verissimo; Yosuke Mukae; Manabu Itoh; Anna Nakamura; Shigeki Morita; Koichi Nakayama
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-12-17       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Cardiac Progenitor Cells: The Matrix Has You.

Authors:  Clotilde Castaldo; Isotta Chimenti
Journal:  Stem Cells Transl Med       Date:  2018-04-24       Impact factor: 6.940

Review 4.  Cardiac Progenitor Cells and the Interplay with Their Microenvironment.

Authors:  Arianna Mauretti; Sergio Spaans; Noortje A M Bax; Cecilia Sahlgren; Carlijn V C Bouten
Journal:  Stem Cells Int       Date:  2017-09-17       Impact factor: 5.443

5.  Enhancing myocardial repair with CardioClusters.

Authors:  Megan M Monsanto; Bingyan J Wang; Zach R Ehrenberg; Oscar Echeagaray; Kevin S White; Roberto Alvarez; Kristina Fisher; Sharon Sengphanith; Alvin Muliono; Natalie A Gude; Mark A Sussman
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2020-08-07       Impact factor: 14.919

6.  Supramolecular Modification of a Sequence-Controlled Collagen-Mimicking Polymer.

Authors:  Sergio Spaans; Peter-Paul K H Fransen; Maaike J G Schotman; Ruben van der Wulp; René P M Lafleur; Sebastiaan G J M Kluijtmans; Patricia Y W Dankers
Journal:  Biomacromolecules       Date:  2019-05-28       Impact factor: 6.988

Review 7.  Cardiac Progenitor Cells from Stem Cells: Learning from Genetics and Biomaterials.

Authors:  Sara Barreto; Leonie Hamel; Teresa Schiatti; Ying Yang; Vinoj George
Journal:  Cells       Date:  2019-11-28       Impact factor: 6.600

Review 8.  Natural Biomaterials for Cardiac Tissue Engineering: A Highly Biocompatible Solution.

Authors:  Qasim A Majid; Annabelle T R Fricker; David A Gregory; Natalia Davidenko; Olivia Hernandez Cruz; Richard J Jabbour; Thomas J Owen; Pooja Basnett; Barbara Lukasiewicz; Molly Stevens; Serena Best; Ruth Cameron; Sanjay Sinha; Sian E Harding; Ipsita Roy
Journal:  Front Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2020-10-23
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.