Literature DB >> 31046371

Psychometric function slope for speech-in-noise and speech-in-speech: Effects of development and aging.

Kathryn A Sobon1, Nardine M Taleb2, Emily Buss1, John H Grose1, Lauren Calandruccio2.   

Abstract

Masked sentence recognition was evaluated in normal-hearing children (8.8-10.5 years), young adults (18-28 years), and older adults (60-71 years). Consistent with published data, speech recognition thresholds were poorer for young children and older adults than for young adults, particularly when the masker was composed of speech. Psychometric function slopes were steeper for young children and older adults than for young adults when the masker was two-talker speech, but not when it was speech-shaped noise. Multiple factors are implicated in the age effects observed for speech-in-speech recognition at low signal-to-noise ratios.

Entities:  

Year:  2019        PMID： 31046371      PMCID： PMC6910021          DOI： 10.1121/1.5097377

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN： 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  16 in total

1.  A Speech Intelligibility Index-based approach to predict the speech reception threshold for sentences in fluctuating noise for normal-hearing listeners.

Authors:  Koenraad S Rhebergen; Niek J Versfeld
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  A glimpsing model of speech perception in noise.

Authors:  Martin Cooke
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Extended speech intelligibility index for the prediction of the speech reception threshold in fluctuating noise.

Authors:  Koenraad S Rhebergen; Niek J Versfeld; Wouter A Dreschler
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  The Montreal Cognitive Assessment, MoCA: a brief screening tool for mild cognitive impairment.

Authors:  Ziad S Nasreddine; Natalie A Phillips; Valérie Bédirian; Simon Charbonneau; Victor Whitehead; Isabelle Collin; Jeffrey L Cummings; Howard Chertkow
Journal:  J Am Geriatr Soc       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 5.562

5.  Clinical Assessment of Functional Hearing Deficits: Speech-in-Noise Performance.

Authors:  Sandeep A Phatak; Douglas S Brungart; Danielle J Zion; Ken W Grant
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2019 Mar/Apr       Impact factor: 3.570

6.  Masked speech perception across the adult lifespan: Impact of age and hearing impairment.

Authors:  Tine Goossens; Charlotte Vercammen; Jan Wouters; Astrid van Wieringen
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2016-11-12       Impact factor: 3.208

7.  Effects of age and hearing impairment on the ability to benefit from temporal and spectral modulation.

Authors:  Joseph W Hall; Emily Buss; John H Grose; Patricia A Roush
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2012 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.570

8.  Masked Sentence Recognition in Children, Young Adults, and Older Adults: Age-Dependent Effects of Semantic Context and Masker Type.

Authors:  Emily Buss; Sarah E Hodge; Lauren Calandruccio; Lori J Leibold; John H Grose
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2019 Sep/Oct       Impact factor: 3.570

9.  The BKB (Bamford-Kowal-Bench) sentence lists for partially-hearing children.

Authors:  J Bench; A Kowal; J Bamford
Journal:  Br J Audiol       Date:  1979-08

10.  Reception thresholds for sentences in quiet, continuous noise, and interrupted noise in school-age children.

Authors:  Andrew Stuart
Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 1.664
View more
  9 in total

1.  Cognitive and Linguistic Contributions to Masked Speech Recognition in Children.

Authors:  Ryan W McCreery; Margaret K Miller; Emily Buss; Lori J Leibold
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2020-09-03       Impact factor: 2.297

2.  Speech-in-Speech Recognition and Spatially Selective Attention in Children and Adults.

Authors:  Stacey G Kane; Kelly M Dean; Emily Buss
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2021-08-17       Impact factor: 2.297

3.  Does Sentence-Level Coarticulation Affect Speech Recognition in Noise or a Speech Masker?

Authors:  Brandi Jett; Emily Buss; Virginia Best; Jacob Oleson; Lauren Calandruccio
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2021-03-30       Impact factor: 2.297

4.  Contribution of Stimulus Variability to Word Recognition in Noise Versus Two-Talker Speech for School-Age Children and Adults.

Authors:  Emily Buss; Lauren Calandruccio; Jacob Oleson; Lori J Leibold
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2021 Mar/Apr       Impact factor: 3.562

5.  Speech Recognition and Listening Effort in Cochlear Implant Recipients and Normal-Hearing Listeners.

Authors:  Khaled H A Abdel-Latif; Hartmut Meister
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2022-02-10       Impact factor: 4.677

6.  The Effect of Age, Type of Noise, and Cochlear Implants on Adaptive Sentence-in-Noise Task.

Authors:  Riki Taitelbaum-Swead; Leah Fostick
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-10-04       Impact factor: 4.964

7.  The Clear-Speech Benefit for School-Age Children: Speech-in-Noise and Speech-in-Speech Recognition.

Authors:  Lauren Calandruccio; Heather L Porter; Lori J Leibold; Emily Buss
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2020-11-05       Impact factor: 2.297

8.  Effect of Masker Head Orientation, Listener Age, and Extended High-Frequency Sensitivity on Speech Recognition in Spatially Separated Speech.

Authors:  Meredith D Braza; Nicole E Corbin; Emily Buss; Brian B Monson
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2022 Jan/Feb       Impact factor: 3.562

9.  Does visual speech provide release from perceptual masking in children?

Authors:  Destinee M Halverson; Kaylah Lalonde
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2020-09       Impact factor: 1.840
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.