Literature DB >> 31046237

Crystal Structures of Protein-Bound Cyclic Peptides.

Alpeshkumar K Malde1, Timothy A Hill1, Abishek Iyer1,2, David P Fairlie1,2.   

Abstract

Cyclization is an important post-translational modification of peptides and proteins that confers key advantages such as protection from proteolytic degradation, altered solubility, membrane permeability, bioavailability, and especially restricted conformational freedom in water that allows the peptide backbone to adopt the major secondary structure elements found in proteins. Non-ribosomal synthesis in bacteria, fungi, and plants or synthetic chemistry can introduce unnatural amino acids and non-peptidic constraints that modify peptide backbones and side chains to fine-tune cyclic peptide structure. Structures can be potentially altered further upon binding to a protein in biological environments. Here we analyze three-dimensional crystal structures for 211 bioactive cyclic peptides bound to 65 different proteins. The protein-bound cyclic peptides were examined for similarities and differences in bonding modes, for main-chain and side-chain structure, and for the importance of polarity, hydrogen bonds, hydrophobic effects, and water molecules in interactions with proteins. Many protein-bound cyclic peptides show backbone structures like those (strands, sheets, turns, helices, loops, or distorted variations) found at protein-protein binding interfaces. However, the notion of macrocycles simply as privileged scaffolds that primarily project side-chain substituents for complementary interactions with proteins is dispelled here. Unlike small-molecule drugs, the cyclic peptides do not rely mainly upon hydrophobic and van der Waals interactions for protein binding; they also use their main chain and side chains to form polar contacts and hydrogen bonds with proteins. Compared to small-molecule ligands, cyclic peptides can bind across larger, polar, and water-exposed protein surface areas, making many more contacts that can increase affinity, selectivity, biological activity, and ligand-receptor residence time. Cyclic peptides have a greater capacity than small-molecule drugs to modulate protein-protein interfaces that involve large, shallow, dynamic, polar, and water-exposed protein surfaces.

Entities:  

Year:  2019        PMID: 31046237     DOI: 10.1021/acs.chemrev.8b00807

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Chem Rev        ISSN: 0009-2665            Impact factor:   60.622


  16 in total

1.  Illuminating the dark conformational space of macrocycles using dominant rotors.

Authors:  Diego B Diaz; Solomon D Appavoo; Anastasia F Bogdanchikova; Yury Lebedev; Timothy J McTiernan; Gabriel Dos Passos Gomes; Andrei K Yudin
Journal:  Nat Chem       Date:  2021-02-15       Impact factor: 24.427

Review 2.  Leveraging self-assembled nanobiomaterials for improved cancer immunotherapy.

Authors:  Michael P Vincent; Justin O Navidzadeh; Sharan Bobbala; Evan A Scott
Journal:  Cancer Cell       Date:  2022-02-10       Impact factor: 31.743

3.  Computational Design of Structured and Functional Peptide Macrocycles.

Authors:  Stephanie Berger; Parisa Hosseinzadeh
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2022

4.  Macrocyclic Inhibitors of HGF-Activating Serine Proteases Overcome Resistance to Receptor Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors and Block Lung Cancer Progression.

Authors:  Vishnu C Damalanka; Jorine J L P Voss; Matthew W Mahoney; Tina Primeau; Shunqiang Li; Lidija Klampfer; James W Janetka
Journal:  J Med Chem       Date:  2021-12-13       Impact factor: 8.039

5.  Anchor extension: a structure-guided approach to design cyclic peptides targeting enzyme active sites.

Authors:  Paris R Watson; Timothy W Craven; Xinting Li; Stephen Rettie; Parisa Hosseinzadeh; Fátima Pardo-Avila; Asim K Bera; Vikram Khipple Mulligan; Peilong Lu; Alexander S Ford; Brian D Weitzner; Lance J Stewart; Adam P Moyer; Maddalena Di Piazza; Joshua G Whalen; Per Jr Greisen; David W Christianson; David Baker
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2021-06-07       Impact factor: 14.919

6.  Drug-Like Properties in Macrocycles above MW 1000: Backbone Rigidity versus Side-Chain Lipophilicity.

Authors:  Akihiro Furukawa; Joshua Schwochert; Cameron R Pye; Daigo Asano; Quinn D Edmondson; Alexandra C Turmon; Victoria G Klein; Satoshi Ono; Okimasa Okada; R Scott Lokey
Journal:  Angew Chem Int Ed Engl       Date:  2020-09-17       Impact factor: 15.336

Review 7.  Cyclisation strategies for stabilising peptides with irregular conformations.

Authors:  Quynh Ngoc Vu; Reginald Young; Haritha Krishna Sudhakar; Tianyi Gao; Tiancheng Huang; Yaw Sing Tan; Yu Heng Lau
Journal:  RSC Med Chem       Date:  2021-04-28

Review 8.  Elucidating Solution Structures of Cyclic Peptides Using Molecular Dynamics Simulations.

Authors:  Jovan Damjanovic; Jiayuan Miao; He Huang; Yu-Shan Lin
Journal:  Chem Rev       Date:  2021-01-11       Impact factor: 60.622

Review 9.  Engineering of new-to-nature ribosomally synthesized and post-translationally modified peptide natural products.

Authors:  Chunyu Wu; Wilfred A van der Donk
Journal:  Curr Opin Biotechnol       Date:  2021-02-05       Impact factor: 10.279

10.  MOrPH-PhD: An Integrated Phage Display Platform for the Discovery of Functional Genetically Encoded Peptide Macrocycles.

Authors:  Andrew E Owens; Jacob A Iannuzzelli; Yu Gu; Rudi Fasan
Journal:  ACS Cent Sci       Date:  2020-02-04       Impact factor: 14.553

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.