Literature DB >> 31050075

Patient perspectives on the process and outcomes of psychiatric genetic counseling: An "Empowering Encounter".

Alicia Semaka1, Jehannine Austin1,2.   

Abstract

Genetic counseling (GC) for individuals with mental illness (MI) has been shown to improve patient outcomes, such as increased empowerment and self-efficacy. However, we do not understand how the process of GC results in these improvements or what aspects of the process are critical. In this qualitative study, we explored the process and outcome of psychiatric GC from the patient's perspective. Ten Canadian adults with a diagnosed MI were interviewed prior to, and 1 month following, psychiatric GC. Interview transcripts were analyzed using Grounded Theory methodology and generated a theoretical framework that describes the process and outcomes of psychiatric GC from the patient's perspective. Participants described the counseling process to be an "empowering encounter" and identified specific attributes of the process and characteristics of the counselor that contributed to their empowerment. Participants gained a new perspective on the cause and management of their MI, which seemed to facilitate a deeper acceptance of their condition. Consequently, participants reported being empowered and feeling less shame, blame, and guilt; which reportedly made them more able to manage their MI and protect their mental health; and more open to talking about their condition with family and friends. This study provides a better understanding of how the process of GC influences patient outcomes and highlights features of the process that maximize patient benefit.
© 2019 National Society of Genetic Counselors.

Entities:  

Keywords:  empowerment; genetic counseling; grounded theory; mental illness; outcomes; process

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31050075     DOI: 10.1002/jgc4.1128

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Genet Couns        ISSN: 1059-7700            Impact factor:   2.537


  7 in total

1.  An ethical analysis of divergent clinical approaches to the application of genetic testing for autism and schizophrenia.

Authors:  E Morris; M O'Donovan; A Virani; J Austin
Journal:  Hum Genet       Date:  2021-08-28       Impact factor: 4.132

2.  Teenagers and Precision Psychiatry: A Window of Opportunity.

Authors:  Maya Sabatello; Ying Chen; Carmen Fiorella Herrera; Erika Brockhoff; Jehannine Austin; Paul S Appelbaum
Journal:  Public Health Genomics       Date:  2021-01-27       Impact factor: 2.000

Review 3.  Barriers to genetic testing in clinical psychiatry and ways to overcome them: from clinicians' attitudes to sociocultural differences between patients across the globe.

Authors:  Justo Pinzón-Espinosa; Marte van der Horst; Janneke Zinkstok; Jehannine Austin; Cora Aalfs; Albert Batalla; Patrick Sullivan; Jacob Vorstman; Jurjen J Luykx
Journal:  Transl Psychiatry       Date:  2022-10-11       Impact factor: 7.989

4.  Assessing Stakeholder Perceptions of the Utility of Genetic Information for the Clinical Care of Mental Health Disorders: We Have a Will but Need to See the Way.

Authors:  Jessica L Bourdon; John M Hettema; Elizabeth C Prom-Wormley; Michael A Southam-Gerow
Journal:  Adm Policy Ment Health       Date:  2021-03

Review 5.  Evidence-Based Genetic Counseling for Psychiatric Disorders: A Road Map.

Authors:  Jehannine C Austin
Journal:  Cold Spring Harb Perspect Med       Date:  2020-06-01       Impact factor: 5.159

Review 6.  Informed consent, genomic research and mental health: A integrative review.

Authors:  Nina Kilkku; Arja Halkoaho
Journal:  Nurs Ethics       Date:  2022-02-04       Impact factor: 3.344

Review 7.  Eating Disorders, Heredity and Environmental Activation: Getting Epigenetic Concepts into Practice.

Authors:  Howard Steiger; Linda Booij
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2020-05-03       Impact factor: 4.241

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.